Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Synergy Value and Strategic Management

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 2070 Accesses

Abstract

This book advances the ongoing debate about the failure rate of mergers and acquisitions that has remained consistently intense and in doing answers to the call for a greater recognition of M&A processes (Cartwright and Schoenberg, Br J Manag 17:s1–s5, 2006). Moreover, we enrich the fragmented M&A literature and we provide strong insights and implications for managers’ commitment to synergy (Haleblian et al., J Manag 35:469–502, 2009; Knudsen, The essential tension in the social sciences: between the “unification” and “fragmentation” trap, Edward Elgar, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barker RG (1999) The role of dividends in valuation models used by analysts and fund managers. Eur Account Rev 8(2):195–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw J, Bresman H, Håkanson L (2000) Managing the post-acquisition integration process: how the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. J Manag Stud 37(3):395–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright S, Schoenberg R (2006) Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: recent advances and future opportunities. Br J Manag 17(S1):s1–s5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S (1986) Types of synergy and economic value: the impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strateg Manag J 7(2):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo G, Conca V, Buongiorno M, Gnan L (2007) Integrating cross-border acquisitions: a process-oriented approach. Long Range Plan 40(2):202–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland T (1994) Why Value Value? McKinsey Q 4:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran A (2005) The value of synergy. Stern School of Business, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirakos EG, Strong N, Walker M (2004) What valuation models do analysts use? Account Horiz 18(4):221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devos E, Kadapakkam P, Krishnamurthy S (2009) A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. Rev Financ Stud 22(3):1179–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles RG, Lanes KL, Wilson TC (1999) Are you paying too much for that acquisition? Harv Bus Rev 77(4):136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino R, Garzella S (2015a) Synergy pitfalls management in mergers and acquisitions. Manag Decis 53(7):1469–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino R, Garzella S (2015b) The synergy valuation models: towards the real value of mergers and acquisitions. Int Res J Financ Econ 124:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzella S (2006) Il governo delle sinergie. Giappichelli, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzella S, Fiorentino R (2014) A synergy measurement model to support the pre-deal decision making in mergers and acquisitions. Manag Decis 52(6):1194–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes E, Angwin DN, Weber Y, Tarba SY (2013) Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: revealing pre- and post-M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 55(1):13–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goold M, Campbell A (1998) Desperately seeking synergy. Harv Bus Rev 76:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian J, Devers C, McNamara G, Carpenter M, Davison R (2009) Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: a review and research agenda. J Manag 35(3):469–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1998) The hidden traps in decision making. Harv Bus Rev 76(5):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding D, Rovit S (2005) Mastering the merger: four critical decisions that make or break the deal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing acquisitions. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MLA (2002) When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strateg Manag J 23(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt M, King D, Kriishnan H, Makri M, Schijven K, Zhu H (2009) Mergers and acquisitions: overcoming pitfalls, building synergy, and creating value. Bus Horiz 52(6):523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imam S, Barker R, Clubb C (2008) The use of valuation models by UK Investment Analysts. Eur Account Rev 17(3):503–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DR, Dalton DR, Daily CD, Covin JG (2004) Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators. Strateg Manag J 25(2):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen C (2003) The essential tension in the social sciences: between the “unification” and “fragmentation” trap. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R, Finkelstein S (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: a case survey of synergy realization. Organ Sci 10(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietdka JM (1998) Synergy revisited: how a “Screwball Buzzword” can be good for the bottom line. Bus Strateg Rev 9(2):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee TK, Kiymaz H, Baker K (2004) Merger motives and target valuation: a survey of evidence from CFOs. J Appl Financ 14(2):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter Liebeskind J (2000) Internal capital markets: benefits, costs, and organizational arrangements. Organ Sci 11(1):58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton LM (1988) Strategic business fits and corporate acquisitions: empirical evidence. Strateg Manag J 9(3):279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1986) Postmerger integration. J Bus Strategy 7(1):65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirower ML (1997) Synergy trap: how companies lose the acquisition game. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl GK, Angwin DN, Very P, Gomes E, Weber Y, Tarba SY, Noorderhaven N, Benyamini H, Bouckenooghe D, Chreim S, Durand M, Hassett ME, Kokk G, Mendenhall ME, Mirc N, Miska C, Park KM, Reynolds N-S, Rouzies A, Sarala RM, Seloti SL, Søndergaard M, Yildiz HE (2013) Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 55(4):333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara E (2003) Post-acquisition Integration as sensemaking: glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy, and politicization. J Manag Stud 40(4):859–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strateg Manag J 32:624–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M, Meier D (2008) What Is M&A performance? Acad Manag Perspect 22(3):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garzella, S., Fiorentino, R. (2017). Conclusions. In: Synergy Value and Strategic Management. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40671-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics