Abstract
Two types of defensive coloration theoretically and practically related to and even quite overlapping with masquerade are various types of military dazzle and trickery coloration. Dazzle and trickery coloration were developed and applied to defend navies when the range of artillery and torpedoes increased to several kilometers, and when aiming by visual means ruled naval warfare. The very conspicuous dazzle coloration invented for naval defense during World War I was used in pre-radar days to mislead attackers of naval units concerning vessel size, type, speed and direction. This is why I consider them to be related to or even to be a branch/type of masquerade. In spite of the large scale use of dazzle and trickery coloration during World Wars I and II (Wilkinson 1969; Stanley 1998; Williams 2001; Forbes 2009), and the apparent visual parallels of these patterns of coloration in animals and plants, very little attention has been given to these potential types of defense in biology in general, and concerning plants in particular. Defensive dazzle plant coloration received for some years only very brief and limited attention, without discussing the theoretical aspects (Lev-Yadun 2003a, 2006a, 2009a) and only recently (Lev-Yadun 2014c) the theoretical and botanical aspects were discussed in some depth. The definition of dazzle coloration in the scientific literature was also partly misleading because of the common confusion of dazzle coloration with crypsis via disruptive coloration (see Forbes 2009). In both the military and nature, the borders between these two types of defensive coloration are indeed not always clear, especially since certain color patterns may serve as camouflage when distant and for dazzling or trickery at a closer range or under different lighted conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amador-Vargas S, Dominguez M, León G, Maldonado B, Murillo J, Vides GL (2014) Leaf-folding response of a sensitive plant shows context-dependent behavioral plasticity. Plant Ecol 215:1445–1454
Brady J, Shereni W (1988) Landing responses of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Glossinidae & Muscidae) to black-and-white patterns: a laboratory study. Bull Entomol Res 78:301–311
Brown JS (1999) Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res 1:49–71
Brown VK, Lawton JH (1991) Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 333:265–272
Chittka L, Osorio D (2007) Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry? PLoS Biol 5:e339
Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London
Crawford-Sidebotham TJ (1972) The role of slugs and snails in the maintenance of the cyanogenesis polymorphisms of Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens. Heredity 28:405–411
Dirzo R, Harper JL (1982) Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions IV. The performance of cyanogenic and acyanogenic morphs of Trifolium repens in the field. J Ecol 70:119–138
Dodson C, Frymire G (1961) Natural pollination of orchids. Mo Bot Gard Bull 49:133–152
Doku C, Brady J (1989) Landing site preferences of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the laboratory: avoidance of horizontal features? Bull Entomol Res 79:521–528
Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals. A survey of anti-predator defences. Longman Group Ltd., Harlow
Egri Á, Blahó M, Kriska G, Farkas R, Gyurkovszky M, Åkesson S, Horváth G (2012) Polarotactic tabanids find striped patterns with brightness and/or polarization modulation least attractive: an advantage of zebra stripes. J Exp Biol 215:736–745
Eisner T (1981) Leaf folding in a sensitive plant: a defensive thorn-exposure mechanism? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:402–404
Forbes P (2009) Dazzled and deceived: mimicry and camouflage. Yale University Press, New Haven
Gibson G (1992) Do tsetse flies ‘see’ zebras? A field study of the visual response of tsetse to striped targets. Physiol Entomol 17:141–147
Grey-Wilson C (1988) The genus Cyclamen. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in association with Christopher Helm and Timber Press, Kew
Hämäläinen L, Valkonen J, Mappes J, Rojas B (2015) Visual illusions in predator-prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch. Anim Cogn 18:1059–1068
Hornell J (1941) Fishing-poisons. Man 41:126–128
Hughes AE, Troscianko J, Stevens M (2014) Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success. BMC Evol Biol 14:201
Hughes AE, Magor-Elliott RS, Stevens M (2015) The role of stripe orientation in target capture success. Front Zool 12:17
Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Burns JM (2010) A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11659–11665
Jensen EL, Dill LM, Cahill JF Jr (2011) Applying behavioral-ecological theory to plant defense: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward. Am Nat 177:377–381
Kingdon J (1984) The zebra’s stripes: an aid to group cohesion. In: MacDonald D (ed) The encyclopedia of mammals. Equinox, Oxford, pp 486–487
Kruuk H (1972) The spotted hyena. A study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lev-Yadun S (2003a) Why do some thorny plants resemble green zebras? J Theor Biol 244:483–489
Lev-Yadun S (2006a) Defensive coloration in plants: a review of current ideas about anti-herbivore coloration strategies. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and topical issues, vol IV. Global Science Books, London, pp 292–299
Lev-Yadun S (2009a) Aposematic (warning) coloration in plants. In: Baluska F (ed) Plant-environment interactions. From sensory plant biology to active plant behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 167–202
Lev-Yadun S (2009b) Müllerian and Batesian mimicry rings of white-variegated aposematic spiny and thorny plants: a hypothesis. Isr J Plant Sci 57:107–116
Lev-Yadun S (2009d) Ant mimicry by Passiflora flowers? Isr J Entomol 39:159–163
Lev-Yadun S (2013b) The enigmatic fast leaflet rotation in Desmodium motorium: butterfly mimicry for defense? Plant Signal Behav 8:e24473
Lev-Yadun S (2014a) The proposed anti-herbivory roles of white leaf variegation. Prog Bot 76:241–269
Lev-Yadun S (2014c) Potential defence from herbivory by dazzle effects and trickery coloration of leaf variegation. Biol J Linn Soc 111:692–697
Lev-Yadun S, Inbar M (2002) Defensive ant, aphid and caterpillar mimicry in plants. Biol J Linn Soc 77:393–398
Lev-Yadun S, Ne’eman G (2012) Does bee or wasp mimicry by orchid flowers also deter herbivores? Arthropod Plant Interact 6:327–332
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640
Morris D (1990) Animal watching. A field guide to animal behaviour. Jonathan Cape, London
Nersesian CL, Banks PB, McArthur C (2011) Titrating the cost of plant toxins against predators: determining the tipping point for foraging herbivores. J Anim Ecol 80:753–760
Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:337–364
Purser B (2003) Jungle bugs: masters of camouflage and mimicry. Firefly Books, Toronto
Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073
Reeves JL (2011) Vision should not be overlooked as an important sensory modality for finding host plants. Environ Entomol 40:855–863
Reznicek G, Jurenitsch J, Robien W, Kubelka W (1989) Saponins in Cyclamen species: configuration of cyclamiretin C and structure of isocyclamin. Phytochem 28:825–828
Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2004) Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? Bioscience 54:755–766
Robbins RK (1980) The lycaened “false head” hypothesis: historical review and quantitative analysis. J Lepidopteran Soc 34:194–208
Robbins RK (1981) The ‘false head’ hypothesis: predation and wing pattern variation of lycaenid butterflies. Am Nat 118:770–775
Ruxton GD (2002) The possible fitness benefits of striped coat coloration for zebra. Mammal Rev 32:237–244
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack. The evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals & mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Santer RD (2013) Motion dazzle: a locust’s eye view. Biol Lett 9:20130811
Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R, Palmer CE, Cuthill IC (2011) Dazzle camouflage affects speed perception. PLoS One 6:e20233
Stanley RM II (1998) To fool a glass eye. Camouflage versus photoreconnaissance in World War II. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington D.C
Stevens M (2007) Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc R Soc B 274:1457–1464
Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:423–427
Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD (2008a) Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proc R Soc B 275:2639–2643
Stevens M, Searle WTL, Seymour JE, Marshall KLA, Ruxton GD (2011) Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses. BMC Biol 9:81
von Helversen B, Schooler LJ, Czienskowski U (2013) Are stripes beneficial? Dazzle camouflage influences perceived speed and hit rates. PLoS One 8:e61173
Waage JK (1981) How the zebra got its stripes – biting flies as selective agents in the evolution of zebra coloration. J Ent Soc Sth Afr 44:351–358
Warren J (2015) Is wind-mediated passive leaf movement an effective form of herbivore defence? Plant Ecol Evol 148:52–56
Warren J, James P (2008) Do flowers wave to attract pollinators? A case study with Silene maritima. J Evol Biol 21:1024–1029
Wickler W (1968) Mimicry in plants and animals. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
Wiens D (1978) Mimicry in plants. Evol Biol 11:365–403
Wilkinson N (1969) A brush with life. Seeley Service & Co Ltd, London
Williams D (2001) Naval camouflage 1914–1945. A complete visual reference. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis
Yamazaki K (2011) Gone with the wind: trembling leaves may deter herbivory. Biol J Linn Soc 104:738–747
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lev-Yadun, S. (2016). Potential Defense From Herbivory by Dazzle Effects and Trickery Coloration of Variegated Leaves. In: Defensive (anti-herbivory) Coloration in Land Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42096-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42096-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42094-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42096-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)