Abstract
By invading many areas traditionally covered by philosophy, modern science has made philosophy increasingly irrelevant, and has presented it with the challenge to legitimate itself. This challenge has not been successfully met, so much so that several scientists, and even some philosophers, have concluded that philosophy is dead and has dissolved into the sciences. The question then arises whether philosophy can still be fruitful, and what kind of philosophy can be such. This book attempts to give an answer to this question, reviving the ancient view that philosophy is the acquiring of knowledge. This involves rethinking knowledge and methods to acquire knowledge, including mathematical knowledge, which raises special problems. In addition to describing the aim of the book, the introduction briefly describes the parts and the individual chapters of the book, and outlines some conventions adopted in the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, Ross. 2012. Has physics made philosophy and religion obsolete? Interview to Lawrence Krauss. The Atlantic, April 23.
Cellucci, Carlo. 2013a. Rethinking logic: Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution, and method. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dyson, Freeman. 2012. What can you really know? The New York Review of Books 59(17, November 8): 18–20.
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1998. Reason in the age of science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Galilei, Galileo. 1968. Opere. Florence: Barbera.
Hawking, Stephen, and Leonard Mlodinow. 2010. The grand design. New York: Bantam Books.
Heidegger, Martin. 1968. What is called thinking? New York: Harper & Row.
———. 1972. On time and being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 1994. Basic questions of philosophy: Selected ‘problems’ of ‘logic’. Bloomington: Indiana University Pres.
———. 1998. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
———. 2002. Philosophy as rigorous science. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 2: 249–295.
Pinker, Steven. 2002. The blank slate. The modern denial of human nature. London: Penguin Books.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1974. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1969. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1991–2007. Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1992. Twenty-five years after. In The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method, ed. Richard Rorty, 371–374. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.
Williams, Bernard. 2006. Philosophy as a humanistic discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2002. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cellucci, C. (2017). Introduction. In: Rethinking Knowledge. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53236-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53237-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)