Skip to main content

Disposable Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

Abstract

The number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures continues to increase in United States, with over half a million performed each year [1] and an expectation that this number will increase by 600 % to three million a year by 2030 [2]. As the volume of TKA increases, hospitals and surgeons need to be able to perform these procedures with greater efficiency. These changes in efficiency must maintain or improve quality. Although the majority of TKA procedures are performed successfully, the risk of periprosthetic infections secondary to contamination of surgical instruments or the surgical field remains a concern to orthopedic surgeons. Although the risk of deep infection remains approximately 1 % in primary TKA [3], such complications are devastating in terms of the morbidity they cause patients. Furthermore, new legislation has determined that bacterial contamination is a “preventable” complication, requiring treatment that is not reimbursed [4]. Consequently, reimbursement rates are declining to both institutions and orthopedic surgeons, creating additional pressure on surgeons to provide operative care that must be increasingly efficient, yet less expensive. A novel approach aimed at decreasing the risk of contamination while improving efficiency involves disposable instruments, cutting blocks, and trials to perform TKA.

Images courtesy of: Smith & Nephew (Memphis, TN) and Dr. Peter Ritschl, Head of the Orthopedic Hospital Gersthof, Vienna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):624–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel GW, Patel NN, Milshteyn MA, Buzas D, Lombardo DJ, Morawa LG. Cost Analysis and Surgical Site Infection Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Traditional vs. Single-Use Instrumentation. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2271–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pasquarella C, Pitzurra O, Herren T, et al. Lack of influence of body exhaust gowns on aerobic bacterial surface counts in a mixed ventilation operating theatre. A study of 62 hip arthroplasties. J Hosp Infect. 2003;54:2–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanzen L, Carlsson AS, Walder M. Air contamination during total hip arthroplasty in an ultraclean air enclosure using different types of staff clothing. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:127–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baykasoglu A, Dereli T, Yilankirkan N. Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: a case study. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:215–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blom A, Estela C, Bowker K, et al. The passage of bacteria through surgical drapes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:405–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Waked WR, Simpson AK, Miller CP, et al. Sterilization wrap inspections do not adequately evaluate instrument sterility. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhadra AK, Kwiecien GJ, Harwin SF, Johnson AJ, Mont MA, Malkani AL. Procedure simplification: the role of single-use instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:326–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonutti P, Zywiel MG, Johnson A, Mont MA. The use of disposable cutting blocks and trials for primary total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg. 2010;9(4):249–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalstrom DJ, Venkatarayappa I, Manternach AL, Palcic MS, Heyse BA, Prayson MJ. Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1022–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Issa K, Pivec R, Blasser KE, McQueen D, Puri L, Dethmers DA, Miller DW, Ireland PH, Shurman JR, Bonutti P. Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and nonnavigated cases. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(4):285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mont MA, Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Issa K. Single-use cutting blocks and trials lower costs in primary total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:331–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Villamizar N, Pryor AD. SPIDER and flexible laparoscopy: the next frontier in abdominal surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:53–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Galinski M, Catineau J, Rayeh F, Muret J, Ciebiera JP, Plantevin F, Foucrier A, Tual L, Combes X, Adnet F. Laryngoscope plastic blades in scheduled general anesthesia patients: a comparative randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mont MA, McElroy MJ, Johnson AJ, Pivec R, Single-Use Multicenter Trial Group Writing Group. Single-use instruments, cutting blocks, and trials increase efficiency in the operating room during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and non-navigated cases. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(7):1135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stiehl JB, Jackson S, Szabo A. Multi-factorial analysis of time efficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2009;14(1–3):58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, et al. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2006;2(1):70–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, Arnout N, Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DeHaan AM, Adams JR, DeHart ML, Huff TW. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2065–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeo CH, Jariwala A, Pourgiezis N, Pillai A. Assessing the accuracy of bone resection by cutting blocks in patient-specific total knee replacements. ISRN Orthop. 2012;2012:509750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Stall NM, Kagoma YM, Bondy JN, Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg. 2013;56(2):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven B. Haas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Haas, S.B., Carli, A. (2016). Disposable Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_127

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_127

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics