Abstract
In this chapter, I will outline the beginnings of Kierkegaard’s or Haufniensis’ solution to a problem faced by Kant—the problem of how it is possible freely to do wrong. Kant has difficulty, as many have suggested, explaining the possibility of freely doing wrong, for he frequently argues that freedom and the moral law reciprocally imply one another (See Alison Assiter, “Kant and Kierkegaard on Freedom and Evil,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72 (July 2013): 275–296 for some discussion of attempts to solve this problem for Kant).I will suggest that Kierkegaard, or Haufniensis, in The Concept of Anxiety offers an approach to freedom that does not lead to Kant’s problem but that maintains Kant’s conception of freedom. The Concept of Anxiety displays the influence of Schelling. In The Concept of Axiety, Haufniensis refers to Schelling a number of times. I would like to look, in this chapter, at The Concept of Axiety and the story of Adam and Eve.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Assiter, A. (2017). The Concept of Anxiety and Kant. In: Benson, B., Putt, B. (eds) Evil, Fallenness, and Finitude . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57087-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57087-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57086-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57087-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)