Abstract
The number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures continues to increase in United States, with over half a million performed each year [1] and an expectation that this number will increase by 600 % to three million a year by 2030 [2]. As the volume of TKA increases, hospitals and surgeons need to be able to perform these procedures with greater efficiency. These changes in efficiency must maintain or improve quality. Although the majority of TKA procedures are performed successfully, the risk of periprosthetic infections secondary to contamination of surgical instruments or the surgical field remains a concern to orthopedic surgeons. Although the risk of deep infection remains approximately 1 % in primary TKA [3], such complications are devastating in terms of the morbidity they cause patients. Furthermore, new legislation has determined that bacterial contamination is a “preventable” complication, requiring treatment that is not reimbursed [4]. Consequently, reimbursement rates are declining to both institutions and orthopedic surgeons, creating additional pressure on surgeons to provide operative care that must be increasingly efficient, yet less expensive. A novel approach aimed at decreasing the risk of contamination while improving efficiency involves disposable instruments, cutting blocks, and trials to perform TKA.
Images courtesy of: Smith & Nephew (Memphis, TN) and Dr. Peter Ritschl, Head of the Orthopedic Hospital Gersthof, Vienna.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.
Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):624–30.
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):45–51.
Siegel GW, Patel NN, Milshteyn MA, Buzas D, Lombardo DJ, Morawa LG. Cost Analysis and Surgical Site Infection Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Traditional vs. Single-Use Instrumentation. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2271–4.
Pasquarella C, Pitzurra O, Herren T, et al. Lack of influence of body exhaust gowns on aerobic bacterial surface counts in a mixed ventilation operating theatre. A study of 62 hip arthroplasties. J Hosp Infect. 2003;54:2–9.
Sanzen L, Carlsson AS, Walder M. Air contamination during total hip arthroplasty in an ultraclean air enclosure using different types of staff clothing. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:127–30.
Baykasoglu A, Dereli T, Yilankirkan N. Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: a case study. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:215–26.
Blom A, Estela C, Bowker K, et al. The passage of bacteria through surgical drapes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:405–7.
Waked WR, Simpson AK, Miller CP, et al. Sterilization wrap inspections do not adequately evaluate instrument sterility. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:207–11.
Bhadra AK, Kwiecien GJ, Harwin SF, Johnson AJ, Mont MA, Malkani AL. Procedure simplification: the role of single-use instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:326–30.
Bonutti P, Zywiel MG, Johnson A, Mont MA. The use of disposable cutting blocks and trials for primary total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg. 2010;9(4):249–55.
Dalstrom DJ, Venkatarayappa I, Manternach AL, Palcic MS, Heyse BA, Prayson MJ. Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1022–5.
Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Issa K, Pivec R, Blasser KE, McQueen D, Puri L, Dethmers DA, Miller DW, Ireland PH, Shurman JR, Bonutti P. Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and nonnavigated cases. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(4):285–90.
Mont MA, Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Issa K. Single-use cutting blocks and trials lower costs in primary total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:331–5.
Villamizar N, Pryor AD. SPIDER and flexible laparoscopy: the next frontier in abdominal surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:53–8.
Galinski M, Catineau J, Rayeh F, Muret J, Ciebiera JP, Plantevin F, Foucrier A, Tual L, Combes X, Adnet F. Laryngoscope plastic blades in scheduled general anesthesia patients: a comparative randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):107–12.
Mont MA, McElroy MJ, Johnson AJ, Pivec R, Single-Use Multicenter Trial Group Writing Group. Single-use instruments, cutting blocks, and trials increase efficiency in the operating room during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and non-navigated cases. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(7):1135–40.
Stiehl JB, Jackson S, Szabo A. Multi-factorial analysis of time efficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2009;14(1–3):58.
Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, et al. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:184.
Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2006;2(1):70–2.
Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, Arnout N, Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):263–71.
DeHaan AM, Adams JR, DeHart ML, Huff TW. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2065–9.
Yeo CH, Jariwala A, Pourgiezis N, Pillai A. Assessing the accuracy of bone resection by cutting blocks in patient-specific total knee replacements. ISRN Orthop. 2012;2012:509750.
Stall NM, Kagoma YM, Bondy JN, Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg. 2013;56(2):97–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Haas, S.B., Carli, A. (2016). Disposable Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_127
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine