Skip to main content

Self-Serving Bias

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Synonyms

Benefectance; Egotistical attributions; Self-serving attribution

Definition

Self-serving bias is a psychological strategy referring to the tendency of people to make internal attributions for positive outcomes and external attributions for negative outcomes.

Heider (1958) first enunciated self-serving bias in his explanation of attributions for ambiguous situations. He claimed that attributions are shaped by “a person’s own needs or wishes” (Heider 1958, p. 118). Thus, self-serving bias refers to somewhat distorted explanations and inaccurate interpretations of the given situation as compared to an objective standard. Two accounts have been defined to explain biases in the service of the self: the cognitive account and the motivational account.

The cognitive account states that self-serving bias is a result of limited cognitive capacity rather than a motivated strategy (Miller and Ross 1975). Accordingly, individuals as naïve scientists strive to use the available information...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(4), 441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: An integrative review. In Self-esteem (pp. 55–85). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Schlenker, B. R. (1977). Attributing the causes of group performance: Effects of performance quality, task importance, and future testing. Journal of Personality, 45, 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J., Malone, W., & Sweeny, K. (2008). Exploring the causes of self-serving bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., & Levi, A. (1982). Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Doğruyol, B., Yilmaz, O., Bahçekapili, H.G. (2021). Self-Serving Bias. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1525-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1525-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics