Abstract
Several sources of uncertainty affect how precisely the future status of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) can be forecasted. Foremost are unknowns about the future levels of global greenhouse gas emissions, which could range from an unabated increase to an aggressively mitigated reduction. Uncertainties also arise because different climate models project different amounts and rates of future warming (and sea ice loss)—even for the same emission scenario. There are also uncertainties about how global warming could affect the Arctic Ocean’s food web, so even if climate models project the presence of sea ice in the future, the availability of polar bear prey is not guaranteed. Under a worst-case emission scenario in which rates of greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise unabated to century’s end, the uncertainties about polar bear status center on a potential for extinction. If the species were to persist, it would likely be restricted to a high-latitude refugium in northern Canada and Greenland—assuming a food web also existed with enough accessible prey to fuel weight gains for surviving onshore during the most extreme years of summer ice melt. On the other hand, if emissions were to be aggressively mitigated at the levels proposed in the Paris Climate Agreement, healthy polar bear populations would probably continue to occupy all but the most southern areas of their contemporary summer range. While polar bears have survived previous warming phases—which indicate some resiliency to the loss of sea ice habitat—what is certain is that the present pace of warming is unprecedented and will increasingly expose polar bears to historically novel stressors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amstrup SC, Marcot BG, Douglas DC (2008) A Bayesian network modeling approach to forecasting the 21st century worldwide status of polar bears. In: DeWeaver ET, Bitz CM, Tremblay LB (eds) Arctic Sea ice decline: observations, projections, mechanisms, and implications, American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph No. 180, Washington, pp 213–268
Amstrup SC, DeWeaver ET, Douglas DC et al (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation can reduce sea ice loss and increase polar bear persistence. Nature 468:955–960
Arrigo KR, van Dijken G, Pabi S (2008) Impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production. Geophys Res Lett 35:L19603. doi:10.1029/2008GL035028
Atwood TC, Marcot BG, Douglas DC et al (2016a) Forecasting the relative influence of environmental and anthropogenic stressors on polar bears. Ecosphere 7(6):e01370. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1370
Atwood TC, Peacock E, McKinney M et al (2016b) Rapid environmental change drives increased land use by an Arctic marine predator. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0155932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155932
Barnhart KR, Miller CR, Overeem I et al (2015) Mapping the future expansion of Arctic open water. Nat Clim Chang 6:280–285
Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J et al (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Doschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1029–1136
Durner GM, Douglas DC, Nielson RM et al (2009) Predicting 21st-century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models. Ecol Monogr 79:25–58
Gormezano LJ, Rockwell RF (2015) The energetic value of land-based foods in Western Hudson Bay and their potential to alleviate energy deficits of starving adult male polar pears. PLoS One 10:e0128520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128520
Harwood LA, Smith TG, George JC et al (2015) Change in the Beaufort Sea ecosystem: diverging trends in body condition and/or production in five marine vertebrate species. Prog Oceanogr 136:263–273
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328:1523–1528
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Kirtman B, Power SB, Adedoyin JA et al (2013) Near-term climate change: projections and predictability. In: Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 953–1028
Knutti R (2008) Should we believe model predictions of future climate change? Philos Trans R Soc A 366:4647–4664
Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosci 1:735–743
Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW et al (2010) Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change. Biol Conserv 143:1612–1622
Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW (2014) Corrigendum to “predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change” [Biol Conserv 143 (2010) 1612−1622]. Biol Conserv 177:230–231. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.001
Moore SE, Huntington HP (2008) Arctic marine mammals and climate change: impacts and resilience. Ecol Appl 18(sp2):S157–S165. doi:10.1890/06-0571.1
Obbard ME, Cattet MRL, Howe EJ et al (2016) Trends in body condition in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from the Southern Hudson Bay subpopulation in relation to changes in sea ice. Arct Sci 2:15–32
Overland J, Hanna E, Hanssen-Bauer I et al (2015) Surface air temperature. In: Jeffries MO, Richter-Menge J, Overland JE (eds) Arctic Report Card 2015, pp 10–16. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard. Accessed 23 Nov 2016
Pagano AM, Durner GM, Amstrup SC et al (2012) Long-distance swimming by polar bears (Ursus maritimus) of the southern Beaufort Sea during years of extensive open water. Can J Zool 90:663–676
Peacock E, Taylor MK, Laake J et al (2013) Population ecology of polar bears in Davis Strait, Canada and Greenland. J Wildl Manag 77:463–476
Regehr EV, Lunn NJ, Amstrup SC et al (2007) Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J Wildl Manag 71:2673–2683
Regehr EV, Hunter CM, Caswell H et al (2010) Survival and breeding of polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea in relation to sea ice. J Anim Ecol 79:117–127
Robbins CT, Lopez-Alfaro C, Rode KD et al (2012) Hibernation and seasonal fasting in bears: the energetic costs and consequences for polar bears. J Mammal 93:1493–1503
Rode KD, Amstrup SC, Regehr EV (2010) Reduced body size and cub recruitment in polar bears associated with sea ice decline. Ecol Appl 20:768–782
Rode KD, Regehr EV, Douglas DC et al (2014) Variation in the response of an Arctic top predator experiencing habitat loss: feeding and reproductive ecology of two polar bear populations. Glob Chang Biol 20:76–88
Rode KD, Robbins CT, Nelson L et al (2015a) Can polar bears use terrestrial foods to offset lost ice-based hunting opportunities? Front Ecol Environ 13:138–145
Rode KD, Wilson RR, Regehr EV et al (2015b) Increased land use by Chukchi Sea polar bears in relation to changing sea ice conditions. PLoS One 10:e0142213. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142213
Schneider S (2009) The worst-case scenario. Nature 458:1004–1005
Schofield O, Ducklow HW, Martinson DG et al (2010) How do polar marine ecosystems respond to rapid climate change? Science 328:1520–1523
Smith P, Davis SJ, Creutzig F et al (2015) Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 6:42–50
Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J (1999) Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52:294–306
Tollefson J (2015) Is the 2°C world a fantasy? Nature 527:436–438
Tremblay J-É, Anderson LG, Matrai P et al (2015) Global and regional drivers of nutrient supply, primary production and CO2 drawdown in the changing Arctic Ocean. Prog Oceanogr 139:171–196
United Nations (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement, draft. Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2016
van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douglas, D.C., Atwood, T.C. (2017). Uncertainties in Forecasting the Response of Polar Bears to Global Climate Change. In: Butterworth, A. (eds) Marine Mammal Welfare. Animal Welfare, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46994-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46994-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46993-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46994-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)