Skip to main content

‘Creative’ and Participatory Visual Approaches in Audience Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research

Abstract

Lobinger shows how visual communication research is not only concerned with the analysis of visual material and the related processes of production, reception, use and effects, but also focuses on the ways in which visuals can be used for research purposes. The chapter discusses a particularly valuable subgroup of enabling and creative techniques: creative visual methods, that is methods in which visual material is used or produced during the research process. Visual methods can be used as stand-alone approaches. However, as the chapter demonstrates, it is most useful to combine them with open-ended interviews, focus groups or observations. Lobinger presents findings from a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research through Q-sort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arthur, S., Martin M., Lewis J., et al. (2014) Designing Fieldwork. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton and R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (London: Sage), pp. 147–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awan, F. and Gauntlett, D. (2011) Creative and Visual Methods in Audience Research. In V. Nightingale (Ed.), The Handbook of Media Audiences (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 360–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and Kellner, H. (1964) Marriage and the Construction of Reality: An Exercise in the Microsociology of Knowledge. Diogenes 12(46): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2009) ‘Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals. Media, Culture & Society 31(4): 633–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfen, R. (2012) Differentiating Practices of Participatory Visual Media Production. In: E. Margolis and L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (London: Sage), pp. 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1957) Photography in Anthropology: A Report on Two Experiments. American Anthropologist 59(5): 843–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method (Albuquerque: University of New Mexiko Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. and Michelle, C. (2011) Q methodology in Audience Research: Bridging the Qualitative/Quantitative ‘Divide’? Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 8(2): 559–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, K. and Goldberg, A. (1996) Weight Control Self-efficacy Types and Transitions Affect Weight-loss Outcomes in Obese Women. Addictive Behaviors 21(1): 103–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, S. and Tenenberg, J. (2005) Making Sense of Card Sorting Data. Expert Systems 22(3): 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper, M. and Schönhuth, M. (in print) Zeigen, was sich nicht sagen lässt – Ansätze und Verfahren der Visuellen Netzwerkforschung [Showing What Can’t be Said]. In: K. Lobinger (Ed.), Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung [Handbook of Visual Communication Research] (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper, M., Schönhuth, M. and Kronenwett, M. (2011) Bringing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Together: Collecting Network Data with the Help of VennMaker. In M. Safar and K. Mahdi (Eds.), Social Networking and Community Behavior Modeling: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures (Hershey: IGI Global), pp. 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grittmann, E. and Ammann, I. (2011) Quantitative Bildtypenanalyse [Quantitative Image Type Analysis]. In T. Petersen and C. Schwender (Eds.), Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder. Methoden zur Erforschung visueller Kommunikation [Deciphering Images: Methods to Research Visual Communication] (Köln: Herbert von Halem), pp. 163–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, M. (2012) Ubiquitous Photography (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (1986) Meaning and Work: A Study in Photo Elicitation. Current Sociology 34(3): 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2002) Talking About Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation. Visual Studies 17(1): 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawhee, D. and Messaris, P. (2009) Review Essay: What’s Visual about ‘Visual Rhetoric’? Quarterly Journal of Speech 95(2): 210–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A., Berg, M. and Roitsch, C. (2014) Mediatized Worlds of Communitization: Young People as Localists, Centrists, Multi-localists and Pluralists. In A. Hepp and F. Krotz (Eds.), Mediatized Worlds: Culture and Society in a Media Age (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 174–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. and Hink, D. (1959) A Comparison of Forced vs. Free Q-Sort Procedure. The Journal of Educational Research 53(3): 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapenta, F. (2012) Some Theoretical and Methodological Views on Photo-Elicitation. In E. Margolis and L. Pauwels L (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (London: Sage), pp. 201–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobinger, K. (forthcoming) Visual Research Methods. In: J. Matthes (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobinger, K. and Brantner, C. (2015a) In the Eye of the Beholder: Subjective Views on the Authenticity of Selfies. International Journal of Communication 9: 1848–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobinger, K. and Brantner, C. (2015b) Likable, Funny or Ridiculous? A Q-sort Study on Audience Perceptions of Visual Portrayals of Politicians. Visual Communication 14(1): 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobinger, K. and Brantner, C. (2015c) Q-Sort: Qualitativ-quantitative Analysen bildlicher Rezeptions- und Aneignungsprozesse. Leistungen und Limitationen für das Feld Visueller Kommunikationsforschung [Q-sort: Qualitative-quantitative Analyses of Visual Reception and Appropriation Processes]. In K. Lobinger and and S. Geise (Eds.), Visualisierung – Mediatisierung. Kommunikation und bildliches Handeln in mediatisierten Gesellschaften [Visualization—Mediatization] (Köln: Halem), pp. 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobinger, K. and Brantner, C. (2016) Different Ways of Seeing Depictions of Politicians: A Qualitative–Quantitative Analysis Using Q Methodology. Communications 41(1), pp. 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2007) What is Visual Communication? Past and Future of an Emerging Field of Communication Research. Studies in Communication Science 7(2): 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., et al. (2013) On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement. Global Environmental Change 23(2): 413–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2008) Taking and Using. Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly 15(4): 243–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2012) An Integrated Conceptual Framework for Visual Social Research. In: E. Margolis and L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (London: Sage), pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T., Gustafson, B. and Popovich, M. (2008) Perceptions of Negative Stereotypes of Older People in Magazine Advertisements: Comparing the Perceptions of Older Adults and College Students. Ageing & Society 28(2): 233–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, G. and McGeorge, P. (1997) The Sorting Techniques: A Tutorial Paper on Card Sorts, Picture Sorts and Item Sorts. Expert Systems 14(2): 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönhuth, M. and Gamper, M. (2013) Visuelle Netzwerkforschung. Eine thematische Annäherung [Visual Network Analysis]. In: M. Schönhuth, M. Gamper M and M. Kronenwett et al. (Eds.), Visuelle Netzwerkforschung. Qualitative, quantitative und partizipative Zugänge [Visual Network Analysis] (Bielefeld: transkript), pp. 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. (1989) Visual Ethnography: Using Photography in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology 12(2): 119–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, T. (1985) Q-Methodology in Communication Science: An Introduction. Communication Quarterly 33(3): 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, W. (1935) Correlating Persons Instead of Tests. Journal of Personality 4(1): 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, W. (1953) The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van House, N. (2009) Collocated Photo Sharing, Story-telling, and the Performance of Self. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(12): 1073–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, S. and Stenner, P. (2012) Doing Q Methodological Research. Theory, Method and Interpretation (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Clark, A. and Prosser, J. (2012a) Visual Research Ethics at the Crossroads. In: E. Margolis and L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (London: Sage), pp. 685–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., et al. (2012b) Ethical Regulation and Visual Methods: Making Visual Research Impossible or Developing Good Practice? Sociological Research Online 17(1): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/8.html (accessed 10 January 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Lobinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lobinger, K. (2016). ‘Creative’ and Participatory Visual Approaches in Audience Research. In: Kubitschko, S., Kaun, A. (eds) Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics