Abstract
Thomas Schelling’s two influential books, The Strategy of Conflict and Arms and Influence, remain foundational works for that thriving branch of realism that explores strategic bargaining. They illustrate the pitfalls of deduction in a political, cultural and ethical vacuum. In the real world, signals and reference points are only recognized and understood in context, and that context is a function of the history, culture and the prior experience of actors with one other. Schelling’s works on bargaining — and many of the studies in the research program to which he contributed — are unwitting prisoners of a particular language and context: microeconomics and a parochial American Cold War view of the world. They lead Schelling to misrepresent the actual dynamics of the bargaining encounters (Cuba and Vietnam) that he uses to illustrate and justify his approach. Schelling’s writing on bargaining is emblematic of a more general and still dominant American approach to the world that seeks, when possible, to substitute a combination of technical fixes and military muscle for political insight and diplomatic finesse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This text was first published as: “Reason Divorced from Reality: Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining”, in: International Politics (2006) 43, 429–452; at: doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800164 for which the author retained the copyright.
- 2.
An earlier version of this article ‘Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining,’ appeared in International Studies 51 (Summer 1996), pp. 555–576.
- 3.
This theme is more fully developed in The Strategy of Conflict.
- 4.
Clausewitz, On War, Book 6, Chapter 26, ‘The People in Arms,’ makes the same point as Schelling. He observes that the national resistance movement in Spain sought to inflict punishment directly on their adversary.
- 5.
Janice Gross Stein made this argument in the Yorkside Cafeteria in 1965 following Schelling’s first lecture on ‘Arms and Influence,’ and predicted that the bombing campaign would fail to humble Hanoi.
- 6.
Kaplan, The Wizards of Armageddon, 332–335, reports that Schelling recommended that the bombing campaign be given three weeks to show results.
- 7.
References
Alexei Adzhubei interview, Moscow, May 15, 1989.
Burr, W. and Richelson, J.T. (2000-01) ‘Whether to ‘Strangle the Baby in the Cradle’: The United States and the Chinese Nuclear Program, 1960-64’, International Security 25(1): 54-99.
Clausewitz, C. (1976) M. Howard and P. Paret (eds. and trans), On War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Duiker, W.J. (1996) The Communist Road to Power in Vietnam, Boulder, CO: Westview.
Fiske, S.T. and Taylor, S.E. (1984) Social Cognition, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hopf, T. (1994) Deterrence Theory and American Foreign Policy in the Third World, 1965-1990, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kahin, G.McT. (1986) Intervention: How American Became Involved in Vietnam, New York: Knopf.
Kaplan, F. (1983) The Wizards of Armageddon, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Koffka, K. (1935) Principles of Gestalt Psychology, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Kohler, W. (1938) The Place of Value in a World of Facts, New York: Liveright.
Khrushchev, N.S. (1990) Khrushchev Remembers: The Glasnost Tapes, J. Schecter (trans.), Boston: Little, Brown.
Lebow, R.N. (1981) Between Peace and War. The Nature of International Crisis, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Lebow, R.N. (1996) The Art of Bargaining, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lebow, R.N. (1998) ‘Beyond Parsimony: Rethinking Theories of Coercive Bargaining’, European Journal of International Relations 4(1): 31-66.
Lebow, R.N. and Stein, J.G. (1994) We All Lost the Cold War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McNamara, R.S., Blight, J.G. and Brigham, R.K. (1999) Argument Without End: In Search of Answers to the Vietnam Tragedy, New York: Public Affairs.
The Pentagon Papers (1971) The Defense Department History of United States Decision making in Vietnam, Senator Gravel edition, Vol. 3, Boston: Beacon Press.
Schelling, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. (1966) Arms and Influence, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sebenius, J.K. (1992) ‘Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities’, International Organization 46(1): 322-366.
Turley, W.S. (1986) The Second Indochina War: A Short Political and Military History, 1954-1975, Boulder, CO: Westview.
Tsou, T. (1963) America’s Failure in China, 1941-1950, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Welch , D A. (ed.) (1989) Proceedings of the Hawk’s Cay Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for Science and International Affairs.
Whiting, A.S. (1960) China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War, New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lebow, R.N. (2016). Reason Divorced from Reality: Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining. In: Lebow, R. (eds) Richard Ned Lebow: Essential Texts on Classics, History, Ethics, and International Relations. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40024-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40024-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40023-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40024-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)