Abstract
The quantitative classification techniques are based on geostatistically quantified uncertainties in the estimated resource and reserve values. This should include estimation of the uncertainties in grade, volume (which is largely controlled by the geological interpretation and constraints), samples quality and tonnage factor. The quantitative classification methods were traditionally focused on the grades estimation uncertainties which are discussed in this chapter. The most commonly used methods include estimation variance approximately estimated using auxiliary geostatistical functions (e.g. F-function) and empirically estimated resource uncertainties, obtained using conditional simulation methods. The most efficient way of using the estimation errors for classification resources is by relating them to the production rates, including the annual, quarterly and monthly productions.
These methods allow to quantify the quality of the estimate but doesn’t address issues such as the data quality and robustness of the underlying geological model. If there are any significant uncertainties in either of these two items then the final classification should reflect this.
References
Abzalov MZ (2008) Quality control of assay data: a review of procedures for measuring and monitoring precision and accuracy. Exp Min Geol J 17(3–4):131–144
Abzalov MZ (2010) Optimisation of ISL resource models by incorporating algorithms for quantification risks: geostatistical approach. In: Technical meeting on in situ leach (ISL) uranium mining, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 7–10 June, 2010
Abzalov MZ (2013) Measuring and modelling of the dry bulk density for estimation mineral resources. Appl Earth Sci 122(1):16–29
Abzalov MZ, Mazzoni P (2004) The use of conditional simulation to assess process risk associated with grade variability at the corridor sands detrital ilmenite deposit. In: Dimitrakopoulus R, Ramazan S (eds) Ore body modelling and strategic mine planning: uncertainty and risk management. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 93–101
Abzalov MZ, Bower J (2009) Optimisation of the drill grid at the Weipa bauxite deposit using conditional simulation. In: Seventh international mining geology conference, AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 247–251
Abzalov MZ, Bower J (2014) Geology of bauxite deposits and their resource estimation practices. Appl Earth Sci 123(2):118–134
Abzalov MZ, Menzel B, Wlasenko M, Phillips J (2010) Optimisation of the grade control procedures at the Yandi iron-ore mine, Western Australia: geostatistical approach. Appl Earth Sci 119(3):132–142
Abzalov MZ, van der Heyden A, Saymeh A, Abuqudaira M (2015) Geology and metallogeny of Jordanian uranium deposits. Appl Earth Sci 124(2):63–77
Annels AE (1991) Mineral deposit evaluation, a practical approach. Chapman and Hall, London, p 436
Arik A (1999) An alternative approach to resource classification. In: Proceedings of the 1999 computer applications in the mineral industries (APCOM) symposium, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, pp 45–53
Blackwell G (1998) Relative kriging error – a basis for mineral resource classification. Exp Min Geol 7(1–2):99–105
Davis B (1992) Confidence interval estimation for minable reserves. SME Preprint 92–39:7
Dielhl P, David M (1982) Classification of ore reserves/resources based on geostatistical methods. CIM Bull 75(838):127–135
Dimitrakopoulos R (2002) Orebody uncertainty, risk assessment and profitability in recoverable reserves, ore selection and mine planning: workshop course. BRC, The University of Queensland, p 304
Ferenczi PA (2001) Iron ore, manganese and bauxite deposits of the Northern Territory. Northern Territory Geological Survey Report 13. Darwin, Government Printer of the Northern Territory, p 113
JORC Code (2012) Australaisian code for reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves. AusIMM, Melbourne, p 44
Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York, p 600
Krige D (1996) A practical analysis of the effects of spatial structure and of data available and accessed, on conditional biases in ordinary kriging. In: Geostatistics, Wollongong ‘96, v2, pp 799–810
Olea RA (ed) (1991) Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary. Oxford University Press, New York, p 177
Rossi ME, Camacho JE (2004) Application of conditional simulation to resource classification scheme. CIM Bull 97(1079):62–68
Royle AG (1977) How to use geostatistics for ore reserve classification. World Min 30:52–56
Schofield NA (2001) Determining optimal drilling densities for near mine resources. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserves estimation – the AusIMM guide to good practice. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 293–298
Sinclair AJ, Blackwell GH (2000) Resource/reserve classification and the qualified person. CIM Bull 93(1038):29–35
Snowden DV (2001) Practical interpretation of mineral resource and ore reserve classification guidelines. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation – the AusIMM guide to good practice. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 643–652
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abzalov, M. (2016). Methodology of the Mineral Resource Classification. In: Applied Mining Geology. Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39264-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39264-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39263-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39264-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)