Abstract
In the introductory chapter of the book we present the framework for network dynamics and management based on a comprehensive practice-based perspective. The framework serves as platform through which it is possible to figure out the holistic system-like nature of networking. In the framework, we use ideas adapted from the strategy-as-practice research literature and propose a specific networks-as-practice model. The framework introduces three categories of networking practices that we assume to grasp a great deal of inter-organizational interaction: networks-as-coordinated social systems, networks-as-knowledge-creating platforms, and networks-as-value-generating entities.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Throughout the book we use the term “network” as a general expression for various network constellations (dyadic business relationships, groups of firms, and even business ecosystems). If the term “network” refers to a certain type of network, it is defined more closely.
- 2.
The term “tool” is defined as a generic name for frameworks, concepts, models, or methods.
- 3.
Dimecc, the Digital, Internet, Materials & Engineering Co-Creation Company, manages joint research and pre-emptive development actions. The program was funded by TEKES—the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation, 22 participating companies, and 7 participating research institutions.
References
Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5159345&site=ehost-live.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, 8(2), 5–21.
Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6993581&site=ehost-live.
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
Chakrabarti, R., Ramos, C., & Henneberg, S. (2013). Network dynamics in the UK pharmaceutical network—A network-as-practice perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 356–371. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.12.009.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. doi:10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632.
Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586. doi:10.1002/smj.1975.
Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A.-P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65–87. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x.
Hsiao, R.-L., Tsai, D.-H., & Lee, C.-F. (2012). Collaborative knowing: The adaptive nature of cross-boundary spanning. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 463–491. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01024.x.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537–558. doi:10.1002/smj.2270.
Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363 Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2017254.2017262.
March, J. G. (2006). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 201–214. doi:10.1002/smj.515.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108–1136. doi:10.1177/0149206311407507.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295.Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6815445&site=ehost-live
Romme, A. G. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.
Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Association Review, 68(2), 1–16. doi:10.2307/1816653.
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0435.
van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x.
van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x.
Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship—A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634. doi:10.1177/0170840606064101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vesalainen, J., Valkokari, K., Hellström, M. (2017). Introduction. In: Vesalainen, J., Valkokari, K., Hellström, M. (eds) Practices for Network Management . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49649-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49649-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49648-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49649-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)