Skip to main content

Optimizing Bio-energy Crop Farm Profitability with Spatial Distribution of Bio-fuel Refinery Sites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biofuels and Bioenergy (BICE2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Energy ((SPE))

  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

With increase in prices of food grains and non-renewable fuel, the scientific community has turned to nature for answers. Biomass and bio-fuel production system must be optimized to enhance bio-fuel production. This can be done with a bio-energy crop production system concentrating on farm profitability and resource energy management. The system defined here stands on climatic and geo-spatial characteristics of potential energy crops, production and availability of infrastructure, socioeconomic parameters, public (subsidies) as well as private fuel consumption, qualitative and quantitative analysis of bio-fuel crops, cultural guards and intrusions. This article presents a linear programming model considering the above parameters as inputs. The model seeks to accurately determine the profitability of each bio-fuel crop pair which can be rotated in a specific geography. Simulations to relate mean distance to bio-refinery and net biomass crop profit are performed for four region specific bio-fuel crop pairs in the United States. The model helps in understanding the connections that agricultural management is having with various parameters connected with production starting from cost of seeds to value of the final biomass in hand. This helps in the derivation of a stochastic model providing an insight on statistical impacts of multiple parameters on improving the feasibility of the proposed bio-fuel production system. This analysis implies closer bio-refinery spacing than current grain elevator spacing under most anticipated circumstances signifying that transportation infrastructure plays a significant, perhaps dominant, role in creating successful regional biofuel production programs and policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LP:

Linear programming

MMR:

Multi-parameter multiplicative regression

References

  1. Parikh JK, Ramanathan R (1999) Linkages among energy, agriculture and environment in rural India. Energy Econ 21:561–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramachandra TV, Shruthi BV (2005) Wind energy potential mapping in Karnataka using GIS. Energy Convers Manag 41(9–10):1561–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dhugga KS (2007) Maize biomass yield and composition of bio fuels. Crop Sci 47(7):2211–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dar DD (2008) Biofuel crops for sustainable global energy production agricultural energy on sustainability, Technology and Development, WIREC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdulfotuh F (2007) Energy efficiency and renewable technologies: the way to sustainable energy future. Desalination 209:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Plappally AK, Lienhard VJH (2013) Cost of water treatment, distribution, end use, and reclamation, desalination and water treatment. Eur Desalination Soc 51: 200–232

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keriko J (2006) The status of biofuels research and production in Kenya. BELP, UC Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christry A, Rismani-Yazdi H (2008) FABE 694, Class notes

    Google Scholar 

  9. Whitaker M, Heath G (2010) Life cycle assessment comparing the use of jatropha biodiesel in the indian road and rail sectors, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-47462 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Platts (2014) Asia’s biofuel prices at historic lows after years of pressure, 31 December 2014, http://www.platts.com/latest-news/agriculture/london/asias-biofuels-prices-at-historic-lows-after-27977913. Accessed 01 Jan 2015

  11. Batte MT (1999) Precision agriculture in the 21st century: geospatial and information technologies in crop management (review). Am J Agric Econ 81(3):755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naylor TH, Byrne ET, Vernon JM (1971) Introduction to linear programming: methods and cases. Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soboyejo ABO, Nestor KE (2000) A New statistical biomechanics approach to modeling of bone strength in Broiler Chickens and Turkeys. Part I—Theoretical Development. Part II—Validation of Theoretical Models. Biological Engineering Technical Paper No. 1: Transaction of American Society of Agricultural Engineers 43(6):1997–2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. USDA (2008) United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Ohio/index.asp

  15. Binns J (2008) Personal communication, John Binns, Madison County, Ohio cash grain producer

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilman EF, Watson DG (1993) Jatropha Integerrima Peregrina, USFS, Fact Sheet ST-319

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips RL (1994) The Coconut. University of Florida Fact Sheet HS-40

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skolmen RG (1983) Growth and yield of some eucalypts of interest in California. Technical Report PSW 69, U.S. Forest Service

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wallander S, Claassen R, Nickerson C (2011) The ethanol decade: an expansion of US corn production, 2000–2009, Economic Information Bulletin Number 79. ERS, USDA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plappally A, Soboyejo A, Fausey N, Soboyejo W, Brown L (2010) Stochastic modeling of filtrate alkalinity in water filtration devices: transport through micro/nano porous clay based ceramic materials. J Nat Environ Sci 1(2):96–105

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soboyejo ABO, Ozkan HE, Papritan JC, Soboyejo WO (2001) A new multiparameter approach to the prediction of wear rates in agricultural sprayer nozzles. J Test Eval 29(4):372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Plappally A, Chen H, Ayinde W, Alayande S, Usoro A, Friedman KC, Dare E, Ogunyale T, Yakub I, Leftwich M, Malatesta K, Rivera R, Brown L, Soboyejo A, Soboyejo W (2011) A field study on the use of clay ceramic water filters and influences on the general health in Nigeria. J Health Behav Public Health 1(1): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ang AH-S, Tang WH (1975) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol I—Basic principles. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duke JA (1983) GTZ: liquid biofuels for transportation, hand book of energy crops

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newman R (2003) Miscanthus practical aspects of biofuel development, ETSU B/W2/00618/REP URN 03/1568, Department of Trade and industry, Final Report Published

    Google Scholar 

  26. GAIN 2006, Australia Grain and Feed, Quarterly update 2006, GAIN Report AS6066, USDA Foreign Agriculture Service

    Google Scholar 

  27. ICRISAT (2008) Innovation for changing world, Annual report 2008. http://www.icrisat.org/what-we-do/publications/annual-reports/icrisat-annualreport-2008.pdf

  28. Katembo BI, Pearl S (2007) Africa, Seeds, and Biofuel, Gray, Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1-1

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh A (2006) Jatropha jeopardizes pastoralist livelihoods. BELP, UC Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  30. BELP (2007) Biofuels and Ecoagriculture—Can Bioenergy Production Enhance Landscape-Scale Ecosystem conservation and local livelihoods? Beahrs Environmental Leadership Program, Alumni newsletter http://beahrselp.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/18_Fall_2007.pdf

  31. Wani SP, Sreedevi TK (2007) Strategy for rehabilitation of degraded land and improved livelihood through biodiesel plantation. Proceeding of 4th international biofuels conference, pp 50–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Prof. Ann Christy for teaching us the subject of Bio-fuels and all our colleagues at the Department of Food Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University who provided constructive comments while we were putting this work together. We also thank the Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur for providing the financial support. We also greatly acknowledge the advice from Prof. Alfred Soboyejo and Prof. Larry C. Brown. We also thank Amrita Kaurwar and Sandeep Gupta for reviewing this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand Plappally .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

(see Table 1; Figs. 7 and 8).

Table 1 Biofuel crops and their geographical and climate suitability
Fig. 7
figure 7

The LP and MMR modeling framework

Fig. 8
figure 8

The spreadsheet implementation of the LP formulation [Microsoft Excel 2010 version, The Ohio State University]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duemmel, K., Plappally, A. (2017). Optimizing Bio-energy Crop Farm Profitability with Spatial Distribution of Bio-fuel Refinery Sites. In: Suresh, S., Kumar, A., Shukla, A., Singh, R., Krishna, C. (eds) Biofuels and Bioenergy (BICE2016). Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47257-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47257-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47255-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47257-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics