Skip to main content

Mutual Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hans-Georg Gadamer

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSKEY))

  • 741 Accesses

Abstract

To understand something, argues Gadamer, is to understand it on its own historical terms and from one’s own historically defined perspective. Hermeneutics—focusing, as it always has, on linguistic expression—provided Gadamer with a tradition within which to explore this insight. He sought to show how our understanding is bounded by our temporal horizons and that to deepen and extend our understanding we need to fuse those horizons: hence his emphasis on ‘the fusion of horizons ’. By insisting on the dialogical nature of human understanding, he redirected the hermeneutic tradition towards a greater emphasis on the process of question-and-answer as the enactment of understanding in specific situations and under particular circumstances. Being attentive to what is unfamiliar and strange is a necessary condition of participating in that process of question-and-answer . In becoming educated we become, therefore, more attentive to that what is not immediately intelligible. We become attentive to the other. Education is centrally concerned with the development of human understanding through mutual recognition.

Hermeneutics operates whenever what is said is not immediately intelligible. (Gadamer 1977, 98)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The notion of ‘empty’ time can be traced back to Walter Benjamin’s Theses on the Philosophy of History, in which he criticises the notion ‘historical progress’ on the grounds that it is based on the assumption of ‘a homogenous empty time’ (see Benjamin 2007, 261).

References

  • Achebe, C. (2010). An image of Africa. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (2007). Illuminations: Essays and reflections (H. Zohn, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books (1st published in Frankfurt, Germany, by Suhrkamp Verlag in 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1978). An autobiography. Oxford, New York, Melbourne: Oxford University Press (1st published in 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgement and the lure of technique. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, P. (2012) Dialogue in the classroom. In P. Fairfield (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 77–89). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1973). Concerning empty and ful-filled time (R. P. O’Hara, Trans.). In E. G. Ballard & C. E. Scott (Eds.), Martin Heidegger in Europe and America. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics. (D. E. Ling, Ed. and Trans.). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Relevance of the beautiful and other essays (N. Walker, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1992). Hans-Georg Gadamer on education, poetry, and history: Applied hermeneutics (D. Misgeld & G. Nicholson, Eds.; L. Schmidt & M. Reuss, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). The beginning of philosophy (R. Coltman, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2001). Gadamer in conversation: Reflections and commentary (R. E. Palmer, Ed. and Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). 2nd Revised Edn. London and New York: Continuum. (First published in Germany in 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). A Century of philosophy: A conversation with Riccardo Dottori. (R. Coltman & S. Koepke, Trans.). New York and London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, M. (2014). Refiguring theological hermeneutics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s right: The social foundations of democratic life (J. Ganahl, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2002). On not having the last word: thoughts on our debt to Gadamer, in J. Malpas, U. Arnswald, and J. Kertscher (Eds.), Gadamer’s century: Essays in honour of Hans-Georg Gadamer (pp. 157–172). Cambridge, Mass. and London, England: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, G. (2012). The education of the teacher. In P. Fairfield (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 61–76). London and New York: Continuum

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J., Buckley, A., Cheng, A., Dymoke, S., Spiro, J., & Vincent, J. (2016). The ‘questionableness of things: opening up the conversation. In J. McNiff (Ed.), Values and virtues in education research: Critical perspectives (pp. 110–125). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2004). Humanism and democratic criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1999). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the human sciences. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 126–142). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Nixon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nixon, J. (2017). Mutual Understanding. In: Hans-Georg Gadamer. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52117-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52117-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52116-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52117-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics