Skip to main content

Drilling Grid Analysis for Defining Open-Pit and Underground Mineral Resource Classification through Production Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geostatistics Valencia 2016

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 19))

  • 1713 Accesses

Abstract

The varied types of mineral deposits and geological features around the world have led to the creation of a large number of techniques, methodologies, and definitions for mineral resource classification. The most common methods used in the mineral industry include kriging variance, drilling spacing, neighborhood restriction, and conditional simulations. These methods generally do not use reconciled production information, only long-term borehole information based on personal judgment for defining confident intervals/limits on the mineral resource classification. A drilling spacing back analysis study for defining mineral resource classification was completed considering tonnages and grades confidence intervals related to its respective production volumes, based on short-term production reconciliation of analog deposits. The definition of adequate drill holes spacing and detailed results for classifying mineral resources are demonstrated by both an open-pit and an underground project adjacent to an existing mining operation. This study has considered a Brazilian sulfide deposit (Cu-Au) operating mine as analog information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Burmeister B (1988) From resource to reality: a critical review of the achievements of new Australian gold mining projects during 1983–1987. Macquarie University, Sidney

    Google Scholar 

  • Deraisme J, Roth C (2000) The information effect and estimating recoverable reserves. Geovariances

    Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich C, Reuwsaat JD, Menin R, Paula WF (2016) Selection of operational mining unit (OMU) size, Proceedings GEOSTATS 2016. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Godoy M, Chou C (2009) Resource/reserve classification with integrated geometric and local grade variability measures. In: Proceedings orebody modelling and strategic mine planning. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp 207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Harquail D (1991) Investing in junior mining companies. 6th Mineral Economics Symposium of CIM. Canadian Institute of Mining, Mettalurgy and Petroleum, Montreal, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks E (2004, 2005) The kriging oxymoron: a conditionally unbiased and accurate predictor. In: Proceedings of geostatistics banff, 2nd edn. Springer, Banff, pp 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara RM, Couble A, Emery X, Varela EM, Ortiz JM (2006) Block size selection and its impact on open-pit design and mine planning. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 106:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuangthong O, Neufeld C, Deutsch CV (2003) Optimal selection of selective mining unit (SMU) size. University of Alberta, Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley C (2003). Beyond reconciliation: a proactive approach to using mining data. In: Large open pit mining conference. Kalgoorlie, pp 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva DA (2013) Mineral resource classification (NI 43–101): an overview and a new evaluation technque. In: Centre for computational geostatistics. University of Alberta, Edmonton, p 307

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair A, Blackwell G (2002) Applied mineral inventory estimation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson P (1998) The JORC code, 1987–1997, in Geology of Australian and Papua New Guinean Mineral Deposits. In: Australasian institute of mining and metallurgy. Melbourne, pp 44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée MA (1992) The guide to the evaluation of gold deposits: integrating deposit evaluation and reserve inventory practices. CIM Bull 85:50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Verly G, Postolski T, Parker H (2014) Assessing uncertainty with drill hole spacing studies – applications to mineral resources. In: Proceedings orebody modelling and strategic mine planning symposium. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Perth, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wober HA (1993) Classification of ore reserves based on geostatistical and economic parameters. CIM Bull 86:73–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Menin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menin, R., Diedrich, C., Reuwsaat, J.D., De Paula, W.F. (2017). Drilling Grid Analysis for Defining Open-Pit and Underground Mineral Resource Classification through Production Data. In: Gómez-Hernández, J., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., Rodrigo-Clavero, M., Cassiraga, E., Vargas-Guzmán, J. (eds) Geostatistics Valencia 2016. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics