Abstract
Chapter 6 studies Arendt’s adaptation of Kant’s theory of aesthetic judgment as a model for political judgment, without the guidance of absolute standards. The responsibility to judge the unprecedented arises from the appearance of totalitarianism, which dissolves the reliability of common ethical standards, yet introduces acts whose novelty must still be understood. Reflective judgment serves as an ethical limitation to agonistic action and is crucial to non-violent, responsible ‘world’ building, given the condition of plurality. I proceed to question whether the purpose of a community of spectators is to reach rational consensus and the convergence of opinion, or whether judgment is an end in itself as an affirmation of freedom and plurality. Finally, I illuminate the similarity between Kant’s ‘genius’ and Arendt’s ‘daimon.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 475–78.
- 2.
Ibid., 476–77.
- 3.
Ibid., 351–52.
- 4.
Ibid., 465.
- 5.
Arendt, “Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship” in Responsibility and Judgment, 24.
- 6.
Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 238.
- 7.
Bilsky, 266–67.
- 8.
Arendt, “Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship,” 20.
- 9.
Curtis, 134.
- 10.
Riley, 390.
- 11.
Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 93–94.
- 12.
Ricoeur, The Just, 101.
- 13.
Arendt, “Crisis in Culture” in Between Past and Future, 221.
- 14.
Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 92.
- 15.
Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 262.
- 16.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 5.
- 17.
Ibid., 56.
- 18.
Bernstein, 231.
- 19.
Marshall, 370.
- 20.
Ibid., 377.
- 21.
Ibid.
- 22.
Ibid.
- 23.
Passerin d’Entreves, 104.
- 24.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 31.
- 25.
Ibid., 159–60.
- 26.
Ibid., 45–46.
- 27.
Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 223.
- 28.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 40.
- 29.
Ibid., 42.
- 30.
Ibid., 80.
- 31.
Ibid., 66–68.
- 32.
Ibid., 80.
- 33.
Ibid., 43.
- 34.
Ibid.
- 35.
Ibid., 44.
- 36.
Ibid., 72.
- 37.
Ibid., 73.
- 38.
Ibid., 70.
- 39.
Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 210.
- 40.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 55.
- 41.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 70.
- 42.
Ibid., 69.
- 43.
Ricoeur, The Just, 96–98.
- 44.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 170–71.
- 45.
Ibid., 63–67.
- 46.
Ibid., 32–33.
- 47.
Ibid., 161–62.
- 48.
Ibid., 175.
- 49.
Ibid., 153.
- 50.
Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 98.
- 51.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 43.
- 52.
Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 241.
- 53.
Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 156.
- 54.
Benhabib, 191.
- 55.
Fraser, 171.
- 56.
Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 172–73.
- 57.
Young, 206.
- 58.
Ibid., 211, 214.
- 59.
Ibid., 215.
- 60.
Ibid., 219.
- 61.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 173.
- 62.
Beiner, “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures,” 96–97.
- 63.
Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 221.
- 64.
Ibid.
- 65.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 74.
- 66.
Fraser, 171.
- 67.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 40.
- 68.
Fraser, 172.
- 69.
Ibid., 175.
- 70.
Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 148.
- 71.
Habermas, 184–85.
- 72.
Disch, “Please Sit Down,” 151–54.
- 73.
Marshall, 384.
- 74.
Ibid., 383.
- 75.
Ibid., 372.
- 76.
Benhabib, 199–203.
- 77.
Villa, Arendt and Heidegger, 70–71.
- 78.
Ibid., 165.
- 79.
Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 143.
- 80.
Curtis, 142.
- 81.
Markell, “The Rule of the People,” 12–13.
- 82.
Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 159–61.
- 83.
Ibid., 162–63.
- 84.
Ibid., 171.
- 85.
Ibid., 179.
- 86.
Zerilli, “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment,” 8.
- 87.
Ibid., 25.
- 88.
Ibid., 9.
- 89.
Cascardi, 107–14.
- 90.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 101–10.
- 91.
Ibid., 129.
- 92.
Ibid., 130.
- 93.
Ibid., 111.
- 94.
Ibid., 109.
- 95.
Ibid., 121.
- 96.
Fraser, 168.
- 97.
Ibid., 169.
- 98.
Ibid., 170.
- 99.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 77. My emphasis.
- 100.
Ibid., 44.
- 101.
Ibid., 15.
- 102.
Ibid., 19–20.
- 103.
Ibid., 48–49.
- 104.
Ibid., 50.
- 105.
Bernstein, 233.
- 106.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 52–53.
- 107.
Ibid., 48.
- 108.
Beiner, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” 141.
- 109.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 15.
- 110.
Ibid., 60.
- 111.
Ibid., 75.
- 112.
Ibid.
- 113.
Ibid., 76.
- 114.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 50.
- 115.
Ibid., 67–68.
- 116.
Ibid., 30.
- 117.
Ricoeur, The Just, 96–98.
- 118.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 76.
- 119.
Ibid., 85.
- 120.
Ibid., 77.
- 121.
Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 248.
- 122.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 81–85.
- 123.
Arendt, “Truth and Politics,” 247–48.
- 124.
Ricoeur, The Just, 100.
- 125.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 188–90.
- 126.
Ibid., 190.
- 127.
Arendt, Human Condition, 179–80.
- 128.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 63.
- 129.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 197–205.
- 130.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 62–63.
- 131.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 190–93.
- 132.
Ibid., 206.
- 133.
Arendt, Lectures on Kant, 63.
- 134.
Kant, Critique of Judgment, 197–202.
- 135.
Zerilli, “We Feel Our Freedom,” 181.
- 136.
Arendt, Human Condition, 179–80. I explore the significance of the ‘daimon’ figure most fully in Chapter 3.
- 137.
Kristeva, 74.
- 138.
Arendt, “Crisis in Culture,” 223.
- 139.
Ibid.
- 140.
Ibid., 225–26.
Bibliography
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future. Enlarged edition. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, 1994.
Arendt, Hannah. Responsibility and Judgment. Edited by Jerome Kohn. New York: Schocken Books, 2003.
Beiner, Ronald. “Hannah Arendt on Judging.” In Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Beiner, Ronald. “Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Benhabib, Seyla. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
Bernstein, Richard. Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986.
Bilsky, Leora. “When Actor and Spectator Meet in the Courtroom: Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Judgment.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Cascardi, Anthony J. “Communication and Transformation: Aesthetics and Politics in Kant and Arendt.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.
Curtis, Kimberley. Our Sense of the Real: Aesthetic Experience and Arendtian Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Disch, Lisa. “‘Please Sit Down, but Don’t Make Yourself at Home’: Arendtian ‘Visiting’ and the Prefigurative Politics of Consciousness-Raising.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.
Fraser, Nancy. “Communication, Transformation, and Consciousness-Raising.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.
Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by J.H. Bernard. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000.
Kristeva, Julia. Hannah Arendt. Translated by Ross Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
Markell, Patchen. “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Arche, and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 1 (2006): 1–14.
Marshall, David L. “The Origin and Character of Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Judgment.” Political Theory 38, no. 3 (2010): 367–93.
Passerin d’Entreves, Maurizio. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. New York: Routledge, 1994.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Just. Translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Riley, Patrick. “Hannah Arendt on Kant, Truth and Politics.” Political Studies 35, no. 3 (1987): 379–92.
Villa, Dana. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Young, Iris Marion. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Zerilli, Linda M.G. “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.” Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005): 158–88.
Zerilli, Linda M.G. “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason.” Political Theory 40, no. 1 (2012): 6–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tchir, T. (2017). The Dignity of Doxa: Politicizing Kant’s Aesthetic Judgment. In: Hannah Arendt's Theory of Political Action. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53438-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53438-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53437-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53438-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)