Skip to main content

\(\mathbf {LPP_2}\), a Propositional Probability Logic Without Iterations of Probability Operators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Probability Logics

Abstract

The probability logic denoted \(LPP_2\) is described with the aim to give a clear, step-by-step introduction to the field and the main proof techniques that will be used elsewhere in the book. The logic enriches propositional calculus with probabilistic operators of the form \(P_{\ge s}\) with the intended meaning “probability is at least s”. In \(LPP_2\) the operators are applied to propositional formulas, while iterations of probability operators are not allowed. Possible world semantics with a finitely additive probability measure on sets of worlds definable by formulas is defined, so that formulas remain true or false. The corresponding axiomatization is provided. The axiom system is infinitary. It contains an infinitary rule with countable many premisses and one conclusion. The rule is related to the Archimedean property of real numbers. The logic \(LPP_2\) is not compact: there are unsatisfiable sets of formulas that are finitely satisfiable. Some of the consequences of non-compactness are described. Then, soundness and strong completeness of the logic is proved with respect to several classes of probability models. This is followed by a proof of decidability of PSAT, the satisfiability problem for \(LPP_2\), which is NP-complete. Finally, a heuristic approach to PSAT is presented. This Chapter covers some results from Ikodinović et al., Int J Approx Reason, (55):1830–1842, 2014, [3], Jovanović et al., Variable neighborhood search for the probabilistic satisfiability problem, 2007, [4], Kokkinis et al., Logic J. IGPL, (23):662–687, 2015, [5], Ognjanović, J. Logic Comput, (9):181–195, 1999, [6], Ognjanović et al., Theor Comput Sci, (247):191–212, 2000, [7], Ognjanović et al., A genetic algorithm for satisfiability problem in a probabilistic logic, 2001, [8],Ognjanović et al., A Genetic Algorithm for Probabilistic SAT Problem, 2004, [9], Ognjanović et al., A Hybrid Genetic and Variable Neighborhood Descent for Probabilistic SAT Problem, 2005, [10], Ognjanović et al., Zbornik Radova, Subseries Logic in Computer Science, 2009, [11], Rašković and Ognjanović, Some propositional probabilistic logics, 1996, [12], Rašković and Ognjanović, A first order probability logic, \(LP_Q\), 1999, [13], Stojanović et al., Appl Soft Comput, (31):339–347, 2015, [14].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\varphi \) is a syntactical consequence of T.

  2. 2.

    In other words, the length of a proof is an at most countable successor ordinal.

  3. 3.

    A set of formulas, a theory, which is finitely satisfiable, but not realized (satisfiable).

  4. 4.

    Which in the case of \(LPP_2\) coincides with non-isolated types.

  5. 5.

    Theorem 3.2.10 from [1]. Let C be an algebra of subsets of a set \(\varOmega \) and \(\mu (w)\) a positive bounded charge—a finitely additive measure—on C. Let F be an algebra on \(\varOmega \) containing C. Then there exists a positive bounded charge \({\overline{\mu (w)}}\) on F such that \({\overline{\mu (w)}}\) is an extension of \(\mu (w)\) from C to F and that the range of \({\overline{\mu (w)}}\) is a subset of the closure of the range of \(\mu (w)\) on C.

  6. 6.

    Carathéodory theorem 1.3.10 Let \(\mu \) be a measure on the algebra H, and assume that \(\mu \) is \(\sigma \)-finite, i.e.:

    • if \(\mathscr {F}_i \in H\), for \(i \in \mathbb {N}\), and \(\bigcup _i \mathscr {F}_i \in H\), then

    • \(\mu (\bigcup _i \mathscr {F}_i) = \lim _{i} \mu (\mathscr {F}_0 \cup \ldots \cup \mathscr {F}_i)\).

    Then \(\mu \) has a unique extension to a measure on the minimal \(\sigma \)-algebra \(\overline{H}\) over H.

  7. 7.

    Statements about complexity of the satisfiability problem for weight formulas from [2]. |A| and \(\Vert A\Vert \) denote the length of A (the number of symbols required to write A), and the length of the longest coefficient appearing in A, when written in binary, respectively. The size of a rational number a / b, where a and b are relatively prime, is defined to be the sum of lengths of a and b, when written in binary.

    Theorem 2.6 Suppose A is a weight formula that is satisfied in some measurable probability structure. Then A is satisfied in a structure \((S, H, \mu , v)\) with at most |A| states where every set of states is measurable, and where the probability assigned to each state is a rational number with size \(O(|A| \Vert A\Vert + |A| \log (|A|))\).

    Lemma 2.7 If a system of r linear equalities and/or inequalities with integer coefficients each of length at most l has a nonnegative solution, then it has a nonnegative solution with at most r entries positive, and where the size of each member of the solution is \(O(rl + r \log (r))\).

    Lemma 2.8 Let A be a weight formula. Let \(M = (S, H, \mu , v)\) and \(M_0 = (S, H, \mu , v')\) be probability structures with the same underlying probability space \((S, H, \mu )\). Assume that \(v(w,p) = v'(w,p)\) for every state w and every primitive proposition p that appears in A. Then \(M \models A\) iff \(M_0 \models A\).

    Theorem 2.9 The problem of deciding whether a weight formula is satisfiable in a measurable probability structure is \({\mathrm {NP}}\)complete.

References

  1. Bhaskara Rao, K.P.S., Bhaskara Rao, M.: Theory of Charges. Academic Press, New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87(1–2), 78–128 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikodinović, N., Ognjanović, Z., Rašković, M., Perović, A.: Hierarchies of probabilistic logics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(9), 1830–1842 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jovanović, D., Ognjanović, N.M.Z.: Variable neighborhood search for the probabilistic satisfiability problem. In: Doerner, K.F., Gendreau, M., Greistorfer, P., Gutjahr, W., Hartl, R.F., Reimann, M. (eds.) Metaheuristics: Progress in Complex Systems Optimization, Springer Series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 39, pp. 173–188. Springer, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kokkinis, I., Maksimović, P., Ognjanović, Z., Studer, T.: First steps towards probabilistic justification logic. Logic J. IGPL 23(4), 662–687 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ognjanović, Z., Rašković, M.: Some probability logics with new types of probability operators. J. Logic Comput. 9(2), 181–195 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ognjanović, Z., Rašković, M.: Some first-order probability logics. Theor. Comput. Sci. 247(1–2), 191–212 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ognjanović, Z., Kratica J., Milovanović, M.: A genetic algorithm for satisfiability problem in a probabilistic logic: a first report. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS/LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 805– 816. Springer, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ognjanović, Z., Midić, U., Kratica, J.: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing ICAISC 2004, Zakopane, Poland, 7–11 June, 2004. In: Rutkowski, L., Siekmann, J., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) A Genetic Algorithm for Probabilistic SAT Problem. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (LNCS/LNAI), vol. 3070, pp. 462–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ognjanović, Z., Midić, U., Mladenović, N.: Proceedings of the second international workshop on hybrid metaheuristics HM2005, Barcelona, Spain, 29–31 August, 2005. In: Blesa, M.J. (ed.) A Hybrid Genetic and Variable Neighborhood Descent for Probabilistic SAT Problem. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 42–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ognjanović, Z., Rašković, M., Marković, Z.: Probability logics. In: Ognjanović, Z. (ed.) Zbornik Radova, Subseries Logic in Computer Science 12 (20), pp. 35–111. Matematički institut, Beograd (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rašković, M., Ognjanović, Z.: Some propositional probabilistic logics. In: Kovačević-Vujičić, V., Mijajlović, Ž. (eds.) Proceedings of the Kurepa’s symposium 1996, Belgrade, pp. 83–90. Scientific review 19-20 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rašković, M., Ognjanović, Z.: A first order probability logic, \(LP_Q\). Publications de L’Institute Matematique, ns. 65(79), 1–7 (1999). http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/files/journals/publ/85/n079p001.pdf

  14. Stojanović, T., Davidović, T., Ognjanović, Z.: Bee Colony Optimization for the satisfiability problem in probabilistic logic. Appl. Soft Comput. 31, 339–347 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoran Ognjanović .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ognjanović, Z., Rašković, M., Marković, Z. (2016). \(\mathbf {LPP_2}\), a Propositional Probability Logic Without Iterations of Probability Operators. In: Probability Logics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47012-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47012-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47011-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47012-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics