Abstract
This chapter examines two particularly productive years in the life of a literary circle and demonstrates the extent to which an emphasis on community—exemplified by Hunt’s writing contests, correspondence, and the establishment of salons—makes this a fertile time for the pagan imagery that recurs in all of these connected authors. Barnett challenges the conventional reading of the relationship between Thomas Love Peacock and Percy Shelley as one of affectionate satire in favor of a more nuanced relationship characterized by influence and collaboration, exemplified by their shared classical studies and the interplays of many of their works (Peacock’s Genius of the Thames and Shelley’s Esdaile Notebook; Peacock’s Ahrimanes and Shelley’s Laon and Cythna; Peacock’s Calidore and Rhododaphne and Shelley’s Alastor and Prometheus Unbound).
I hope you paid your devotions as usual to the Religio Loci, and hung up an evergreen. If you all go on so, there will be a hope some day that old Vansittart & others will be struck with a Panic Terror, and that a voice will be heard along the water saying “The great God Pan is alive again,”—upon which the villagers will leave off starving, and singing profane hymns, and fall to dancing again.
—Leigh Hunt letter to Thomas Jefferson Hogg , 22 January 1818 1
I often revisit Marlow in thought. The curse of this life is, that whatever is once known, can never be unknown. You inhabit a spot, which before you inhabit it, is as indifferent to you as any other spot upon earth, and when, persuaded by some necessity, you think to leave it, you leave it not; it clings to you—and with memories of things, which, in your experience of them, gave no such promise, revenges your desertion. Time flows on, places are changed; friends who were with us, are no longer with us; yet what has been seems yet to be, but barren and stripped of life.
—Percy Shelley letter to Thomas Love Peacock, 4 April 1818 2
Bibliography
Butler, Marilyn. “Myth and Mythmaking in the Shelley Circle,” English Literary History, Vol. 49, No. 1 (Spring 1982): 50–72.
———. Peacock Displayed: A Satirist in His Context. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.
———. “Shelley and the Empire in the East.” In Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World, eds. Betty T. Bennett and Stuart Curran, 158–68. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Cameron, Kenneth Neill. “Shelley and Ahrimanes,” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 2 (1942): 287–95.
Collings, David. Monstrous Society: Reciprocity, Discipline, and the Political Uncanny at the End of Early Modern England. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2009.
Evans, Frank B. III. “Thomas Taylor, Platonist of the Romantic Period,” PMLA, Vol. 55, No. 4 (December 1940): 1060–1079.
Jones, Frederick L. “The Revolt of Islam,” Keats-Shelley Journal, Vol. 9, Part 1 (Winter 1960): 27–33.
Hunt, Leigh. “Young Poets.” In Prose of the British Romantic Movement, ed. John R. Nabholtz, 518–519. New York: Macmillan, 1974.
Notopoulos, James A.The Platonism of Shelley. London: Octagon Books, 1969.
———. “Shelley and Thomas Taylor,” PMLA, Vol. 51, No. 2 (June 1936): 502–517.
Peacock, Thomas Love. Memoirs of Shelley. London: 1858–1860.
Reiman, Donald H. and Neil Fraistat. The Devil’s Walk: A Ballad. Romantic Circles Electronic Editions, 1997. http://www.rc.umd.edu/editions/shelley/devil/index.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnett, S.L. (2017). “The Great God Pan is Alive Again”: Peacock and Shelley in Marlow. In: Romantic Paganism. The New Antiquity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54723-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54723-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54722-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54723-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)