Skip to main content

Rethinking Secularization, Liberalism and Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pride and Authenticity
  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

My view of the Renaissance as an era inspired by the joy and pride of pursuing intrinsic goals, leading to the perfection and professionalization of action spheres such as science, commerce and art, implies a number of changes in the understanding of the modern age that the Renaissance started. Here I want to point to a consequence incompatible with the usual opposition of the secular and the religious. We can no longer understand secularization, which does characterize the modern age, as replacing religious values with liberal ones. We must understand it as the replacement of extrinsic with intrinsic goals. Secularization seems to oppose religion, but in fact it insists that religions pursue their specific intrinsic goal of providing meaning in life rather than mixing this goal with goals of power and science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cp. Steinvorth 2013, Part 1.

  2. 2.

    Cp. above Chap. 7 and Connolly 2014.

  3. 3.

    Mark 2:27, cp. Vattimo 1999, 88.

  4. 4.

    Matthew 6:28, cp. Luke 12:27.

  5. 5.

    Vattimo 1999, 50.

  6. 6.

    Norris 2000, at the beginning.

  7. 7.

    Weber’s relevant text is the Zwischenbetrachtung.

  8. 8.

    Cp. John Rawls 1985 and 1987.

  9. 9.

    Lilla 2007, 7f.

  10. 10.

    Lilla 2007, 309.

  11. 11.

    Lilla 2007, 7f.

  12. 12.

    Thus, Habermas 2012, 252, argues that in the secular state the political is still related to religion, if only “indirectly,” tacitly presuming, like Lilla, that as there are metaphysical elements in secular politics they are religious.

  13. 13.

    Ninian Smart 1996, understands religion more comprehensively so as to include atheistic metaphysics. Political theology, in contrast, is based on revelatory assumptions.

  14. 14.

    Chapter 3.

  15. 15.

    Lilla’s misunderstanding of sphere autonomy does not affect his convincing criticism that liberal theologians a century ago wanted to “intellectually” reconcile “the moral truths of biblical faith…with…the realities of modern political life.” Soaked in the “historical optimism about bourgeois life,” they were “too ashamed to proclaim the message found on every page of the Gospels, that you must change your life…And so, in the wake of the catastrophic First World War, liberal political theology was swept away.” The “liberal deity turned out to be a stillborn God, unable to inspire genuine conviction among those seeking ultimate truth” (2007, 301f).

  16. 16.

    Meier 2006, 25.

  17. 17.

    Meier 2006, 29f.

  18. 18.

    Cp. John Rawls 1985 and 1987.

  19. 19.

    Lilla 2007, 308.

  20. 20.

    Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic, 182; Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I, 204.

  21. 21.

    Cp. below Chap. 24.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinvorth, U. (2016). Rethinking Secularization, Liberalism and Religion. In: Pride and Authenticity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34117-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics