Abstract
This chapter assesses the role of risk governance and risk communication in CSR, with particular reference to how an operator’s attention to the social dimensions of risk may affect its ability (or otherwise) to be granted a social licence to operate (SLO). This issue is explored through the lens of potential effects of energy infrastructure on the environment, with particular reference to sub-seabed carbon dioxide storage (as part of larger carbon dioxide capture and storage processes) and marine radioactive contamination following the Fukushima nuclear accident. I argue that due to the hugely value-laden nature of risk perception associated with energy and environmental change, honesty about uncertainties and remediation/contingency plans, sincerity in motivations for taking risks, and respect for public and stakeholder understandings of risk must all be considered as part of an operator’s risk management strategy. In terms of implications for thinking about CSR and SLOs, I conclude that the case studies presented reinforce extant thinking on the role of communities’ values in the granting of an SLO and the need for developers to on occasion go beyond their legal requirements for risk management if they are to receive an SLO. However, I also suggest that the potentially far-reaching impacts of energy technologies raise challenges for the traditional focus in SLO thinking on ‘local’ community effects, and for the assumption that the end goal should always be for a project to proceed in a particular location.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arvai, J. (2014). The end of risk communication as we know it. Journal of Risk Research, 17(10), 1245–1249.
Asanuma-Brice, C. (2014). Beyond reality – or – An illusory ideal: Pro-nuclear Japan’s management of migratory flows in a nuclear catastrophe. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 12(47), 1.
Bailly du Bois, P., Garreau, P., Laguionie, P., & Korsakissok, I. (2014). Comparison between modelling and measurement of marine dispersion, environmental half-time and 137Cs inventories after the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. Ocean Dynamics, 64(3), 361–383.
Blackford, J., Stahl, H., Bull, J., Bergès, B., Cevatoglu, M., Lichtschlag, A., Connelly, D., James, R., Kita, J., Long, D., Naylor, M., Shitashima, K., Smith, D., Taylor, P., Wright, I., Akhurst, M., Chen, B., Gernon, T., Hauton, C., Hayashi, M., Kaieda, H., Leighton, T., Sato, T., Sayer, M., Suzumura, M., Tait, K., Vardy, M., White, P., & Widdicombe, S. (2014). Detection and impacts of leakage from sub-seafloor deep geological carbon dioxide storage. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1011–1016.
Buesseler, K. (2012). Fishing for answers off Fukushima. Science, 338, 480–482.
Buesseler, K., Aoyama, M., & Fukasawa, M. (2011). Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(23), 9931–9935.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame. London: Routledge.
Duetschke, E. (2010). What drives local public acceptance – comparing two cases from Germany. Energy Procedia, 4, 6234–6240.
Feenstra, C. F. J., Mikunda, T., & Brunsting, S. (2010). What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Energy Research Centre for the Netherlands.
Fisheries Agency of Japan. (2015). The leakage of contaminated water at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station and the safety of fishery products (provisional translation). Tokyo: Fisheries Agency of Japan.
Fukushima InForm. (2015). Fukushima contamination detected at shoreline in British Columbia. http://fukushimainform.ca/2015/04/06/fukushima-contamination-detected-at-shoreline-in-british-columbia/
Fukushima Prefecture. (2015). Emergency monitoring results for marine produce in Fukushima Prefecture (in Japanese). http://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/sec/36035e/suisanka-monita-top.html
Fukushima Prefecture Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations. (2015). Undertaking of trial fisheries in Fukushima Prefecture (in Japanese). http://www.jf-net.ne.jp/fsgyoren/siso/sisotop.html
Gough, C., & Boucher, P. (2013). Ethical attitudes to underground CO2 storage: Points of convergence and potential faultlines. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 13, 156–167.
Greenpeace. (2015). Carbon capture scam (CCS): How a false solution bolsters big oil. Washington, DC: Greenpeace. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/planet3/PDFs/Carbon-Capture-Scam.pdf.
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social licence and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29, 307–341.
Haszeldine, S. (2012). Zoback and Goerlick PNAS 2012: Comment by Stuart Haszeldine. Edinburgh: Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage. http://www.sccs.org.uk/images/expertise/reports/working-papers/wp-2012-01.pdf.
Howell, R., Shackley, S., Mabon, L., Ashworth, P., & Jeanneret, T. (2014). Engaging the public with low-carbon energy technologies: Results from a Scottish large group process. Energy Policy, 66, 496–506.
Katsukawa, T. (2012, November 12–13). Communication & risk: How can we improve communication of radioactivity and its associated risks with the public? The Accidents at Fukushima Dai-Ichi: Exploring the Impacts of Radiation on the Ocean Science Symposium, University of Tokyo, Tokyo. http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id=138574&pt=2&p=141589
Kawazoe, S., Urano, M., & Nozaka, S. (2014). The complex disaster and its damage and social impact on society – the case of Iwaki City, Fukushima Prefecture. In Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) Reconstruction From the Disaster Project (Ed.), Sociology in the post-disaster society (pp. 80–94). Tokyo: Meiji Gakuin University.
Kimura, A. H., & Katano, Y. (2014). Farming after the Fukushima accident: A feminist political ecology analysis of organic agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 108–116.
Kyodo News. (2015, February 25). Fukushima Prefecture Fisheries Association: ‘The relationship of trust has collapsed’. Angry voices at discharge of contaminated rainwater (in Japanese). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201502/CN2015022501001290.html
Lavelle, S., Dodidot, F., Rainey, S., Goujon, P., Kurt, A., Doquenoy, P., & Patrignani, N. (2011). EGAIS Deliverable 3.3: Portability of ethical governance. Paris: ICAM.
Mabon, L., & Kawabe, M. (2015). Fisheries in Iwaki after the Fukushima Dai’ichi nuclear accident: Lessons for coastal management under conditions of high uncertainty? Coastal Management, 43(5), 498–518.
Mabon, L., & Littlecott, C. (2015). Stakeholder perceptions. In Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (Ed.), CO 2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in the North Sea: Securing a low-carbon future for the UK (pp. 36–42). Edinburgh: Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage.
Mabon, L., & Shackley, S. (2015). More than meeting the targets? The ethical dimensions of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Environmental Values, 24, 465–482.
Mabon, L., Shackley, S., Blackford, J., Stahl, H., & Miller, A. (2015a). Local perceptions of the QICS experimental offshore CO2 release: Results from social science research. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 38, 18–25.
Mabon, L., Shackley, S., Vercelli, S., Anderlucci, J., & Boot, K. (2015b). Deliberative decarbonisation? Exploring a framework of ethical governance for low-carbon energy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 256–271.
Mabon, L., Shackley, S., & Bower-Bir, N. (2014). Perceptions of sub-seabed carbon dioxide storage in Scotland and implications for policy: A qualitative study. Marine Policy, 45, 9–15.
Melzer, L. S. (2012). Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR): Factors involved in adding carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) to enhanced oil recovery. Midland, TX: Melzer Consulting.
Miseruka Iwaki City. (2014). The story of the trial fisheries (in Japanese). http://misemasu-iwaki.jp/cm/index.html
Monastersky, R. (2013). Seabed scars raise questions over carbon-storage plan. Nature, 504, 339–340.
Morris-Suzuki, T. (2014). Touching the grass: Science, uncertainty and everyday life from Chernobyl to Fukushima. Science, Technology and Society, 19(3), 331–362.
National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2009). Best practices for: Public Outreach and education for carbon storage projects (1st ed.). Washington, DC: NETL, US Department of Energy.
National Geophysical Data Center. (2012, March 9). March 11 2011, Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. National Geophysical Data Center.
Pellizzoni, L. (2003). Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environmental Values, 12(2), 195–224.
Perrow, C. (2013). Nuclear denial. From Hiroshima to Fukushima. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69(5), 56–67.
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector. Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357.
Rainey, S., & Goujon, P. (2011). Toward a normative ethical governance of technology. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields (pp. 47–70). Brussels: European Union.
Riesch, H. (2012). Levels of uncertainty. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Essentials of risk theory (pp. 29–56). New York: Springer.
Rogers-Hayden, T., Mohr, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2007). Introduction: Engaging with nanotechnologies – engaging differently. NanoEthics, 1, 123–130.
Rooney, D., Leach, J., & Ashworth, P. (2014). Doing the social in social licence. Social Epistemology, 28(3–4), 209–218.
Scott, V., Haszeldine, R. S., Shackley, S., Gilfillan, S. M. V., Mabon, L., & Johnson, G. (2014). North Sea: Carbon dioxide storage is secure. Nature, 506, 34.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Towards a framework of responsible innovation: From concept to practice through an experiment at the UK research councils. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580.
Sunstein, C. (2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanaka, Y., Abe, M., Sawada, Y., Tanase, D., Ito, T., & Kasukawa, T. (2014). Tomakomai CCS demonstration project in Japan, 2014 update. Energy Procedia, 63, 6111–6119.
Terwel, B. W., ter Mors, E., & Daamen, D. D. L. (2012). It’s not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9, 41–51.
UmiLabo. (2015). Iwaki Sea research group UmiLabo (in Japanese). http://umilabo.hatenablog.com/
Vives i Batlle, J., Aono, T., Brown, J. E., Hosseini, A., Garnier-Laplace, J., Sazykina, T., Steenhuisen, F., & Strand, P. (2012). The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on marine biota: Retrospective assessment of the first year and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 487, 143–153.
von Schomberg, R. (2011). Introduction: Towards responsible research and innovation. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields (pp. 7–15). Brussels: European Union.
Wada, T., Nemoto, Y., Shimamura, S., Fujita, T., Mizuno, T., Sohtome, T., Kamiyama, K., Morita, T., & Igarashi, S. (2013). Effects of the nuclear disaster on marine products in Fukushima. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 124, 246–254.
Wakeford, R. (2011). And now, Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection, 31, 167–176.
Wynne, B. (1992a). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304.
Wynne, B. (1992b). Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventative paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111–127.
Yoshida, N., & Kanda, J. (2012). Tracking the Fukushima radionuclides. Science, 336, 1115–1116.
Zoback, M. D., & Goerlick, S. M. (2012). Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109(26), 10164–10168.
Acknowledgements
Section 12.3 synthesises findings from empirical research conducted as part of the European Union FP7 ECO2 and SiteChar projects, and from observations made of the NERC-funded QICS project. Sections 12.3 and 12.4 also draw in part on ideas developed and data collected during a Japan Foundation Fellowship. I am grateful to all participants in my research past and present for their insights, which have helped to shape the ideas in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mabon, L. (2017). Responsible Risk-Taking, or How Might CSR Be Responsive to the Nature of Contemporary Risks? Reflections on Sub-seabed Carbon Dioxide Storage in Scotland and Marine Radioactive Contamination in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. In: Vertigans, S., Idowu, S. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35083-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35083-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-35082-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-35083-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)