Skip to main content

Triadic Gaze

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior
  • 50 Accesses

Definition of Triadic Gaze

Triadic gaze requires two individuals (a looking individual and a perceiver) and a third party (an object, event, or a person) as the focus of the attention of the individuals. It involves a relatively more complex information processing mechanism than a dyadic gaze that requires perceivers to identify whether a looking individual’s eyes are directed toward them. To achieve triadic eye gaze, the perceiver must recognize the line of site of the looking individual’s eyes and trace along two invisible lines of the site to their convergent point, that is, the third party of the triad (e.g., an object; Lee et al. 1998). Although triadic eye gaze can also be used to regulate one-to-one social interaction, another major and unique function of triadic eye gaze is that it can be used to reveal an individual’s focus of attention and internal states (desire, goal, etc.; Lee et al. 1998). In the literatures of human developmental studies, triadic gaze that mutually...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer infant interactions. Child Development, 5, 1278–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). All great ape species follow gaze to distant locations and around barriers. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Manhaw: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., & Call, J. (2013). How joint is the joint attention of apes and human infants? In J. Metcalf & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Agency and joint attention (pp. 49–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, P., & Dunham, F. (1995). Optimal social structures and adaptive infant development. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 159–188). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobel, M. S., Kim, H. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). The dual function of social gaze. Cognition, 136, 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J. C., Sarriá, E., & Tamarit, J. (1993). The comparative study of early communication and theories of mind: Ontogeny, phylogeny, and pathology. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds. Perspectives from autism (pp. 397–426). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, T. (2017). The eyes as windows into other minds: An integrative perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jording, M., Hartz, A., Bente, G., Schulte-Rüther, M., & Vogeley, K. (2018). The “social gaze space”: A taxonomy for gaze-based communication in triadic interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 226, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, K., & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Review, 100, 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavens, D. A., & Clark, H. (2017). Joint attention. In J. Vonk & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1075-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavens, D. A., Hopkins, W. D., & Thomas, R. K. (2004). Referential communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Eskritt, M., Symons, L. A., & Muir, D. (1998). Children’s use of triadic eye gaze information for “mind reading”. Developmental Psychology, 34, 525–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyn, H., Greenfield, P. M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Gillespie-Lynch, K., & Hopkins, W. D. (2011). Nonhuman primates do declare! A comparison of declarative symbol and gesture use in two children, two bonobos, and a chimpanzee. Language & Communication, 31, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, C. R. (1999). Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, M., Mundy, P., & Rojas, J. (1998). Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P. (2003). Annotation: The neural basis of social impairments in autism: The role of the dorsal medial-frontal cortex and anterior cingulate system. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 793–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P., & Newell, L. (2007). Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberwelland, E., Schilbach, L., Barisic, I., Krall, S. C., Vogeley, K., Fink, G. R., et al. (2016). Look into my eyes: Investigating joint attention using interactive eye-tracking and fMRI in a developmental sample. NeuroImage, 130, 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto-Barth, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Great apes’ understanding of others’ line of sight. Psychological Science, 18, 462–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy, T. J. (1996). Chimpanzees: Joint visual attention. Psychological Science, 7, 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Developmental link between dyadic and triadic social competence in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 1473–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Hobson, R. P. (2005). The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70 (1, Serial no. 279).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. H. (1998). Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1063–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Hare, B., Lehmann, H., & Call, J. (2007). Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., Matsuzawa, T., Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., Kosugi, D., Mizuno, Y., Okamoto, S., Yamaguchi, M. K., & Bard, K. A. (2004). Development of social cognition in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Face recognition, smiling, gaze, and the lack of triadic interactions. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanae Okamoto-Barth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Okamoto-Barth, S. (2018). Triadic Gaze. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1556-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1556-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics