Skip to main content

Artificial Neural Networks Modeling of a Karstic Watershed in Mount Lebanon

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EuroKarst 2016, Neuchâtel

Part of the book series: Advances in Karst Science ((AKS))

  • 811 Accesses

Abstract

When applied to hydrology, the artificial neural networks (ANN) offer multiple advantages over conventional rainfall–runoff models. It was very interesting to assess the ANN performance over one of Mount Lebanon watersheds characterized by their nonlinear hydrologic regime due to the karstic nature, geomorphology and heterogeneous precipitation of rain and snow. The time delay neural network (TDNN) models in this study were assessed for their ability to simulate highly karstified watershed with little precipitation data, especially concerning snow contribution and for their ability to simulate fluctuated river flows. The selected watershed for this study was Nahr Ibrahim watershed with an area of 329 km2 and an upper part located above 1700 m altitude taking part of the Cenomanian Plateau of Mount Lebanon. This karstic plateau is a stage for snow accumulation during winter and snowmelt during spring. The snowmelt is discharged by underneath karstic springs of Afqa and Roueiss, main contributors to Nahr Ibrahim flow. To achieve a better comprehension of the hydrologic regime, annual simulations with daily time step were conducted in this study. A simple snowmelt model was coupled with TDNN model (A) to makeup the lack of snow data. Model (A) which registered a considerable performance Nash criteria reaching 0.73 for the karstic springs and 0.66 for the watershed. However, two other methods were applied: the first, model (B), using BFImax separation method which yielded a high performance of 0.95 and the second, model (C) with spring flows as input data which yielded 0.87. In this study, only nonlinear input output neural network was applied to avoid autoregressive models which would have definitely returned higher performances due to the long term rainfall–runoff correlation of the springs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aouad-Rizk, A., Job, J., Khalil, S., Touma, T., Bitar, C., Bocquillon, C., & Najem, W. (2005). Snow in Lebanon: a preliminary study of snowcover over Mount Lebanon and a simple snowmelt model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50(3), 555-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • COE. (1956). Snow hydrology. Portland, OR: United States Army, Corps of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, G. et al. (2002). Réseaux de neurones: Méthodologie et applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, K. (2005). How to Construct Recursive Digital Filters for Baseflow Separation. Hydrological Processes, 507-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K. (1991). Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feedforward Networks. Neural Networks, 251-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hreiche, A. (2003). Modelisation Conceptuelle de la transformationpluie-debit dans le contexte mediterranéen. Montpellier: University of Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hreiche, A., & Najem, W. (2007). Hydrological impact simulations of climate change on Lebanese Coastal Rivers. Hydrological Sceinces Journal, 1119-1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGH. (2012). International Glossary of Hydrology. WMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, M. S., & Rhinehart, R. R. (1999). A Method to Determine the Required Number of Neural-Network Training Repetitions. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 427-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannet, A. (1994). Subterranean Water Infiltration Modelling by Neural Networks :. ICANN. Sorrento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong A Siou, L., Johannet, A., Borrell, V., & Pistre, S. (2011). Complexity selection of a neural network model for karst flood forecasting: The case of the Lez Basin (southern France). Volume 406,(Issues 1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J., & Sutcliffe, J. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I. Journal of Hydrology, 282-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waibel, A., Toshiyuki, H., & Geoffrey, H. (1989). Phoeneme Recognition Using Time-Delay Neural Network. 37(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, Y. (1997). Time Delay Neural Networks for the Classification of Flow Regimes. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurada, J. M. (1992). Introduction to artificial neural systems application of neural network to rainfall runoff modeling. New York: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuzel, J., & Cox, L. (1975). Relative importance of meteorological variables in snowmelt. Water Resources Research, 11(1):174-176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Allam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Allam, A., Najem, W. (2017). Artificial Neural Networks Modeling of a Karstic Watershed in Mount Lebanon. In: Renard, P., Bertrand, C. (eds) EuroKarst 2016, Neuchâtel. Advances in Karst Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45465-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics