Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

International Policies and Regulatory Instruments for Non-financial Reporting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) often involves the development of network relations as both private and government actors invest in and draw upon social capital (Habisch & Moon, 2006). CSR necessitates legal compliance as well as ‘customary ethics’ (Carroll, 1991). In this context, it seems that a motivation for CSR may be borne out as a necessity to offset the threat of regulation. ‘Many companies prefer to be one step ahead of government legislation or intervention, to anticipate social pressures themselves’, (Moon & Richardson, 1985, p. 137 in Crane, Matten, & Spence, 2008, p. 308). Therefore, non-governmental organisations (NGOs ) sought to step into the regulatory vacuum created by the inadequacies of both national governments and international institutions to regulate multinational corporations (MNCs ) by forging alliances with consumers, institutional investors and companies themselves (Newell, 2000, pp. 117–118). While they cannot replace the role of the state, these social movements have created new mechanisms of global business regulation. According to Knill and Lehmkuhl (2002, p. 442); global corporate responsibility is intended to compensate for the decreasing capacities of national governments for providing public goods. CSR may have represented an effort to challenge the increasing reluctance of national governments to impose regulations on global firms that could have discouraged domestic investment. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to better understand how business and government may become more aligned with regards to the regulatory aspect of CSR. This contribution suggests that there is scope for governments to take an active leading role in triggering responsible behaviours among firms. The businesses themselves will realise that appropriate environmental, social and governance regulations can bring in economic value as well.

Parts of this chapter have appeared in Camilleri, M. A. (2015) Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting. Corporate Reputation Review. 18(3), 210–222.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agenda 21. (1992). United Nations Sustainable Development Conference, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 13 June. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

  • Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 347–363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00539.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wagner, M., & Tyteca, D. (2008). Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(2), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boll, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and welfare state institutions. Retrieved January 23, 2016, from http://www.sfi.dk/graphics/SFI/Strategisk%20forskningsudvalg/Konference%202007/Papers%202007/Paper%2020.%202007.%20Joachim%20Boll.%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20and%20Welfare%20State%20Institutions.pdf

  • Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved May 3, 2016, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/t31047531qr27346/fulltext.pdf

  • Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. A European perspective. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in global context (Vol. 1, pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2009). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBIS. (2013). Department for Business, Innovation and Skills—Corporate Responsibility: A Government Update. Retrieved Feburary 3, 2016, from http://bis.ecgroup.net/Publications/BusinessLaw/CorporateGovernance/041112.aspx

  • De Tomasi, D. A. (2006). International regimes: The case of Western Corporate Governance. International Studies Review, 8, pp. 225–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2007). National public policies in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Brussels: Enterprise Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved Feburary 3, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/_getdocument.cfm?doc_id=701

  • EU. (2012). Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and SMEs. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/sme/european-expert-group/index_en.htm

  • EU. (2014). Non-financial reporting. Retrieved June 5, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/non-financial_reporting/index_en.htm

  • EY. (2013). Ernst young: Corporate Social Responsibility in India potential to contribute towards inclusive social development Global CSR Summit 2013. An Agenda for Inclusive Growth. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Government-and-Public-Sector-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India/$File/EY-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India.pdf

  • Fair Trade Foundation. (2012, May 4). What is Fair Trade? http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/what_is_fairtrade/default.aspx

  • Fukukawa, K., & Moon, J. (2004). A Japanese model of corporate social responsibility? A study of website reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 16, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability—The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W. J., Nielsen, A. E., Thomsen, C., & Schultz, F. (2013). CSR communication: Quo vadis? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., & Jeremy Moon, J. (2006). Social capital and corporate social responsibility. The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2001). Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at corporate social accounting, auditing, and reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IB. (2014, April 1–7). Indian Business: Weekly Economic Bulletin. ITP, Division Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://indiainbusiness.nic.in/newdesign/upload/Publications/Weekly/April/ITP-Weekly-Economic-Bulletin-1st_April_07_April_2014.pdf

  • India Companies Act. (2013). Insight series—Volume IV corporate social responsibility. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/taxnewsflash/Documents/india-sept20-2013no4companies.pdf

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesover, F., & Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to Non-OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærgaard, A., & Morsing, M. (2012). A case study of how social media guidelines are used to discipline employee behaviour (pp. 5–7). Helsinki: European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2013). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. (2001). SA 8000: The definitive guide to the new social standard. London: FT Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. (2003). The corporate responsibility code book. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, X. (1996). Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional (Papers de Formació 23 Diputació de Barcelona).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government. Realigning business, government and civil society. Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (neo) liberal and welfare state models. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Richardson, J. J. (1985). Unemployment in the UK: Politics and policies. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Sochacki, R. (1996). The social responsibility of business in job and enterprise creation: Motives. Means and Implications. Australian Quarterly, 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M., Dos Santos, V., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2000). Oceans apart? Comparing business responses to the environment in Europe and North America. Environment, 42(9), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2002). From responsibility to citizenship: Corporate accountability for development. IDS Bulletin, 33(2) Making rights real: Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. Brighton: IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2007). Reporting CSR—What and how to say it? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Basic principles of corporate governance. Organisation for Economic Cooperation And Development, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html

  • Rasche, A. (2007). The paradoxical foundation of strategic management. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards—The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2010). Collaborative governance 2.0. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability—Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., Baur, D., Van Huijstee, M., Ladek, S., & Naidu, J. (2008). Corporations as political actors—A report on the first Swiss Master Class in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., Power, D., & Klassen, R. (2012). When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards. Retrieved May 3, 2016, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/gn4kg415544l2516/fulltext.pdf

  • Stenzel, P. L. (2000). Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation? American Business Law Journal, 37(2), 237–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Corporate Communication, University of Malta, Msida, Malta

    Mark Anthony Camilleri

Authors
  1. Mark Anthony Camilleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Camilleri, M.A. (2017). International Policies and Regulatory Instruments for Non-financial Reporting. In: Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46849-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation