Skip to main content

Improving Strategy for Discovering Interacting Genetic Variants in Association Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9947))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Revealing the underlying complex architecture of human diseases has received considerable attention since the exploration of genotype-phenotype relationships in genetic epidemiology. Identification of these relationships becomes more challenging due to multiple factors acting together or independently. A deep neural network was trained in the previous work to identify two-locus interacting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to a complex disease. The model was assessed for all two-locus combinations under various simulated scenarios. The results showed significant improvements in predicting SNP-SNP interactions over the existing conventional machine learning techniques. Furthermore, the findings are confirmed on a published dataset. However, the performance of the proposed method in the higher-order interactions was unknown. The objective of this study is to validate the model for the higher-order interactions in high-dimensional data. The proposed method is further extended for unsupervised learning. A number of experiments were performed on the simulated datasets under same scenarios as well as a real dataset to show the performance of the extended model. On an average, the results illustrate improved performance over the previous methods. The model is further evaluated on a sporadic breast cancer dataset to identify higher-order interactions between SNPs. The results rank top 20 higher-order SNP interactions responsible for sporadic breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cordell, H.J.: Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10(6), 392–404 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Steen, K.: Travelling the world of gene–gene interactions. Briefings Bioinform. 13(1), 1–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Upstill-Goddard, R., et al.: Machine learning approaches for the discovery of gene–gene interactions in disease data. Briefings Bioinform. 14(2), 251–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, C.C., et al.: Methods for identifying SNP interactions: a review on variations of Logic regression, random forest and Bayesian logistic regression. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 8(6), 1580–1591 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Purcell, S., et al.: PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81(3), 559–575 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwender, H., Ickstadt, K.: Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Biostatistics 9(1), 187–198 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Park, M.Y., Hastie, T.: Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions. Biostatistics 9(1), 30–50 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Niel, C., et al.: A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection. Front. Genet. 6, 285 (2015). doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchie, M.D., et al.: Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69(1), 138–147 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson, M., et al.: A combinatorial partitioning method to identify multilocus genotypic partitions that predict quantitative trait variation. Genome Res. 11(3), 458–470 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Culverhouse, R., Klein, T., Shannon, W.: Detecting epistatic interactions contributing to quantitative traits. Genetic Epidemiol. 27(2), 141–152 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Q., et al.: SNP selection and classification of genome-wide SNP data using stratified sampling random forests. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 11(3), 216–227 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, R., et al.: A random forest approach to the detection of epistatic interactions in case-control studies. BMC Bioinform. 10(Suppl. 1), S65 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwarz, D.F., König, I.R., Ziegler, A.: On safari to random jungle: a fast implementation of random forests for high-dimensional data. Bioinformatics 26(14), 1752–1758 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida, M., Koike, A.: SNPInterForest: a new method for detecting epistatic interactions. BMC Bioinform. 12(1), 469 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Y., Liu, J.S.: Bayesian inference of epistatic interactions in case-control studies. Nat. Genet. 39(9), 1167–1173 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Han, B., Chen, X.-W.: bNEAT: a Bayesian network method for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies. BMC Genom. 12(Suppl. 2), S9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Padyukov, L.: Between the Lines of Genetic Code: Genetic Interactions in Understanding Disease and Complex Phenotypes. Academic Press, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Min, S., Lee, B., Yoon, S.: Deep learning in bioinformatics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06430 (2016)

  21. Uppu, S., Krishna, A., and Gopalan, P.R., Towards deep learning in genome-wide association interaction studies. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information System, Taiwan (2016). ISBN 9789860491029

    Google Scholar 

  22. Uppu, S., Krishna, A., Gopalan, P.R.: A deep learning appraoch to detect SNP interactions. J. Softw. (accepted), Will be published in vol. 11, no. 10, October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bengio, Y., I.J. Goodfellow, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. An MIT Press electronic book, version 10–18 (2015). http://www.deeplearningbook.org/

  24. Candel, A., et al.: Deep Learning with H2O (2016). http://h2o.ai/resources/

  25. Recht, B., et al.: Hogwild: a lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uppu, S., Krishna, A., Gopalan, P.R.: Detecting SNP interactions in balanced and imbalanced datasets using associative classification. Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst. 14(1), 7–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jolliffe, I.: Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Online Library (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suneetha Uppu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Uppu, S., Krishna, A. (2016). Improving Strategy for Discovering Interacting Genetic Variants in Association Studies. In: Hirose, A., Ozawa, S., Doya, K., Ikeda, K., Lee, M., Liu, D. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46687-3_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46687-3_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46686-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46687-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics