Abstract
Analyzing the video archive of personal narratives curated by the Where Are You From? project, the author argues that public immigration discourses are conditioned by sentimentalism. Two effects of this generic conditioning are explicated. First, through the displacement of attention from a conflicted present to an imagined past, Americans may commemorate mythic immigrants while passing anti-immigration laws. Second, sentimentalism transposes immigration from a potentially deliberative to a perennially epideictic register. The author’s first implication is a rationale for generic awareness. If and when the only genre in which the public is able or willing to engage the subject of immigration is sentimentalism, moderating this impulse is prudent. A second implication pertains to the genre’s impact on spaces that are conceived and celebrated for public engagement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beasley Von Burg, Alessandra. 2010. Caught between history and imagination: Vico’s Ingenium for a rhetorical renovation of citizenship. Philosophy & Rhetoric 43: 26–53.
———. 2012. “Stochastic citizenship: Toward a rhetoric of mobility.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 45: 351–375.
Berlant, Lauren. 1998. Poor Eliza. American Literature 70: 635–668.
Black, Edwin. 1978. The sentimental style as escapism, or the devil with Dan’l Webster. In form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action, eds. Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Falls Church: Speech Communication Association.
———. 1992. Rhetorical questions: Studies of public discourse. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bodnar, John. 1992. Remaking America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Browne, Stephen. 1994. Like gory spectres’: Representing evil in theodore weld’s American slavery as it is. Quarterly Journal of Speech 80: 277–292.
Brummett, Barry. 2008. A rhetoric of style. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, eds. 1978. Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. Falls Church: Speech Communication Association.
Chapman, Mary, and Glenn Hendler, eds. 1999. Sentimental men: Masculinity and the politics of affect in American culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Condit, Celeste Michelle. 1989. The functions of epideictic: The Boston massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly 33: 284–299.
Dean, Jodi. 2002. Publicity’s secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
———. 2005. Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics 1: 51–74.
Fisher, Walter R. 1984. Narration as human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs 51: 1–22.
Frisch, Michael H. 1990. A shared authority: Essays on the craft and meaning of oral and public history. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On collective memory. Trans: Lewis A. Coser. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hariman, Robert. 1995. Political style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hartnett, Stephen. 2002. Fanny Fern’s 1855 Ruth Hall, the cheerful brutality of capitalism, & the irony of sentimental rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech 88: 1–18.
Lipsitz, George. 1990. Time passages: Collective memory and American popular culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Maddock Dillon, Elizabeth. 2004. Sentimental aesthetics. American Literature 76: 495–523.
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Owens, Patricia A. 2004. Xenophilia, gender, and sentimental humanitarianism. Alternatives 29: 285–304.
Parry-Giles, Shawn J., and Trevor Parry-Giles. 2000. Collective memory, political nostalgia, and the rhetorical presidency: Bill Clinton’s commemoration on the March on Washington, August 28, 1998. Quarterly Journal of Speech 86: 417–437.
Thompson, Paul Richard. 1988. The voice of the past: Oral history, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wells, Caragh. 2008. The case for nostalgia and sentimentality in manuel Vázquez Montalbán’s ‘Serie Carvalho. Hispanic Review 76: 281–297.
Wilson, Kirt. 2008. Rhetoric and race in the American experience: The promises and perils of sentimental memory. In Sizing up rhetoric, eds. David Zarefsky and Elizabeth Benacka. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartelius, E.J. (2017). Sentimentalism in Online Deliberation: Assessing the Generic Liability of Immigration Discourses. In: Miller, C., Kelly, A. (eds) Emerging Genres in New Media Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40294-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40295-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)