Skip to main content

Using Axiomatic Design to Identify the Elements That Affect the Evaluation of Comfort/Discomfort Perception

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 487))

Abstract

Knowledge about the effects of primary factors on comfort level is useful in Human-Machine-Interface (HMI) design. The study and the mathematical modeling of these effects strongly depends on cross relations between the different kinds of comfort, the primary factors’ effects, and the modifiers’ actions. Starting from a sizeable bibliographic analysis, this paper describes a study, based on the axiomatic design approach, of the interactions between the results, factors, and modifiers in comfort/discomfort evaluation. The modifiers’ influence was determined by measuring the changes in information content. This study allowed us to validate and optimize our equation for the perceived “level of well-being” in order to better study the perception of comfort/discomfort in HMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moes, N.C.C.M.: Analysis of sitting discomfort, a review. In: Bust, P.D., McCabe, P.T. (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London, 200—204 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vink, P., Hallbeck, S.: Editorial: comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 271–276 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C.: Proposal of a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 48, 25–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borg, G.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14, 377–381 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tilley, A.R.: The measure of man and woman. In: Human Factors in Design. Henry Dreyfuss, South Pasadena (US) Associates (2001). ISBN-13: 978-0471099550

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holzreiter, S.H., Köhle, M.E.: Assessment of gait patterns using neural networks. J. Biomech. 26(6), 645–651 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helander, M.G., Zhang, L.: Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics 40(9), 895–915 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Looze, M.P., Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Van Dien, J.H.: Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics 46(10), 985–997 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., de Groenesteijn, L., Looze, M.P., Vink, P.: Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. Appl. Ergon. 35(5), 453–458 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Korte, E.M., Huysmans, M.A., De Jong, A.M., Van de Ven, J.G.M., Ruijsendaal, M.: Effects of four types of non-obtrusive feedback on computer behavior, task performance and comfort. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 344–353 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vink, P., Bazley, C., Kamp, I., Blok, M.: Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 354–359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groenesteijn, L., Ellegast, R.P., Keller, K., Krause, F., Berger, H., De Looze, M.P.: Office task effects on comfort and body dynamics in five dynamic office chairs. Appl. Ergon. 43, 320–328 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellegast, R.P., Kraft, K., Groenesteijn, L., Krause, F., Berger, H., Vink, P.: Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 296–307 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R., Vallone, M.: Manual assembly workstation redesign based on a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Appl. Mech. Mater. 459, 368–379 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franz, M.M., Durt, A., Zenk, R., Desmet, P.M.A.: Comfort effects of a new car headrest with neck support. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 336–343 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong, Y.K., Kim, D.M., Lee, K.S., Jung, M.C.: Comparison of comfort, discomfort, and continuum ratings of force levels and hand regions during gripping exertions. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 283–289 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Oria, C., Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Pappalardo, M.: Postural analysis in HMI design: an extension of OCRA standard to evaluate discomfort level. J. Achievements in Mater. Manuf. Eng. 39, 60–70 (2010). ISSN 1734-8412

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kamp, I.: The influence of car seat design on its character experience. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 329–335 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Noro, K., Naruse, T., Lueder, R., Nao, N., Kozawa, M.: Application of Zen sitting principles to microscopic surgery seating. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 308–319 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naddeo, A., Apicella, M., Galluzzi, D.: Comfort-driven design of car interiors: a method to trace iso-comfort surfaces for positioning the dashboard commands, SAE Technical Papers n. 2015-01-1394 (2015). doi: 10.4271/2015-01-1394

  21. Kee, D., Lee, I.: Relationships between subjective and objective measures in assessing postural stresses. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 277–282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Naddeo, A., Memoli, S.: Postural comfort inside a car: development of an innovative model to evaluate the discomfort level. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 2(1), 1065–1070 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zenk, R., Franz, M., Bubb, H., Vink, P.: Spine loading in automotive seating. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 290–295 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Pardo, M., Riccio, A., Sessa, F., Naddeo, A., Talamo, L.: Methodology development for ergonomic analysis of work-cells in virtual environment, SAE Technical Papers n. 2008-01-1481 (2008). doi: 10.4271/2008-01-1481

  25. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N. Vallone, M., Califano, R.: New trend line of research about comfort evaluation: proposal of a framework for weighing and evaluating con-tributes coming from cognitive, postural and physiologic comfort perceptions. In: Vink P. (ed.) Advances in Social and Organizational Factors (2014). ISBN: 978-1495115721

    Google Scholar 

  26. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R., Vallone, M.: The role of expectation in comfort perception: the mattresses’ evaluation experience. Procedia Manuf. 3, 4784–4791 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Naddeo, A.: Virtual comfort evaluation as a new paradigm of health and safety in industrial engineering. Ind. Eng. Manage. 2, Editorial (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Apostolico, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C., Naddeo, A., Sestri, M.: Postural comfort evaluation: experimental identification of Range of Rest Posture for human articular joints. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 8(2), 109–120 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallgren, L.G., Hanse, J.J.: Job characteristics, motivators and stress among information technology consultants: a structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 37(1), 51–59 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic Design, Advances and applications. Oxford University press Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suh, N.P.: The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press Inc. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Donnarumma, A., Cappetti, N., Santoro, E.: Application of fuzzy measure to doxastic design process. In: Proceedings of 11th ICED’97, pp. 3, 115–118 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Naddeo, A.: Axiomatic design of a car bonnet: a new decoupling method based on fuzzy logic application. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10(9), 23859–23870 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Naddeo, A., Pappalardo, M.: Failure mode analysis using axiomatic design and non-probabilistic information. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164–165, 1423–1429 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Naddeo, A.: Optimization and solution approximation of design problems formulated by axiomatic design and paracomplete logic. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10(16), 38058–38064 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Naddeo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cappetti, N., Naddeo, A., Califano, R., Vallone, M. (2017). Using Axiomatic Design to Identify the Elements That Affect the Evaluation of Comfort/Discomfort Perception. In: Goossens, R. (eds) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 487. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41688-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41688-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41688-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics