Skip to main content

The Dignity of Doxa: Politicizing Kant’s Aesthetic Judgment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hannah Arendt's Theory of Political Action

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 627 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 6 studies Arendt’s adaptation of Kant’s theory of aesthetic judgment as a model for political judgment, without the guidance of absolute standards. The responsibility to judge the unprecedented arises from the appearance of totalitarianism, which dissolves the reliability of common ethical standards, yet introduces acts whose novelty must still be understood. Reflective judgment serves as an ethical limitation to agonistic action and is crucial to non-violent, responsible ‘world’ building, given the condition of plurality. I proceed to question whether the purpose of a community of spectators is to reach rational consensus and the convergence of opinion, or whether judgment is an end in itself as an affirmation of freedom and plurality. Finally, I illuminate the similarity between Kant’s ‘genius’ and Arendt’s ‘daimon.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 475–78.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 476–77.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 351–52.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., 465.

  5. 5.

    Arendt, “Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship” in Responsibility and Judgment, 24.

  6. 6.

    Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 238.

  7. 7.

    Bilsky, 266–67.

  8. 8.

    Arendt, “Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship,” 20.

  9. 9.

    Curtis, 134.

  10. 10.

    Riley, 390.

  11. 11.

    Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 93–94.

  12. 12.

    Ricoeur, The Just, 101.

  13. 13.

    Arendt, “Crisis in Culture” in Between Past and Future, 221.

  14. 14.

    Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 92.

  15. 15.

    Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 262.

  16. 16.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 5.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 56.

  18. 18.

    Bernstein, 231.

  19. 19.

    Marshall, 370.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 377.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Passerin d’Entreves, 104.

  24. 24.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 31.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 159–60.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 45–46.

  27. 27.

    Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 223.

  28. 28.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 40.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 42.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 80.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., 66–68.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., 80.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., 43.

  34. 34.

    Ibid.

  35. 35.

    Ibid., 44.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., 72.

  37. 37.

    Ibid., 73.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., 70.

  39. 39.

    Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 210.

  40. 40.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 55.

  41. 41.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 70.

  42. 42.

    Ibid., 69.

  43. 43.

    Ricoeur, The Just, 96–98.

  44. 44.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 170–71.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., 63–67.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., 32–33.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 161–62.

  48. 48.

    Ibid., 175.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., 153.

  50. 50.

    Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 98.

  51. 51.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 43.

  52. 52.

    Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 241.

  53. 53.

    Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 156.

  54. 54.

    Benhabib, 191.

  55. 55.

    Fraser, 171.

  56. 56.

    Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 172–73.

  57. 57.

    Young, 206.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., 211, 214.

  59. 59.

    Ibid., 215.

  60. 60.

    Ibid., 219.

  61. 61.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 173.

  62. 62.

    Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 96–97.

  63. 63.

    Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 221.

  64. 64.

    Ibid.

  65. 65.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 74.

  66. 66.

    Fraser, 171.

  67. 67.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 40.

  68. 68.

    Fraser, 172.

  69. 69.

    Ibid., 175.

  70. 70.

    Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 148.

  71. 71.

    Habermas, 184–85.

  72. 72.

    Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 151–54.

  73. 73.

    Marshall, 384.

  74. 74.

    Ibid., 383.

  75. 75.

    Ibid., 372.

  76. 76.

    Benhabib, 199–203.

  77. 77.

    Villa, Arendt and Heidegger, 70–71.

  78. 78.

    Ibid., 165.

  79. 79.

    Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 143.

  80. 80.

    Curtis, 142.

  81. 81.

    Markell, “The Rule of the People,” 12–13.

  82. 82.

    Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 159–61.

  83. 83.

    Ibid., 162–63.

  84. 84.

    Ibid., 171.

  85. 85.

    Ibid., 179.

  86. 86.

    Zerilli, “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment,” 8.

  87. 87.

    Ibid., 25.

  88. 88.

    Ibid., 9.

  89. 89.

    Cascardi, 107–14.

  90. 90.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 101–10.

  91. 91.

    Ibid., 129.

  92. 92.

    Ibid., 130.

  93. 93.

    Ibid., 111.

  94. 94.

    Ibid., 109.

  95. 95.

    Ibid., 121.

  96. 96.

    Fraser, 168.

  97. 97.

    Ibid., 169.

  98. 98.

    Ibid., 170.

  99. 99.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 77. My emphasis.

  100. 100.

    Ibid., 44.

  101. 101.

    Ibid., 15.

  102. 102.

    Ibid., 19–20.

  103. 103.

    Ibid., 48–49.

  104. 104.

    Ibid., 50.

  105. 105.

    Bernstein, 233.

  106. 106.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 52–53.

  107. 107.

    Ibid., 48.

  108. 108.

    Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 141.

  109. 109.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 15.

  110. 110.

    Ibid., 60.

  111. 111.

    Ibid., 75.

  112. 112.

    Ibid.

  113. 113.

    Ibid., 76.

  114. 114.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 50.

  115. 115.

    Ibid., 67–68.

  116. 116.

    Ibid., 30.

  117. 117.

    Ricoeur, The Just, 96–98.

  118. 118.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 76.

  119. 119.

    Ibid., 85.

  120. 120.

    Ibid., 77.

  121. 121.

    Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 248.

  122. 122.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 81–85.

  123. 123.

    Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 247–48.

  124. 124.

    Ricoeur, The Just, 100.

  125. 125.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 188–90.

  126. 126.

    Ibid., 190.

  127. 127.

    Arendt, Human Condition, 179–80.

  128. 128.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 63.

  129. 129.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 197–205.

  130. 130.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 62–63.

  131. 131.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 190–93.

  132. 132.

    Ibid., 206.

  133. 133.

    Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 63.

  134. 134.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 197–202.

  135. 135.

    Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 181.

  136. 136.

    Arendt, Human Condition, 179–80. I explore the significance of the ‘daimon’ figure most fully in Chapter 3.

  137. 137.

    Kristeva, 74.

  138. 138.

    Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 223.

  139. 139.

    Ibid.

  140. 140.

    Ibid., 225–26.

Bibliography

  • Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future. Enlarged edition. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. Responsibility and Judgment. Edited by Jerome Kohn. New York: Schocken Books, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, Ronald. “Hannah Arendt on Judging.” In Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, Ronald. “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard. Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsky, Leora. “When Actor and Spectator Meet in the Courtroom: Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Judgment.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, Anthony J. “Communication and Transformation: Aesthetics and Politics in Kant and Arendt.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Kimberley. Our Sense of the Real: Aesthetic Experience and Arendtian Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disch, Lisa. “‘Please Sit Down, but Don’t Make Yourself at Home’: Arendtian ‘Visiting’ and the Prefigurative Politics of Consciousness-Raising.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. “Communication, Transformation, and Consciousness-Raising.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by J.H. Bernard. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. Hannah Arendt. Translated by Ross Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markell, Patchen. “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Arche, and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 1 (2006): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, David L. “The Origin and Character of Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Judgment.” Political Theory 38, no. 3 (2010): 367–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passerin d’Entreves, Maurizio. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. New York: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. The Just. Translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Patrick. “Hannah Arendt on Kant, Truth and Politics.” Political Studies 35, no. 3 (1987): 379–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Dana. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, Linda M.G. “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.” Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005): 158–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, Linda M.G. “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason.” Political Theory 40, no. 1 (2012): 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tchir, T. (2017). The Dignity of Doxa: Politicizing Kant’s Aesthetic Judgment. In: Hannah Arendt's Theory of Political Action. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53438-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics