Abstract
Courthouses are a unique building type. Justice architects and planners are tasked with ensuring courthouses meet the functional and security needs of many different user groups, including the entity that owns the building, court staff, judges, litigants, attorneys, public visitors, jurors, and those in custody, among others—each with distinct concerns, requirements, and expectations for the building. Courthouse planning guidelines have become more comprehensive and available (Judicial Council of California/Administrative Office of the Courts 2011) and, at the same time, courts must adhere to strict building performance and efficiency standards (California Natural Resources Agency 2016). One way to discern whether or not courthouse features are responsive to these needs and requirements is to evaluate the courthouse’s performance by conducting a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) during its occupancy. While a building performance evaluation (BPE) covers the entire life-cycle of a building, the POE focuses on the phase following building occupancy, as detailed in this chapter (Preiser and Schramm 1997; Preiser and Vischer 2005; Preiser et al. 2015).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
California Natural Resources Agency. (2016). California environmental quality act. Retrieved from http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml. Accessed on 26April 2016.
Judicial Council of California/Administrative Office of the Courts. (2011). California trial court facility standards. Retrieved from www.courts.ca.gov/documents/ctcfs2011.pdf. Accessed on 5 July 2016.
Pati, D. (2005). Maximizing the benefits of courthouse POEs in design decision support and academic inquiry through a unified conceptual model. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology Retrieved from Georgia Institute of Technology SMARTech Database. hdl.handle.net/1853/6843. Accessed on 1 May 2016.
Preiser, W. F. E., & Schramm, U. (1997). Building performance evaluation. In D. Watson, M. Crosbie, & J. H. Callender (Eds.), Time-saver standards for architectural design data (7th ed., pp. 231–238). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. C. (Eds.) (2005). Assessing building performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier (republished in 2015, London: Routledge).
Preiser, W. F. E., Davis, A. T., Salama, A. M., & Hardy, A. E. (Eds.). (2015). Architecture beyond criticism: Expert judgment and performance evaluation. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Persky, E., Farbstein, J., Farling, M. (2018). Informed Design: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation Toolkit for Courthouses. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)