Abstract
Achieving a desirable quality of landscape depends on several institutions of action. In the public sector, implementation depends on staff attitudes to landscape economics. In the private sector, negotiation, persuasion, and particularly financial incentives encourage provision of positive landscape externalities. Finance should generally be linked directly to beneficial aesthetic output, rather than just to encouragement of economic activity. The third sector may need not just financial resources, but encouragement, including to taking landscape economics seriously.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banerjee, S., de Vries, F. P., Hanley, N., & van Soest, D. P. (2014). The impact of information provision on agglomeration bonus performance: An experimental study on local networks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96, 1009–1029.
Bowers, J. K., & Cheshire, P. (1983). Agriculture, the countryside and land use—An economic critique. London: Methuen.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
Dabbert, S., Dubgaard, A., Slangen, L., & Whitby, M. (Eds.). (1998). The economics of landscape and wildlife conservation. Wallingford: CAB International.
Dümpelmann, S. (2015). An introduction to landscape design and economics. Landscape Research, 40, 555–565.
Dwyer, J., & Hodge, I. (1996). Countryside in trust: Land management by conservation, recreation and amenity organisations. New York: Wiley.
Hampicke, U. (2013). Agricultural conservation measures—Suggestions for their improvement. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 203–214.
Hasund, K. P. (2011). Developing environmental policy indicators by criteria—Indicators on the public goods of the Swedish agricultural landscape. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 7–29.
Hodge, I. (2013). The governance of rural landscapes: Property, complexity and policy. In C. M. van der Heide & W. J. M. Heijman (Eds.), The Economic Value of Landscapes (pp. 88–100). Abingdon: Routledge.
Latacz-Lohmann, U. (1998). Mechanisms for the provision of public goods in the countryside. In Dabbert et al. (Eds.), The economics of landscape and wildlife conservation (pp. 173–186). Wallingford: CAB International.
Penker, M., Enengel, B., Mann, C., & Aznar, O. (2013). Understanding landscape stewardship—Lessons to be learned from public service economics. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 54–72.
Penker, M., Mühlmann, P., & Muhar, A. (2014). Volunteering for landscape care—A typology of different civil-society organisations in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 6(2), 21–28.
Price, C. (1971). The effect of tax concessions on social benefit from afforestation. Forestry, 44, 87–94.
Price, C. (2010). Low discount rates and insignificant environmental values. Ecological Economics, 69, 1895–1903.
White, B., & Hanley, N. (2016). Should we pay for ecosystem service outputs, inputs or both? Environmental and Resource Economics, 63, 765–787.
Whitby, M. (1994). Incentives for countryside management. Wallingford: CAB International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Price, C. (2017). Implementing Desired Solutions. In: Landscape Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54872-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54873-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)