Skip to main content

Nationalism, Banknotes and Islamic Iconography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
State, Nationalism, and Islamization

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy ((PSRPP))

  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the third indicator of Islam’s role in state nationalism; all 66 Turkish and 31 Pakistani banknotes issued since independence are examined for Islamic symbolism. Mosques, portraits and mausoleums of Islamic personalities, and the crescent and star are deemed Islamic symbols. In the case of Turkey, the Ottoman symbols are also viewed as Islamic symbols as, due to their intertwining during the long Ottoman era, Ottoman symbols do evoke Islamic emotions and sentiments. Similarly, for Pakistan, besides the Islamic symbols mentioned above, the Moghul buildings are also counted as Islamic symbols. The analysis demonstrates that the rise and fall in Islam’s role in state nationalism in Turkey and Pakistan based on banknote images follows the pattern seen in Chapters 2 and 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of series E3 and E4 (and, in part, E2), President Inonu’s picture replaced Ataturk’s picture on Turkish banknotes, but this practice was discontinued for E5 and, since then, Ataturk’s picture has graced one side of Turkish banknotes.

  2. 2.

    As seen in Chapter 2 on constitutions, despite pronouncements from the elite, Turkey was not a completely secular state.

  3. 3.

    This medrese, along with others, was closed by the Turkish government in 1925–26; later, it was turned into a museum (Sahin 2006).

  4. 4.

    It was difficult to decide whether to consider him an Ottoman character or an Islamic personality.

  5. 5.

    It was the first Ottoman building to grace the banknotes that was not in Istanbul.

  6. 6.

    A provisional series was issued by the Reserve Bank of India for Pakistan in 1948. This series was similar to the banknotes circulating in India. The only difference was the inscription of “Government of Pakistan” on the Pakistani banknotes. The images on these banknotes were chosen by the British Indian authorities and the portrait of King George VI was displayed on all of them. As the Pakistani elite were not involved in the choice of images, this series has been excluded from the following analysis.

  7. 7.

    The SBP also issued some hajj banknotes for the use of pilgrims going to Saudi Arabia to perform hajj. These banknotes were similar to the regular series, except for the colour and the inscriptions, “For Hajj Pilgrims from Pakistan—For use in Saudi Arabia only” in English and “hajj note” in Urdu. As the images were similar to the regular banknotes, these hajj notes were considered to be the part of the same banknote series.

  8. 8.

    One might ask why General Musharraf did not delete the inscription. The reason could be the fear of a backlash by the religious right. So, a “golden mean” was chosen by not deleting the inscription but making it invisible, so its value as a symbol is lost.

  9. 9.

    Besides the Badshahi mosque, which is counted as an Islamic image.

Bibliography

  • Baskal, Zekeriya. 2004. “Claiming Yunus Emre: Historical Contexts and the Politics of Reception.” PhD: The University of Wisconsin, Madison. http://search.proquest.com.mutex.gmu.edu/pqdtglobal/docview/305109816/abstract/99651AF988A54E3BPQ/1.

  • Campbell, J. L. 2011. Architecture and Identity: The Occupation, Use, and Reuse of Mughal Caravanserais. University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, Gerald, and Debbie Caskey. 2013. Turkish Delight. WestBow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, Burhanettin. 2016. “Comparing Erdoğan with Mustafa Kemal and Sultan Abdulhamid.” Daily Sabah, October 7. http://www.dailysabah.com/columns/duran-burhanettin/2016/10/07/comparing-erdogan-with-mustafa-kemal-and-sultan-abdulhamid.

  • Freely, John. 2011. A History of Ottoman Architecture. WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Harcourt. 2008. “Civitatis Ghaniensis Conditor: Kwame Nkrumah, Symbolic Nationalism and the Iconography of Ghanaian Money 1957–the Golden Jubilee.” Nations and Nationalism 14 (3): 520–541. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00345.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Emily. 1999. “Forging a National Currency: Money, State-Building and Nation-Making in Canada.” In Nation-States and Money: The Past, Present and Future of National Currencies, edited by Emily Gilbert and Eric Helleiner. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric. 1998. “National Currencies and National Identities.” American Behavioral Scientist 41 (10): 1409–1436. doi:10.1177/0002764298041010004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, V., and T. Unwin. 2004. “Reconstructing National Identities: The Banknotes of Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s.” In Crisis and Renewal in Twentieth Century Banking: Exploring the History and Archives of Banking at Times of Political and Social Stress, edited by Edwin Green, John R. Lampe, and Franjo Stiblar. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince, Basak. 2012. Citizenship and Identity in Turkey: From Atatürk’s Republic to the Present Day. I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifchez, R. (ed.) 1992. The Dervish Lodge: Architecture, Art, and Sufism in Ottoman Turkey. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointon, Marica. 1998. “Money and Nationalism.” In Imagining Nations, edited by Geoffrey Cubitt. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, Ursula, Irene Markoff, Yildiray Erdener, and Karl Signell. 2008. “Turkey: An Overview.” In The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: The Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia. Edited by Ellen Koskoff et. al. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabah. 2016. “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dan Iki Mesaj.” Sabah, December 27. http://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2016/12/27/cumhurbaskani-erdogandan-iki-mesaj.

  • Sahin, S. 2006. “Sivas Gok Medrese (Sahibiye Medrese) Ve Kitabelerindeki Rivayetlerin Hadis Degeri.” Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Ilahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi X (1): 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach, Alexis. 1999. Portraits of the Nation: Stamps, Coins and Banknotes in Belgium and Switzerland 1880–1945. Bern; New York: Peter Lang Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Marlise. 1993. “Center of Ottoman Power.” New York Times, August 22. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/22/travel/center-of-ottoman-power.html.

  • Sinclair, T. A. 1989. Eastern Turkey: An Architectural & Archaeological Survey, Volume I. Pindar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somel, Selcuk Aksin. 2003. Historical Dictionary of the Ottoman Empire. Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TCMB (Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey). 2017. “Banknotes of the Republic of Turkey”. Retrieved December 20, 2014. http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TCMB+EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/BANKNOTES/Banknotes+of+the+Republic+of+Turkey

  • Tschoegl, Adrian E. 2004. “Change the Regime–Change the Money: Bulgarian Banknotes, 1885–2003.” Balkanologie. Revue D’études Pluridisciplinaires 8 (2). http://balkanologie.revues.org/533.

  • Unwin, T., and V. Hewitt. 2001. “Banknotes and National Identity in Central and Eastern Europe.” Political Geography 20 (8): 1005–1028. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00042-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waseem, Mohammad. 1996. “Ethnic Conflict in Pakistan: The Case of MQM.” The Pakistan Development Review 35 (4): 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymans, Jacques E. 2005. “International Patterns in National Identity Content: The Case of Japanese Banknote Iconography.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5: 315–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saleem, R.M.A. (2017). Nationalism, Banknotes and Islamic Iconography. In: State, Nationalism, and Islamization. Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54006-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics