Skip to main content

CO2 and Low-O2 Incubators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Vitro Fertilization
  • 2073 Accesses

Abstract

Embryo incubators can be considered the heart of any in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of our incubators is invaluable and essential to optimize clinical IVF outcomes. Based on the evidence, we should culture in a reduced-O2 environment if possible and, therefore, give preference to incubators that have the ability to provide a reduced-O2 environment. Second- and third-generation top-load mini-incubators are becoming a significant alternative to conventional incubators, mainly due to the considerably smaller footprint, lower cost of operation, and superior temperature and gas-phase recovery times. However, we should be aware of the unique safety and quality control challenges posed by top-load incubators. When using conventional incubators, those equipped with infrared CO2 sensors are superior. When having to use incubators with thermoconductivity CO2 sensors, humidity control is essential and clinical outcomes can be improved by limiting the number of patients per incubator and the number of incubator door openings. The quality of incubator supply gases should be considered as important as the general laboratory air quality and filtered similarly for particles and gaseous contaminants. Compressed N2 as a source to lower O2 concentration in the incubator should be avoided. Small direct-heat air-jacketed incubators are preferred over large water-jacketed incubators. Critical incubator performance parameters should be monitored daily with independent measuring devices. There should be no less than two incubators in any facility, regardless of type of incubator or the patient volume. Incubators must be connected to a 24-h alarm and notification system, monitoring all critical incubator parameters. Knowing that more than one sound approach to IVF can yield excellent results, the goal is not to recommend specific products or solutions but rather to suggest principles and general guidelines useful to everyday decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yedwab GA, Paz G, Homonnai TZ, David MP, Kraicer PF. Temperature, pH and partial pressure of oxygen in the cervix and uterus of women and uterus of rats during the cycle. Fertil Steril. 1976;27:304–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Byatt-Smith JG, Leese HJ, Gosden RG. An investigation by mathematical modeling of whether mouse and human preimplantation embryos in static culture can satisfy their demands for oxygen by diffusion. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:52–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Bavister BD. Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;99:673–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harlow GM, Quinn P. Foetal and placental growth in the mouse after pre-implantation development in vitro under oxygen concentrations of 5% and 20%. Aust J Biol Sci. 1979;32:363–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Batt PA, Gardner DK, Cameron AW. Oxygen concentration and protein source affect the development of preimplantation goat embryos in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1991;3:601–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan YQ, Van Soom A, Coopman FOJ, Mintiens K, Boerjan ML, Van Zeveren A, de Kruif A, Peelman LJ. Influence of oxygen tension on apoptosis and hatching in bovine embryos cultured in vitro. Theriogenology. 2003;59:1585–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karja NW, Wongsrikeao P, Murakami M, Agung B, Fahrudin M, Nagai T, Otoi T. Effects of oxygen tension on the development and quality of porcine in vitro fertilized embryos. Theriogenology. 2004;62:1585–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leoni GG, Rosati I, Succo S, Bogliolo L, Bebbere D, Berlinguer F, Ledda S, Naitana S. A low oxygen atmosphere during IVF accelerates the kinetic of formation of in vitro produced ovine blastocysts. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007;42:299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumoulin JCM, Vanvuchelen RCM, Land JA, Pieters MHEC, Geraedts JPM, Evers JLH. Effect of oxygen concentration on in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in the human and the mouse. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:115–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumoulin JCM, Meijers CJJ, Bras M, Coonen E, Geraedts JPM, Evers JLH. Effect of oxygen concentration on human in vitro fertilization and embryo culture. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:465–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kea B, Gebhardt J, Watt J, Westphal LM, Lathi RB, Milki AA, Behr B. Effect of reduced oxygen concentrations on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:213–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waldenström U, Engström A, Hellberg D, Nilsson S. Low-oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2461–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meintjes M, Chantilis S, Douglas J, Rodriguez A, Guerami A, Bookout D, Barnett B, Madden J. A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:300–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pabon JE, Findley WE, Gibbons WE. The toxic effects of short exposures to the atmospheric oxygen concentration on early mouse embryonic development. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:896–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karagenc L, Ciray N, Ulug U, Bahçeci M. Impact of oxygen concentration on embryonic development of mouse zygotes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9:409–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harvey AJ, Kind KL, Pantaleon M, Armstrong DT, Thompson JG. Oxygen regulated gene expression in bovine blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1108–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meintjes M, Chantilis S, Guerami A, Douglas J, Rodriguez A, Madden J. Normalization of the live-birth sex ratio after blastocyst transfer from improved culture conditions. Fertil Steril. 2009;82(Suppl 2):S35.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catt J, Henman MJ. Toxic effects of O2 on human embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooke S, Tyler JPP, Driscoll G. Objective assessments of temperature maintenance using in vitro culture techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:368–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiwara M, Takahashi K, Izuno M, Duan YR, Kazono M, Kimura F, Noda Y. Effect of micro-environment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization: comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang JQ, Li XL, Peng Y, Guo X, Heng BC, Tong GQ. Reduction of exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(4):510–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Higdon HL, Blackhurst DW, Boone WR. Incubator management in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:703–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooke S, Quinn P, Kime L, Ayre C, Tyler JPP, Driscoll GL. Improvement in early human embryo development using new formation sequential stage-specific culture media. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1254–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen J, Gilligan A, Esposito W, Schimmel W, Dale T. Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1742–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Merton JS, Vermeulen ZL, Otter T, Mullaart T, de Ruigh L, Hasler JF. Carbon-activated gas filtration during in vitro culture increased pregnancy rate following transfer of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2007;67:1233–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Meintjes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Questions

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Please describe the different types of incubators available.

  2. 2.

    Please define what the major functions of the incubators in the embryology laboratory are.

  3. 3.

    Please explain why low-O2 concentration incubators are recommended for embryo culture.

  4. 4.

    Please describe how to perform quality control correctly on the incubators.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meintjes, M. (2019). CO2 and Low-O2 Incubators. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43010-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43011-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics