Abstract
The min–max robust control synthesis for uncertain nonlinear systems is solved using Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model and fuzzy state observer. Existence conditions are derived for the output feedback min–max control in the sense of Lyapunov asymptotic stability and formulated in terms of linear matrix inequalities. The convex optimization algorithm is used to obtain the minimum upper bound on performance and the optimum parameters of min–max controller. The closed-loop system is asymptotically stable under the worst case disturbances and uncertainty. Benchmark of inverted pendulum plant is used to demonstrate the robust performance within a much larger equilibrium region of attraction achieved by the proposed design.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zak, S.H.: Systems and Control. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Driankov, D., Saffioti, A. (eds.): Fuzzy Logic Techniques for Autonomous Vehicle Navigataion. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, DE (2001)
Zadeh, L.A.: Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Inf. Sci. 178, 2751–2779 (2008)
Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Stability analysis and design of fuzzy control systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 45(2), 135–156 (1992)
Tanaka, K., Ikeda, T., Wang, H.O.: Robust stabilization of a class of uncertain nonlinear systems via fuzzy control: quadratic stabilizablilty, H ∞ control theory, and linear matrix inequalities. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4(1), 1–13 (1996)
Wang, H.O., Tanaka, K., Griffin, M.F.: An approach to fuzzy control of nonlinear systems: Stability and design issues. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4(1), 14–23 (1996)
Tanaka, K., Ikeda, T., Wang, H.O.: Fuzzy regulators and fuzzy observers: relaxed stability conditions and LMI-based designs. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 6(4), 250–265 (1998)
Leung, F.H.F., Lam, H.K., Tam, P.K.S.: Design of fuzzy controllers for uncertain nonlinear systems using stability and robustness analyses. Syst. Control Lett. 35(3), 237–243 (1998)
Kim, E., Lee, T.H.: New approaches to relaxed quadratic stability condition on fuzzy control systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6), 523–533 (2000)
Zheng, F., Wang, Q.-G., Lee, T.H.: Robust controller design for uncertain nonlinear systems via fuzzy modelling approach. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 34(1), 166–178 (2002)
Tong, S.-C., Li, H.-H.: Observer-based robust fuzzy control of nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 131(3), 165–184 (2002)
Kim, J., Park, D.: LMI-based design of stabilizing controllers for nonlinear systems described by Takagi-Sugeno model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 122(2), 73–82 (2003)
Liu, X., Zhang, Q.: New approaches to H ∞ controller designs based on fuzzy observers for fuzzy system via LMI. Automatica 39(12), 1571–1582 (2003)
Lin, C., Wang, Q.-G., Lee, T.H.: Improvement on observer-based H ∞ control for T-S fuzzy systems. Automatica 41(12), 1651–1656 (2005)
Guerra, T.M., Kruszewski, A., Vermeieren, L., Tirmant, H.: Conditions of output stabilization for nonlinear models in the Takagi-Sugeno’s form. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(9), 1248–1259 (2006)
Sala, A., Arino, C.: Asymptotically necessary and sufficient conditions for stability and performance in fuzzy control: applications of Polya’s theorem. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158(24), 2671–2686 (2007)
Yang, H., Dimirovski, G.M., Zhao, J.: Switched fuzzy systems: modelling representation, stability, and control. Chap. 9. In: Kacprzyk, J. (ed.) Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 109, pp. 155–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Tanaka, K., Wang, H.O.: Fuzzy Control System Design and Analysis: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach. Wiley (Canada) (2001)
Wu, H.-N., Cai, K.-Y.: H2 guaranteed cost fuzzy control for uncertain nonlinear systems via linear matrix inequalities. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 148(6), 411–429 (2004)
Wu, Z.-Q., Li, J., Gao, M.-J.: Guaranteed cost control for uncertain discrete fuzzy systems with delays. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 18(3), 95–101 (2004)
Assawinchiachote, W., Nguang, S.K., Shi, P.: H ∞ output feedback control design for uncertain fuzzy singularly disturbed systems: an LMI approach. Automatica 40(12), 2147–2152 (2005)
Jing, Y., Jiang, N., Zheng, Y., Dimirovski, G.M.: Fuzzy robust and non-fragile minimax control of a trailer-truck model. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1221–1226 (2007)
Kogan, M.M.: Solution to the inverse problem of minimax control and minimax robust control. Avtomatika i Telemechanika 53, 87–97 (1998). (in Russian)
Kogan, M.M.: Solution to the inverse problem of minimax control and worst case disturbance for linear continuous-time systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 43(5), 670–674 (1998)
Yoon, M., Utkin, V., Postletwhite, I.: On the worst-case disturbance of minimax optimal control. Automatica 41(7), 847–855 (2005)
MathWorks.: Using Matlab—LMI Toolbox. The Mathworks Inc, Natick, NJ
MathWorks.: Using Simulink—Version 5. The Mathworks Inc, Natick, NJ
Zadeh, L.A.: Inference in fuzzy logic. IEEE Proc. 68, 124–131 (1980)
Tuan, H.D., Apkarian, P., Narikiyo, T., Yamamoto, Y.: Parameterized linear matrix inequality techniques in fuzzy control system design. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9(2), 324–332 (2001)
Kolemishevska-Gugulovska, T., Stankovski, M., Rudas, I.J., Jiang, N., Jing, J.: A min-max control synthesis for uncertain nonlinear systems based on fuzzy T-S model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, IS 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria, 6–8 Sept 2012, pp. 303–310
Acknowledgments
The Authors gratefully acknowledge the crucial contribution by Professor Georgi M. Dimirovski in proving the theoretical results reported in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Proof of Theorem 1
Consider Lyapunov function candidate
hence \(V_{1} = x(t)^{T} P_{1} x(t)\), \(V_{2} = e(t)^{T} P_{2} e(t)\). Then it follows:
and
where \(H_{ij} = A_{i} - B_{i} K_{j}\). Hence
where \(\Sigma _{ij} = A_{i} - G_{i} C_{j}\),\(\Psi _{ij} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {A_{i} } & 0 \\ 0 & {\Sigma _{ij} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\), \(\tilde{D}_{i} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\bar{D}_{i} } \\ {\bar{D}_{i} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\).
Next, the following local checking function:
is constructed. Substitution of (34) into the above expression yields
Thus maximization of (36) about \(W\) yields
Because of \(\frac{{\partial^{2} \phi (t)}}{{\partial W^{2} }} = - 2 < 0\), (37) represents the parametric expression of the worst case disturbance [24–26] for system (16)–(17). Substitution of \(W^{ * }\) into (36) gives:
Minimization of the above expression about \(u\) yields
And for \(\frac{{\partial^{2} (\mathop {\hbox{max} }\limits_{W} \phi (t))}}{{\partial u^{2} }} = I > 0\), the (39) is the parametric expression of min–max controller for system (16)–(17) apparently. Next, the substitution of \(u^{ * }\) into (38) gives
where \(\tilde{B}_{i} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {B_{i} } \\ 0 \\ \end{array} } \right]\). Further, let it be denoted
Notice that if the following inequality is satisfied
then \(Q > 0\) holds true. Substitution of (37) and (39) into (34) yields
In turn, if \(\tilde{D}_{i} \tilde{D}_{j}^{T} - \tilde{B}_{i} \tilde{B}_{j}^{T} < 0\) and (39) hold, then \(\dot{V} < 0\) obviously. Thus the closed-loop system (16)–(17) is asymptotically stable and \(\xi (\infty ) = 0\). Pre- and post- multiplication of both sides of (41) by \(diag(P_{1}^{ - 1} ,P_{2}^{ - 1} )\), and then application of Schur’s complement yields
Apparently, the above expression is equivalent to (18)–(19) in Theorem 1. Now the integral of (42) is calculated; after some appropriate transpose, to give:
Therefore, due to Assumption 2 and via considering the expected value of the performance cost, it follows
Nonetheless, notice the initial state of a plant system can hardly be accurately measured in real-world practice.
Appendix 2
Proof of Theorem 2
From the proof of Theorem 1 it is seen if the inequality
is satisfied then apparently \(\dot{V} < 0\). That is, the closed-loop system (16)–(17) is asymptotically stable and \(\xi (\infty ) = 0\). Further, if \(\tilde{D}_{i} \tilde{D}_{j}^{T} -\) \(\tilde{B}_{i} \tilde{B}_{j}^{T} \ge 0\), then
and thus \(Q > 0\) is guaranteed. After pre- and post- multiplication of both sides of (23) by \(diag(P_{1}^{ - 1} ,P_{2}^{ - 1} )\), the application of Schur’s complement yields
As seen, the above expression is equivalent to (21). Now recall the proof of Theorem 1. After the appropriate transposing and then calculating the integral, the investigation of expected value of performance index yields
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kolemishevska-Gugulovska, T., Stankovski, M., Rudas, I.J., Jiang, N., Jing, J. (2017). Fuzzy T–S Model-Based Design of Min–Max Control for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems. In: Sgurev, V., Yager, R., Kacprzyk, J., Atanassov, K. (eds) Recent Contributions in Intelligent Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41438-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41438-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41437-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41438-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)