Abstract
To understand something, argues Gadamer, is to understand it on its own historical terms and from one’s own historically defined perspective. Hermeneutics—focusing, as it always has, on linguistic expression—provided Gadamer with a tradition within which to explore this insight. He sought to show how our understanding is bounded by our temporal horizons and that to deepen and extend our understanding we need to fuse those horizons: hence his emphasis on ‘the fusion of horizons ’. By insisting on the dialogical nature of human understanding, he redirected the hermeneutic tradition towards a greater emphasis on the process of question-and-answer as the enactment of understanding in specific situations and under particular circumstances. Being attentive to what is unfamiliar and strange is a necessary condition of participating in that process of question-and-answer . In becoming educated we become, therefore, more attentive to that what is not immediately intelligible. We become attentive to the other. Education is centrally concerned with the development of human understanding through mutual recognition.
Hermeneutics operates whenever what is said is not immediately intelligible. (Gadamer 1977, 98)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The notion of ‘empty’ time can be traced back to Walter Benjamin’s Theses on the Philosophy of History, in which he criticises the notion ‘historical progress’ on the grounds that it is based on the assumption of ‘a homogenous empty time’ (see Benjamin 2007, 261).
References
Achebe, C. (2010). An image of Africa. London: Penguin Books.
Benjamin, W. (2007). Illuminations: Essays and reflections (H. Zohn, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books (1st published in Frankfurt, Germany, by Suhrkamp Verlag in 1955).
Collingwood, R. G. (1978). An autobiography. Oxford, New York, Melbourne: Oxford University Press (1st published in 1939).
Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgement and the lure of technique. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Fairfield, P. (2012) Dialogue in the classroom. In P. Fairfield (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 77–89). London and New York: Continuum.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1973). Concerning empty and ful-filled time (R. P. O’Hara, Trans.). In E. G. Ballard & C. E. Scott (Eds.), Martin Heidegger in Europe and America. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics. (D. E. Ling, Ed. and Trans.). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Relevance of the beautiful and other essays (N. Walker, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1992). Hans-Georg Gadamer on education, poetry, and history: Applied hermeneutics (D. Misgeld & G. Nicholson, Eds.; L. Schmidt & M. Reuss, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). The beginning of philosophy (R. Coltman, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2001). Gadamer in conversation: Reflections and commentary (R. E. Palmer, Ed. and Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). 2nd Revised Edn. London and New York: Continuum. (First published in Germany in 1960).
Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). A Century of philosophy: A conversation with Riccardo Dottori. (R. Coltman & S. Koepke, Trans.). New York and London: Continuum.
Grau, M. (2014). Refiguring theological hermeneutics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s right: The social foundations of democratic life (J. Ganahl, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press
MacIntyre, A. (2002). On not having the last word: thoughts on our debt to Gadamer, in J. Malpas, U. Arnswald, and J. Kertscher (Eds.), Gadamer’s century: Essays in honour of Hans-Georg Gadamer (pp. 157–172). Cambridge, Mass. and London, England: The MIT Press.
Nicholson, G. (2012). The education of the teacher. In P. Fairfield (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 61–76). London and New York: Continuum
Nixon, J., Buckley, A., Cheng, A., Dymoke, S., Spiro, J., & Vincent, J. (2016). The ‘questionableness of things: opening up the conversation. In J. McNiff (Ed.), Values and virtues in education research: Critical perspectives (pp. 110–125). London and New York: Routledge.
Said, E. W. (2004). Humanism and democratic criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sennett, R. (1999). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the human sciences. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 126–142). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nixon, J. (2017). Mutual Understanding. In: Hans-Georg Gadamer. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52117-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52117-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52116-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52117-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)