Skip to main content

Identifying Relevant Versus Received Sustainability Education at Industrial Engineering and Management Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 960 Accesses

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Implementing and evaluating sustainable development in higher education poses particular difficulties, as the field remains contested. This paper presents an innovative approach to understanding the current sustainability education at university programs and envisioning its desired future state. This approach is based on the convergence seen in current scientific literature within the field. This study utilized this method on Sweden’s five largest industrial engineering and management programs (covering 74 % of the particular population), involving 111 interviews and resulting in identification of the relevant sustainability content and mapping of the received content at these programs. This paper documents the process-oriented, as supposed to results-oriented, approach used, as well as certain key results and insights. The revealed adoption challenges were structured according to their interconnectedness, allowing points of high leverage to be found for future interventions. This paper is appealing to all who wish to conduct pre-studies to engaging in developing program curricula at larger scale through collaboration between various universities. The paper will outline the process, the key success factors (as identified by the author) and the insights that have a bearing on a broader audience than industrial engineering faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antagning.se. (2015). Universitets- och Högskolerådets antagningsstatistik (University and College admission statistics). Antagning.se, http://statistik.uhr.se. Last accessed October 19, 2015.

  • Becker, E., Jahn, T., & Stiess, I. (1999). Sustainability and the social sciences, a cross-disciplinary approach integrating environmental considerations into theoretical orientation. London, United Kingdom: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (2012). Teaching engineering ethics with sustainability as context. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carew, A., & Mitchell, C. (2007). Teaching Sustainability as a contested concept: Capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers Technical University. (2010). Alumni 2010—Industriell Ekonomi. Technology’s economy and organisation. Gothenburg: Chalmers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research (3rd ed.). Houndmills, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, J.-E. (2014). Hållbar Utveckling (Sustainable Development). Lund Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B., & Petersen, A. (2009). Conceptualizing sustainable development: An assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios. Ecological Economics, 68, 1006–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson-Björnberg, K., Skogh, I.-B., & Strömberg, E. (2015). Integrating social sustainability in engineering education at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(5), 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden, G. (2015). Vice-president of sustainability. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Interviewed by Niccolas Albiz on the Match 27, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanning, A., Abelsson, A., Lundqvist, U., & Svanström, M. (2010). Are we educating engineers for sustainability? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, M. (2015). Chairman of the board of industrial engineering and logistics. Linköping: Linköping University. Interviewed by Niccolas Albiz on the April 15, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • I-sektionens Alumnutskott. (2013). Alumnrapport 2013 (Alumni report 2013). Lund: Lund’s Technical University, Association of Industrial Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • I-sektionens Alumnutskott. (2011). Placement Report 2011—en rapport om Iares första anställning (Placement Report 2011—A report about I-students first employment). Linköping’s University, Association of Industrial Engineers, Linköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • I-Sektionens Alumnutskott. (2012). Placement report 2012. Linköping: Linköping’s University, Association of Industrial Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, D. (2002). Vad, hur och varför: om metodval i företagsekonomi och andra samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen (What, how and why: About method choices in business and other social science subjects). Lund: Lund Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • KTH-Sustainability. (2014). Precisering av övergripande lärandemål (Specification of the overarching learning outcomes). KTH-Sustainability. https://www.kth.se/om/miljo-hallbar-utveckling/utbildning-miljo-hallbarutveckling/verktygslada/larande-for-hallbar/outcomes/precisering-av-overgripandelarandemal-1.432077. Last accessed October 21, 2015.

  • Lang, D., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Moll, P., Swilling, M., Stauffacher, M., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in Sustainability Science: Practice, principles and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London, England: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social Sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, K. (2010). Dont Preach. Practice! Value laden statements in academic sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(1), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). (2007). Karriärrapport 2007 (Career report 2007). Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). https://intra.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.172250!/Menu/general/column-content/attachment/Karriärrapport%202007.pdf. Last accessed May 06, 2015.

  • Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). (2010). Karriärrapport 2010 (Career report 2010). Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.272875!/Menu/general/column-content/attachment/Karriärrapport%202010%20(2).pdf. Last accessed May 06, 2015.

  • Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). (2011). Karriärrapport 2011 (Career report 2011). Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.276786!/Menu/general/column-content/attachment/Karriärrapport%202011.pdf. Last accessed May 06, 2015.

  • Strömberg, E. (2015). Project manager at KTH-Sustainability. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Interviewed by Niccolas Albiz on the March 05, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact & Accenture. (2013). UN global compact—Accenture CEO study on Sustainability 2013. Accenture Sustainability Services. Accenture. https://acnprod.accenture.com/~/media/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Strategy_5/Accenture-UN-Global-Compact-Acn-CEO-Study-Sustainability-2013.pdf. Last accessed August 21, 2015.

  • Universitetskanslerämbetet. (2013). Utvärdering av utbildningar inom ingenjörs- och teknikvetenskap 2013—Arbetssätt, resultat, analys och reflektioner (Evaluation of educations within engineering and technology sciences 2013—Methods, Results, Analysis and reflections). http://www2.uk-ambetet.se/download/kvalitet/industriell-ekonomi-2012.pdf. Last accessed August 21, 2015.

  • Wals, A., Tassone, V., Hampson, G., Reams, J. (2015). Chapter 2—Learning for walking the change. In Routledge Handbooks of Higher Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 25–39).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by the warm contributions of over a 100 people from five programs, ten universities and countless departments from all over Sweden. A big thank you to all of you.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niccolas Albiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albiz, N. (2017). Identifying Relevant Versus Received Sustainability Education at Industrial Engineering and Management Programs. In: Leal Filho, W., Mifsud, M., Shiel, C., Pretorius, R. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47895-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics