Skip to main content

Methodology of the Mineral Resource Classification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Mining Geology

Part of the book series: Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences ((MASE,volume 12))

  • 3304 Accesses

Abstract

The quantitative classification techniques are based on geostatistically quantified uncertainties in the estimated resource and reserve values. This should include estimation of the uncertainties in grade, volume (which is largely controlled by the geological interpretation and constraints), samples quality and tonnage factor. The quantitative classification methods were traditionally focused on the grades estimation uncertainties which are discussed in this chapter. The most commonly used methods include estimation variance approximately estimated using auxiliary geostatistical functions (e.g. F-function) and empirically estimated resource uncertainties, obtained using conditional simulation methods. The most efficient way of using the estimation errors for classification resources is by relating them to the production rates, including the annual, quarterly and monthly productions.

These methods allow to quantify the quality of the estimate but doesn’t address issues such as the data quality and robustness of the underlying geological model. If there are any significant uncertainties in either of these two items then the final classification should reflect this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abzalov MZ (2008) Quality control of assay data: a review of procedures for measuring and monitoring precision and accuracy. Exp Min Geol J 17(3–4):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ (2010) Optimisation of ISL resource models by incorporating algorithms for quantification risks: geostatistical approach. In: Technical meeting on in situ leach (ISL) uranium mining, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 7–10 June, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ (2013) Measuring and modelling of the dry bulk density for estimation mineral resources. Appl Earth Sci 122(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Mazzoni P (2004) The use of conditional simulation to assess process risk associated with grade variability at the corridor sands detrital ilmenite deposit. In: Dimitrakopoulus R, Ramazan S (eds) Ore body modelling and strategic mine planning: uncertainty and risk management. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Bower J (2009) Optimisation of the drill grid at the Weipa bauxite deposit using conditional simulation. In: Seventh international mining geology conference, AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Bower J (2014) Geology of bauxite deposits and their resource estimation practices. Appl Earth Sci 123(2):118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Menzel B, Wlasenko M, Phillips J (2010) Optimisation of the grade control procedures at the Yandi iron-ore mine, Western Australia: geostatistical approach. Appl Earth Sci 119(3):132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, van der Heyden A, Saymeh A, Abuqudaira M (2015) Geology and metallogeny of Jordanian uranium deposits. Appl Earth Sci 124(2):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annels AE (1991) Mineral deposit evaluation, a practical approach. Chapman and Hall, London, p 436

    Google Scholar 

  • Arik A (1999) An alternative approach to resource classification. In: Proceedings of the 1999 computer applications in the mineral industries (APCOM) symposium, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, pp 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell G (1998) Relative kriging error – a basis for mineral resource classification. Exp Min Geol 7(1–2):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B (1992) Confidence interval estimation for minable reserves. SME Preprint 92–39:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielhl P, David M (1982) Classification of ore reserves/resources based on geostatistical methods. CIM Bull 75(838):127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R (2002) Orebody uncertainty, risk assessment and profitability in recoverable reserves, ore selection and mine planning: workshop course. BRC, The University of Queensland, p 304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi PA (2001) Iron ore, manganese and bauxite deposits of the Northern Territory. Northern Territory Geological Survey Report 13. Darwin, Government Printer of the Northern Territory, p 113

    Google Scholar 

  • JORC Code (2012) Australaisian code for reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves. AusIMM, Melbourne, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York, p 600

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige D (1996) A practical analysis of the effects of spatial structure and of data available and accessed, on conditional biases in ordinary kriging. In: Geostatistics, Wollongong ‘96, v2, pp 799–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea RA (ed) (1991) Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary. Oxford University Press, New York, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi ME, Camacho JE (2004) Application of conditional simulation to resource classification scheme. CIM Bull 97(1079):62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle AG (1977) How to use geostatistics for ore reserve classification. World Min 30:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield NA (2001) Determining optimal drilling densities for near mine resources. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserves estimation – the AusIMM guide to good practice. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 293–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair AJ, Blackwell GH (2000) Resource/reserve classification and the qualified person. CIM Bull 93(1038):29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden DV (2001) Practical interpretation of mineral resource and ore reserve classification guidelines. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation – the AusIMM guide to good practice. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 643–652

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abzalov, M. (2016). Methodology of the Mineral Resource Classification. In: Applied Mining Geology. Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39264-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics