Abstract
Education research on learning progressions (LPs) has had a significant emergence in China. At present, researchers in science education have started to make use of the learning progressions research model for developing research tools and collecting data of progressions of student learning in K-12 grade levels. However, there have not been any empirical research studies on the LPs for secondary geography education in high schools. Aiming to solve or at least improve numerous challenges in the present geography education system, Chinese curriculum standards for secondary geography are being revised. The process of current curriculum reform shares some key points with LPs research. The method of learning progressions is a good approach to strengthen student learning within geography curriculum reform in China. However, it is also important to be aware of the challenges confronted in the process of conducting research on LPs for geography education in secondary schools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai, Y., & Zeng, S. (2015). Research on geography education popularization under the view of HPS education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, (20) 111–112.
Chen, X. (2012). Research on children’s learning progression for chemical reaction. Shanghai: East China Normal University.
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform (pp. 11–13). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182.
Gao, Y. (2014). The Interpretation of ministry of education officials: push forward the work of morality Education. http://www.jyb.cn/china/gnxw/201404/t20140425_579413.html. Accessed 4 April 2015.
Gao, F., & Chen, Z. (2011). Learning progressions: New approaches to American science education reform. Studies in Foreign Education, 2011(05), 87–90.
Geography Curriculum Standards Revision Group for Ordinary High Schools in China. (2015). Draft of High School Geography Curriculum Standards in China.
Gu, Z., & Zhu, W. (2015). Exploring the development of learning processes from the perspective of teacher’s teaching practice. Research in Educational Development, 10, 71–76.
Gunckel, K. L., Mohan, L., Covitt, B., & Anderson, C. (2012). Addressing challenges in developing learning progressions for environmental science literacy. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 39–75). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Guo, F. (2015). Educational values of geography in middle school. Shanghai: East China Normal University.
Huynh, N. T., Solem, M., & Bednarz, S. W. (2015). A road map for learning progressions research in geography. Journal of Geography, 114(2), 69–79.
Li, J. (2015). Core literacy is the road to deepen geography curriculum reform. Geography Education, 04, 4–6.
Li, Y. (2016). Enlightenment of learning progressions to geography education research in China. Primary and Secondary Schooling Abroad, 04, 24–29.
Liu, H. (2014). The research of the curriculum focal points of geography for high school. Changchun: Northeast Normal University.
Liu, S., & Liu, E. (2012). Learning progressions: Focus on students’ cognitive development and prior experiences. Journal of Educational Studies, 02, 81–87.
MOE/PRC. (2014). View on Deepening Curriculum Reform Comprehensively and Implementing the Fundamental Task of Morality Education. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7054/201404/xxgk_167226.html, Accessed April 8, 2014.
Mosher, F. A. (2011). The Role of Learning Progressions in Standards-Based Education Reform. CPRE Policy Briefs. RB-52. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Niu, C., & Liu, Y. (2015). Analysis on the connotation and characteristics of geographic key competences, and its development strategy. Journal of Tianjing Normal University (Elementary Education Edition), 04, 48–51.
Qiao, T. (2015). A study on the content of important ideas and learning progressions in motion and interaction. Chongqing: Southwest University.
Shen, J., & Wang, Z. (2014). Learning progressions towards teaching practice: A review on the western empirical researches. Studies in Foreign Education, 05, 107–114.
Si, H. (2013). A review on the researching methods of learning progressions. Studies in Foreign Education, 11, 21–28.
Solem, M. N., Huynh, N. T., & Boehm, R. G. (2015). Learning progressions for maps, geospatial technology, and spatial thinking: A research handbook. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Sun, Y., & Bi, H. (2015). A review of the development models of learning progressions in science education: A ChemQuery assessment system perspective. Global Education, 08, 104–113.
Taber, K. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education. Berlin: Springer.
Tang, G. (2015). Definition and composition of geographic core literacy. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 19, 4–6.
Wang, W. (2014). Research on core ideas of force and their learning progressions in Chinese high-school physics. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University.
Wang, L., & Huang, M. (2014). Emerging field of research in science education: Learning progressions. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 01, 112–118.
Wang, X., & Gao, Y. (2015). Restructuring of concept system and rethinking of teaching origin based on geography viewpoint in middle schools. Curriculum, Teaching Materials and Method, 5, 93–98+127.
Wei, S. (2010). Using Rasch modeling to develop computer modeling-based instruments for measuring middle school students’ conceptual understanding of structure of matter. Shanghai: East China Normal University.
Wei, X. (2014). The learning progressions research of energy in secondary school physics. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Wu, D. (2011). How to construct and cultivate geographic core literacy. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 19, 6–10.
Xu, N. (2009). Research on physics conceptual teaching in high school based on cognitive model change. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Yao, Y., & Guo, Y. (2014). Model building for students’ cognitive development: A review of ten-year research on learning progressions. Journal of Educational Studies, 05, 35–42.
Yuan, X., & Lou, X. (1999). Several main problems of the middle school geography education in China. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 10, 6–8.
Zhang, J. (2014). The research of modeling teaching based on the students’ mental learning progressions model: Using Electrostatics of Physics in University. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Zhang, J. (2015a). Discussion on geographic core literacy system. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 09, 4–7.
Zhang, S. (2015b). Connection of junior and senior high school geography on the basis of core concept and learning progressions analysis. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 15, 19–21.
Zhou, W., Dai, X., Duan, Y., & Lu, X. (2015). Statistics and analysis of the situation of published articles of teaching and learning of secondary history and geography from 2009 to 2013. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Education Science), 4(72), 77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duan, Y. et al. (2017). China. In: Muñiz Solari, O., Solem, M., Boehm, R. (eds) Learning Progressions in Geography Education. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44717-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44717-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44716-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44717-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)