Abstract
The early 1990s saw a move against European-dominated discourses of heritage and the concept of authenticity in the World Heritage system, with the development of the Nara Document. The Document, now in its twentieth year from inception, articulated a developing Asian approach to authenticity, recognizing the ways and means to preserve cultural heritage with community participation and different understandings of heritage that existed outside Europe. Meanwhile, there was another significant development and split in ideas around cultural landscapes in the 1990s that has broadened wider interdisciplinary debates in heritage studies. Through the case study of the Borobudur Temple, which was the focus of large-scale interventions by UNESCO and the Japanese during the 1970s, this chapter explores the dichotomy between European monument-centered heritage approaches against the cultural landscapes concept developed in Japan. Overall, this chapter finds that at the time of the site’s nomination for inscription on the World Heritage List, the obligatory use of World Heritage criteria meant that the Indonesian authorities followed European ideas of heritage value. This resulted in continued postcolonial monument-centered heritage conservation and held back the shift of heritage management to community involvement and the practice of wider landscape protection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From February to March of 1975, a field survey was conducted and an interim report with three complementary Progress Reports was presented in April of the same year. In July, a supplementary field survey was constructed and, after careful review in Japan, a final draft was presented in December. Based on suggestions made by the Indonesian government, the draft was revised and the final study was presented in March of the following year. The conclusions and recommendations were established and agreed through step-by-step discussions with the two aforementioned ccommittees, following a detailed study of the project (Japan International Cooperation Agency 1976).
- 2.
First meeting on February 11 and 13 of 1975, second meeting on March 5 and 6 of 1975, third meeting on May 9 and 10 of 1975, fourth meeting on July 1, 2, and 10 of 1975, fifth meeting on September 29 and October 4 of 1975, sixth meeting from October 26 to November 8 of 1975, seventh meeting on December 22 and 24 of 1975 (Japan International Cooperation Agency 1976).
- 3.
The Study (Japan International Cooperation Agency 1976) notes that ‘A Park Authority will be established by Presidential order for the execution of the project. A special Council to be established by the final decision making body is to support the activities of the Park Authority. Certain subordinate organizations to the Park Authority in the different stages of the Project should also be provided’ (p. x).
- 4.
The study (Japan International Cooperation Agency 1976) refers to the Monument Act for the permanent protection of historical monuments.
References
Adishakti, L. (2015). Culttural Landsccape and Saujana Heritage. In K. Knaki, T. Larentna, L. T. Adishakti, & T. Fatimah (Eds.), Borobudur as cultural landscape – Local communities’ initiatives for the evolutive conservation of Pusaka Saujana Borobudur (pp. 1–16). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
Agency for Cultural Affairs, Japan. (2003). The report of the study on the protection of cultural landscapes associated with agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Tokyo: Japanese Government Press. Retrieved from http://www.bunka.go.jp/english/pdf/nourinsuisan.pdf.
Agency for Cultural Affairs, Japan. (2008). Invitation to the system of preservation districts for groups of historic buildings – People gather together and form towns: towns acquire culture. Tokyo: Japanese Government Press. Retrieved from http://www.bunka.go.jp/bunkazai/pamphlet/pdf/pamphlet_en_02.pdf.
Agency for Cultural Affairs, Japan. (2013). Cultural properties for the future generations – Outline of the cultural administration of Japan. Tokyo: Japanese Government Press. Retrieved from http://www.bunka.go.jp/bunkazai/pamphlet/pdf/pamphlet_en_03_ver04.pdf.
Akagawa, N. (2014). Heritage conservation in Japan’s cultural diplomacy: Heritage, national identify and national interest. New York: Routledge.
Amin, J. J. A. (2012). Cultural landscape in Java. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 73–89). London: Routledge.
Bandarin, F. (2009). Preface. In N. Mitchell, M. Rossler, & P.-M. Tricaud (Eds.), World heritage paper 26. World heritage cultural landscapes: A handbook for conservation and management (pp. 3–4). Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO, Bangkok. (2009). Hoi An protocols: Professional guidelines for assuring and preserving the authenticity of heritage sites in the context of the cultures of Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www2.unesccobkk.org/elig/publications/242/HoiAnProtocol.pdf.
Boccardi, G., Brooks, G., & Gurung, H. (2006). Reactive monitoring mission to Borobudur temple compounds, World Heritage Property, Indonesia. Mission report. Jakarta: UNESCO.
Boniface, P. (2000). Behind the scenes: tourism, and heritage, in the periphery to the French Mediterranean coast. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(2), 129–144. Routledge, London and New York.
Butland, R. (2012). Defining Angkor: The social, economic and political construction of scale in the management of cultural heritage areas. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 192–210). London: Routledge.
Byrne, D. (2008a). Heritage as social action. In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. H. Jameson Jr., & J. Schofield (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 149–173). London and New York: Routledge.
Byrne, D. (2008b). Western hegemony in archaeological heritage management. In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. H. Jameson Jr., & J. Schofield (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 229–234). London and New York: Routledge.
Byrne, D. (2009). A critique of unfeeling heritage. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 229–252). London: Routledge.
China ICOMOS. (2002). Principles for the conservation of heritage sites in China. CA: Getty Conservation Institute.
Daly, P. (2012). Fighting modernity: Traditional Chinese martial arts and the transmission of intangible cultural heritage. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 350–363). London: Routledge.
Deegan, N. (2012). The local-global nexus in the politics of World Heritage: space for community development? In M. Albert, M. Richon, M. J. Viñals, & A. Witcomb (Eds.), World heritage papers 31 – Community development through World Heritage (pp. 77–83). World Heritage Centre, Paris: UNESCO.
Engelhardt, R., Brooks, G., & Schorlemer, A. (2003). Reactive monitoring mission to Borobudur Temple compound, Central Java, Indonesia. Mission report. Jakarta: UNESCO.
Fong, K. L., Winter, T., Rii, H. U., Khanjanusthiti, P., & Tandon, A. (2012). Same same but different? A roundtable discussion on the philosophies, methodologies, and practicalities of conserving cultural heritage in Asia. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 39–54). London: Routledge.
Gillespie, J. (2013). World heritage protection and the human right to development: Reconciling competing or complimentary narratives using a Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA)? Sustainability, 5, 3159–3171. doi:10.3390/su5073159.
Hampton, M. P. (2005). Heritage, local communities and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 735–759. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.010. London: Pergamon.
Higuchi, T. (1975). Keikan No Kouzou – Landscape to Shiteno Nihon No Kuukan. Tokyo: Gihoudou [Landscape Structure - Japanese Perception's Space as Landscapes].
Holtorf, C. J. (2008). Is the past a non-renewable resource? In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. H. Jameson Jr., & J. Schofield (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 125–131). London and New York: Routledge.
ICOM. (2002). Shanghai charter. Paris: ICOM. Retrieved from http://archives.icom.museum/shanghai_charter.html.
ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara document on authenticity. Paris: ICOMOS.
ICOMOS. (2005). Xi’an declaration on the conservation of the setting of heritage structures, sites and areas. Paris: ICOMOS. Retrieved from http://www.icomos.org/xian2005/xian-declaration.pdf.
Inaba, N. (2012). Cultural landscapes in Japan: A century of concept development and management challenges. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 73–89). London: Routledge.
Ito, N. (2003). Intangible cultural heritage involved in tangible cultural heritage. ICOMOS 14 th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium. Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, 27–31 October.
Iwasaki, Y. (2009). Technical report on the mission to Indonesia for the coordination meeting for enhancing effective management for Borobudur Temple compounds. Mission Report. Indonesia: UNESCO Office, Jakarta.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (1974). Republic of Indonesia Central Java and Yogyakarta Area tourism development. Tokyo: JICA.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (1979). Republic of Indonesia Borobudur Prambanan National Archaeological Parks final report. Tokyo: JICA.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (1976). Republic of Indonesia National Archaeological Parks Project Borobudur Prambanan Central Java and Yogyakarta Area. Tokyo: JICA.
Kausar, D. R., & Nishikawa, Y. (2012). Heritage tourism in rural areas: Challenges for improving socio-economic impacts. In: Kaye Chon, Kaye (Eds.), Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2010: Routledge: 195–213.
Kausar, D. R., & Nishikawa, Y. (2012b). Heritage tourism in rural areas: Challenges for improving socio-economic impacts. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 15(2), 195–213. Kaye Chon, Kaye (Eds.), June 2010: Routledge.
Kompas. (1979a). The land around Borobudur and Prambanan to be regulated. Indonesia: Kompas-Gramedia Group.
Kompas. (1979b). For the development of National Archaeology Park: Inhabitants are asked to hand over their land. Indonesia: Kompas-Gramedia Group Publishing. October 5.
Lennon, J. L. (2012). Cultural landscape management: International influences. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 45–69). London: Routledge.
Lennon, J. L., & Taylor, K. (2012). Prospects and challenges for cultural landscape management. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 345–364). London: Routledge.
Lloyd, G. (2012). Legislating to safeguard Asia’s intangible heritage. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 139–152). London: Routledge.
Mitchell, N., & Melnick, R. Z. (2012). Shifting paradigms: New directions in cultural landscape conservation for a twenty-first-century America. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 45–69). London: Routledge.
Nagai, Y. (1977). The plan of an archaeological parks project: Borobudur and Prambanan. Technology and Economy. pp. 90–96. Tokyo: Japan Techno-Economics Society.
Nishimura, Y. (2005). From city planning to Machizukuri: A Japanese experience of community planning. In: ICP Forum, Taipei, Taiwan, 30 October–1 November 2005. Proceedings, Taipei City Government.
Peleggi, M. (2012). The unbearable impermanence of things: Reflections on Buddhism, cultural memory and heritage conservation. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 55–68). London: Routledge.
Priyana, J. (2015). Borobudur mandala: The temple compound and surrounding villages. In K. Knaki, L. T. Adishakti, T. Larentna, & T. Fatimah (Eds.), Borobudur as cultural landscape – local communities’ initiatives for the evolutive conservation of Pusaka Saujana Borobudur (pp. 93–104). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
Rahmi, D. H. (2015). The cultural landscape of Borobudur: Borobudur villages – continuity and change. In K. Knaki, L. T. Adishakti, T. Larentna, & T. Fatimah (Eds.), Borobudur as cultural landscape – local communities’ initiatives for the evolutive conservation of Pusaka Saujana Borobudur (pp. 39–58). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
Sekino, M. (1979). Mission Report of Republic of Indonesia Borobudur Prambanan National Archaeological Parks final report. Unpublished raw data. Mission Report. Tokyo.
Silverman, H., & Ruggles, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Intangible heritage embodied. New York: Springer.
Sirisrisak, T., & Akagawa, N. A. (2012). Concept and practice of cultural landscape protection in Thailand. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 21–44). London: Routledge.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (2009). Intangible heritage. London: Routledge.
Tanudirjo, D. A. (2013). Changing perspectives on the relationship between heritage landscape and local communities: A lesson from Borobudur. In S. Brockwell, S. O’Connor, & D. Byrne (Eds.), Transcending the culture-nature divide in cultural heritage: Views from the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 65–81). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Taylor, K. (2004). Cultural heritage management: A possible role for charters and principles in Asia (International Journal of Heritage Studies). London: Routledge.
Taylor, K. (2009). Cultural landscapes and Asia: Reconciling International and Southeast Asian Regional Values. Landscape Research, 34(1), 7–31.
Taylor, K. (2012a). Heritage challenges in Asian urban cultural landscape setting. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 266–279). London: Routledge.
Taylor, K. (2012b). Landscape and meaning – Context for a global discourse on cultural landscapes values. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (pp. 21–44). London: Routledge.
The Republic of Indonesia. (1990). Nomination File of Borobudur and Prambanan Temple Compounds in Indonesia for Inclusion in the World Heritage List. UNESCO Archive. WHC Nomination Documentation. File name: 592pdf. Indonesia: The Republic of Indonesia.
UNESCO. (2002). World Heritage paper 7 – Cultural landscapes: The challenges of convention. World Heritage Center. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2005). The restoration of Borobudur. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2009). World heritage papers 26. World heritage cultural landscapes – A handbook for conservation and management. Paris: World Heritage Centre, UNESCO. Nora Mitchell, Mechtild Rossler, & Pierre-Marie Tricaud. (Eds.).
UNESCO. (2014). Final report of revitalization of community livelihoods through creative industries and heritage tourism. Jakarta, Indonesia: UNESCO Office, Jakarta.
Wall, G., & Black, H. (2004). Global Heritage and local problems: Some examples from Indonesia. Current Issues in Tourism, 7(4–5), 436–439. London: Routledge.
Wang, S-Y. (2012). From a living city to a World Heritage City: Authorised heritage conservation and development and its impact on the local community. International Development Planning Review, Liverpool University Press: Vol. 34, Number 1/2012. Doi:10.3828/idpr.2012.2: 1-17.
Winter, T., & Daly, P. (2012). Heritage in Asia. In P. Daly & T. Winter (Eds.), Routledge handbook of heritage in Asia (pp. 1–35). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagaoka, M. (2016). Concept of Landscape Management at Borobudur in the 1970s. In: Cultural Landscape Management at Borobudur, Indonesia. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42046-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42046-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42045-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42046-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)