Skip to main content

Potential Defense From Herbivory by Dazzle Effects and Trickery Coloration of Variegated Leaves

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defensive (anti-herbivory) Coloration in Land Plants
  • 1047 Accesses

Abstract

Two types of defensive coloration theoretically and practically related to and even quite overlapping with masquerade are various types of military dazzle and trickery coloration. Dazzle and trickery coloration were developed and applied to defend navies when the range of artillery and torpedoes increased to several kilometers, and when aiming by visual means ruled naval warfare. The very conspicuous dazzle coloration invented for naval defense during World War I was used in pre-radar days to mislead attackers of naval units concerning vessel size, type, speed and direction. This is why I consider them to be related to or even to be a branch/type of masquerade. In spite of the large scale use of dazzle and trickery coloration during World Wars I and II (Wilkinson 1969; Stanley 1998; Williams 2001; Forbes 2009), and the apparent visual parallels of these patterns of coloration in animals and plants, very little attention has been given to these potential types of defense in biology in general, and concerning plants in particular. Defensive dazzle plant coloration received for some years only very brief and limited attention, without discussing the theoretical aspects (Lev-Yadun 2003a, 2006a, 2009a) and only recently (Lev-Yadun 2014c) the theoretical and botanical aspects were discussed in some depth. The definition of dazzle coloration in the scientific literature was also partly misleading because of the common confusion of dazzle coloration with crypsis via disruptive coloration (see Forbes 2009). In both the military and nature, the borders between these two types of defensive coloration are indeed not always clear, especially since certain color patterns may serve as camouflage when distant and for dazzling or trickery at a closer range or under different lighted conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amador-Vargas S, Dominguez M, León G, Maldonado B, Murillo J, Vides GL (2014) Leaf-folding response of a sensitive plant shows context-dependent behavioral plasticity. Plant Ecol 215:1445–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady J, Shereni W (1988) Landing responses of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Glossinidae & Muscidae) to black-and-white patterns: a laboratory study. Bull Entomol Res 78:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1999) Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res 1:49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Lawton JH (1991) Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 333:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Osorio D (2007) Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry? PLoS Biol 5:e339

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford-Sidebotham TJ (1972) The role of slugs and snails in the maintenance of the cyanogenesis polymorphisms of Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens. Heredity 28:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R, Harper JL (1982) Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions IV. The performance of cyanogenic and acyanogenic morphs of Trifolium repens in the field. J Ecol 70:119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson C, Frymire G (1961) Natural pollination of orchids. Mo Bot Gard Bull 49:133–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Doku C, Brady J (1989) Landing site preferences of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the laboratory: avoidance of horizontal features? Bull Entomol Res 79:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals. A survey of anti-predator defences. Longman Group Ltd., Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri Á, Blahó M, Kriska G, Farkas R, Gyurkovszky M, Åkesson S, Horváth G (2012) Polarotactic tabanids find striped patterns with brightness and/or polarization modulation least attractive: an advantage of zebra stripes. J Exp Biol 215:736–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T (1981) Leaf folding in a sensitive plant: a defensive thorn-exposure mechanism? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:402–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes P (2009) Dazzled and deceived: mimicry and camouflage. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson G (1992) Do tsetse flies ‘see’ zebras? A field study of the visual response of tsetse to striped targets. Physiol Entomol 17:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey-Wilson C (1988) The genus Cyclamen. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in association with Christopher Helm and Timber Press, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen L, Valkonen J, Mappes J, Rojas B (2015) Visual illusions in predator-prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch. Anim Cogn 18:1059–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hornell J (1941) Fishing-poisons. Man 41:126–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AE, Troscianko J, Stevens M (2014) Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success. BMC Evol Biol 14:201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AE, Magor-Elliott RS, Stevens M (2015) The role of stripe orientation in target capture success. Front Zool 12:17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Burns JM (2010) A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11659–11665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen EL, Dill LM, Cahill JF Jr (2011) Applying behavioral-ecological theory to plant defense: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward. Am Nat 177:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J (1984) The zebra’s stripes: an aid to group cohesion. In: MacDonald D (ed) The encyclopedia of mammals. Equinox, Oxford, pp 486–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1972) The spotted hyena. A study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2003a) Why do some thorny plants resemble green zebras? J Theor Biol 244:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2006a) Defensive coloration in plants: a review of current ideas about anti-herbivore coloration strategies. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and topical issues, vol IV. Global Science Books, London, pp 292–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2009a) Aposematic (warning) coloration in plants. In: Baluska F (ed) Plant-environment interactions. From sensory plant biology to active plant behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 167–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2009b) Müllerian and Batesian mimicry rings of white-variegated aposematic spiny and thorny plants: a hypothesis. Isr J Plant Sci 57:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2009d) Ant mimicry by Passiflora flowers? Isr J Entomol 39:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2013b) The enigmatic fast leaflet rotation in Desmodium motorium: butterfly mimicry for defense? Plant Signal Behav 8:e24473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2014a) The proposed anti-herbivory roles of white leaf variegation. Prog Bot 76:241–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2014c) Potential defence from herbivory by dazzle effects and trickery coloration of leaf variegation. Biol J Linn Soc 111:692–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S, Inbar M (2002) Defensive ant, aphid and caterpillar mimicry in plants. Biol J Linn Soc 77:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S, Ne’eman G (2012) Does bee or wasp mimicry by orchid flowers also deter herbivores? Arthropod Plant Interact 6:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (1990) Animal watching. A field guide to animal behaviour. Jonathan Cape, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersesian CL, Banks PB, McArthur C (2011) Titrating the cost of plant toxins against predators: determining the tipping point for foraging herbivores. J Anim Ecol 80:753–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:337–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser B (2003) Jungle bugs: masters of camouflage and mimicry. Firefly Books, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves JL (2011) Vision should not be overlooked as an important sensory modality for finding host plants. Environ Entomol 40:855–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reznicek G, Jurenitsch J, Robien W, Kubelka W (1989) Saponins in Cyclamen species: configuration of cyclamiretin C and structure of isocyclamin. Phytochem 28:825–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2004) Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? Bioscience 54:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RK (1980) The lycaened “false head” hypothesis: historical review and quantitative analysis. J Lepidopteran Soc 34:194–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RK (1981) The ‘false head’ hypothesis: predation and wing pattern variation of lycaenid butterflies. Am Nat 118:770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD (2002) The possible fitness benefits of striped coat coloration for zebra. Mammal Rev 32:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack. The evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals & mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santer RD (2013) Motion dazzle: a locust’s eye view. Biol Lett 9:20130811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R, Palmer CE, Cuthill IC (2011) Dazzle camouflage affects speed perception. PLoS One 6:e20233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley RM II (1998) To fool a glass eye. Camouflage versus photoreconnaissance in World War II. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M (2007) Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc R Soc B 274:1457–1464

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD (2008a) Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proc R Soc B 275:2639–2643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M, Searle WTL, Seymour JE, Marshall KLA, Ruxton GD (2011) Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses. BMC Biol 9:81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • von Helversen B, Schooler LJ, Czienskowski U (2013) Are stripes beneficial? Dazzle camouflage influences perceived speed and hit rates. PLoS One 8:e61173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1981) How the zebra got its stripes – biting flies as selective agents in the evolution of zebra coloration. J Ent Soc Sth Afr 44:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren J (2015) Is wind-mediated passive leaf movement an effective form of herbivore defence? Plant Ecol Evol 148:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren J, James P (2008) Do flowers wave to attract pollinators? A case study with Silene maritima. J Evol Biol 21:1024–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W (1968) Mimicry in plants and animals. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens D (1978) Mimicry in plants. Evol Biol 11:365–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson N (1969) A brush with life. Seeley Service & Co Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D (2001) Naval camouflage 1914–1945. A complete visual reference. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K (2011) Gone with the wind: trembling leaves may deter herbivory. Biol J Linn Soc 104:738–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lev-Yadun, S. (2016). Potential Defense From Herbivory by Dazzle Effects and Trickery Coloration of Variegated Leaves. In: Defensive (anti-herbivory) Coloration in Land Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42096-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics