Abstract
Improvements in surgical techniques and technologies have increased the accuracy and precision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical guides, computer-assisted navigation, and robotic surgery have all been developed to increase component accuracy and alignment. Accelerometer- and gyroscope-based instruments are a technologic advance that has improved the reproducibility and accuracy of component placement that can easily be implemented into the surgical procedure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop. 2010;468:57–63. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 ;404:7–13.
De Steiger RN, Liu Y-L, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:635–42. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01496.
Huang EH, Copp SN, Bugbee WD. Accuracy of A handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.055.
Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:132–8. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.009.
Hohmann E, Tetsworth K. Do manual cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty introduce systematic error? Int Orthop. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2963-8.
Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097–106. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001.
MacDessi SJ, Jang B, Harris IA, Wheatley E, Bryant C, Chen DB. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21:406–9. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2013.11.004.
Cip J, Widemschek M, Luegmair M, Sheinkop MB, Benesch T, Martin A. Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1795–802. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.037.
Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:261–9. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00601.
Scuderi GR, Fallaha M, Masse V, Lavigne P, Amiot L-P, Berthiaume M-J. Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin N Am. 2014;45:167–73. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2013.11.002.
Berend KR, Lombardi AV. Liberal indications for minimally invasive oxford unicondylar arthroplasty provide rapid functional recovery and pain relief. Surg Technol Int. 2007;16:193–7.
Nam D, Jerabek SA, Cross MB, Mayman DJ. Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg Off J Int Soc Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17:205–10. doi:10.3109/10929088.2012.689335.
Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:288–94. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.006.
Bugbee WD, Kermanshahi AY, Munro MM, McCauley JC, Copp SN. Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21:1225–8. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.09.006.
Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80:850–8.
Pradhan NR, Gambhir A, Porter ML. Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: a study of eight different implant designs. Knee. 2006;13:7–11. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2005.06.004.
Chen JY, Chin PL, Tay DKJ, Chia S-L, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Functional outcome and quality of life after patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1724–8. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.007.
Goyal N, Patel AR, Yaffe MA, Luo MY, Stulberg SD. Does implant design influence the accuracy of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1526–30. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.019.
Goh GS-H, Liow MHL, Lim WS-R, Tay DK-J, Yeo SJ, Tan MH. Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched study. J Arthroplasty. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.048.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mayman, D.J., Carroll, K.M. (2016). Use of Gyroscope-Based Instruments in TKA. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_119
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_119
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine