Skip to main content

Sousveillance as a Tool in US Civic Polity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spaces of Surveillance
  • 878 Accesses

Abstract

In this section of the collection, the intrusion that surveillance or sousveillance performs on the body and the self are explored. This chapter explores the potential of sousveillance, or the recording of an activity by a participant in the activity, to facilitate the notion of the American democracy. Given that sousveillance is a relatively modern form of surveillance, this chapter unveils the historical background of sousveillance, noting its connections to surveillance and classic discussions of power and political theory. Next, this chapter discusses how the intersection of technology, art, and politics, residing in a nexus between public and private, reveals how surveillance permeates contemporary culture. I contend that a conceptualization of what an engaged citizen looks like in the twenty-first century requires a good grasp of sousveillance and its attendant meanings. Sousveillance is inculcated in modern citizenship, as previous chapters have discussed, and so its prevalence is has consequences for communities, policy makers, artists, writers and academics more than ever before. This form of monitoring has body-specific and social reactions which deeply affect the performance of personhood in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, V. (2010). Sousveillance, media and strategic political communication: Iraq, USA, UK. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J., & Bozovic, M. (1995). The panopticon writings. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin, D. (1990). Earth. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. (1985). Snow. In J. C. Oates (Ed.), American gothic tales. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1993). John Dewey responds. In D. Morris & I. Shapiro (Eds.), John Dewey: The political writings (pp. 246–248). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernback, J. (2013). Sousveillance: Communities of resistance to the surveillance environment. Telematics and Informatics, 30, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, H. (2004). Webcams, TV shows, and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W., & Wander, P. (1998). On discursive amnesia: Reinventing the possibilities for democracy through discursive amnesty. In M. Salvador & P. M. Sias (Eds.), The public voice in a democracy at risk (pp. 151–172). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., & Niedzviecki, H. (2001). Cyborg: Digital destiny and human possibility in the age of the wearable computer. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2003). Cyborg logs and collective stream of (de)consciousness capture for producing attribution-free informatics content such as cyborlogs. First Monday, 8(2). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1030/951.

  • Mann, S. (2004). Sousveillance: Inverse surveillance in multimedia imaging (pp. 620–627).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., Nolan, J., & Wellman, B. (2003). Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, K. (2015). Sousveillance: Implications for privacy, security, trust, and the law. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (2009). The Societal Benefits of Data-Sharing. Retrieved from http://www.1to1media.com/View.aspx?DocId=31350.

  • Posthuman Studios, LLC. (2009). Eclipse Phase Core Rulebook. Retrieved from http://www.eclipsephase.com/releases/eclipse-phase-core-rulebook.

  • Sawyer, R. (2002–2003). Neanderthal Parallax. New York: Tor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2004). What have We Done? Retrieved from http://www.24Mserendipity.li/iraqwar/susan_sontag_what_have_we_done.htm.

  • Stampler, L. (2014). This ‘bra cam’ shows how often women’s breasts get ogled. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://time.com/3449830/nestle-bra-cam-breasts/.

  • Sterling, B. (2006). Alberto Frigo. Wired Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange Days. (2004). Directed by K. Bigelow [Film]. USA: 20th century Fox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stross, C. (2007). Halting state. New York: Ace Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stross, C. (2011). Rule 34. New York: Ace Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2015). For 11 years, this man has taken photos of everything his right hand touches. Fast Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Ryan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryan, M. (2017). Sousveillance as a Tool in US Civic Polity. In: Flynn, S., Mackay, A. (eds) Spaces of Surveillance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49085-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics