Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Spinal Deformity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

Abstract

There has been a rapid evolution in the operative management of spinal deformity during the past century. While much has changed in the surgical theater, the goals of treatment have remained the same: to achieve balanced curve correction, obtain solid arthrodesis, prevent future deformity, improve and/or prevent back pain, and avoid cardiopulmonary compromise [1]. In the first half of the twentieth century, the standard of care was posterior arthrodesis followed by prolonged bed rest and casting [2]. In the late 1950s, Harrington introduced instrumentation to achieve improved curve correction, lower pseudarthrosis rates, and allow early patient mobilization. Harrington utilized a nonsegmental system to distract across the concave side of a curvature and, in doing so, elongated the spine [3]. The coronal plane correction achieved was desirable, but the sagittal plane distraction forces resulted in a loss of lumbar lordosis and flat back syndrome in many patients [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hibbs RA, Risser JC, Ferguson AB. Scoliosis treated by the fusion operation: an end-result study of three hundred and sixty cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1931;13:91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cobb J. Spine arthrodesis in the treatment of scoliosis. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1958;29:187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrington P. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1962;44:591–610.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridwell K. Spinal instrumentation in the management of adolescent scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:64–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luque E. Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:192–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. A new technique for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984;70(6):489–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suk S, Lee C, Jeong S. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20:1399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodgson A, Stock F. Anterior fusion for the treatment of tuberculosis of the spine: the operative findings and results of treatment in the first on hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1960;42:295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dwyer A, Newton N, Sherwood A. An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;62:192–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lonner B. Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zielke K, Pellin B. New instruments and implants for supplementation of Harrington system. Z Orthop Ihre Grengeb. 1976;114:5347–59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe T, Peters J. Anterior spinal fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: a frontal and sagittal curve analysis in 36 patients. Spine. 1993;18:423–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of Kaneda two rod system. Spine. 1996;22:1358–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein R, Hall J. Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;7:124–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mack M, Regan J, Bobechko W, et al. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the sine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newton P, Shea K, Granlund K. Defining the pediatric spinal thoracoscopy learning curve: sixty five consecutive cases. Spine. 2000;25:1028–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herkowitz H. Rothman-Simeone the spine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vedantam R, Lenke L, Bridwell K, et al. A prospective evaluation of pulmonary function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical approach used for spinal arthrodesis. Spine. 2000;25:82–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landreneau R, Hazelrigg S, Mack M. Postoperative pain related morbidity: video assisted thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:1285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Newton P, Marks M, Faro F, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2003;28(20):S249–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Sayyad M, Crawford A, Wolf R. Early experience with video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: our first 70 cases. Spine. 2004;29(17):1945–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenke L, Betz R, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83:1169–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Betz R, Shufflebarger H. Anterior versus posterior instrumentation for the correction of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2001;26:1095–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lonner B, Kondrachor D, Siddiqi F, et al. Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88:1022–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wall E, Bylski-Austrow D, Shelton F, et al. Endoscopic discectomy increases thoracic spine flexibility as effectively as open discectomy: a mechanical study in a porcine model. Spine. 1998;23:9–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher M, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with thoracic pedicle screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91:398–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Newton P, Cardelia J, Farnsworth C, et al. A biomechanical comparison of thoracoscopic and open anterior spinal release in a goat model. Spine. 1998;23(5):530–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lonstein J, Carlson J. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic curve progression during growth. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;66:1061–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Allington N, Bowen J. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment with the Wilmington brace: a comparison of full time and part time use. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:1056–62.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clayson D, Luz-Alterman S, Cataletto M, et al. Long term psychological sequelae of surgically versus nonsurgically treated scoliosis. Spine. 1987;12:983–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Noonan K, Dolan L, Jacobson W, et al. Long term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:712–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nachemson A, Peterson L. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77:815–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Braun J, Akyuz E, Udall H, et al. Three dimensional analysis of 2 fusionless scoliosis treatments: a flexible ligament tether versus a rigid shape memory alloy staple. Spine. 2006;31(3):262–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith A, Von Lakum H, Wylie R. An operation for stapling vertebral bodies in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1954;36A:342–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Betz R, Kim J, D’Andrea LP, et al. An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety and utility study. Spine. 2003;28(205):S255–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson G, Lenke L, Akbarnia B, et al. Early onset scoliosis: future directions. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89A:163–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sucato D, Girgis M. Bilateral pneumothoraces, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum and subcutaneous emphysema following intubation with a double lumen endotracheal tube for thoracoscopic anterior spinal release and fusion in a patient with idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15(2):133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perez-Cruet M, Fessler R, Perin N. Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(2):S26–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dieter R, Kuzycz G. Complications and contraindications of thoracoscopy. Int Surg. 1997;82:232–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sucato D, Elerson E. A comparison of the prone and lateral position for performing a thoracoscopic anterior release and fusion for pediatric spinal deformity. Spine. 2003;28(18):2176–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hasharino A, Errico T, Lonner B, et al. Mini open thoracotomy, thoracoscopically assisted, for anterior thoracic spine release. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(Suppl III):297–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baron S. Lonner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Zarro, C.M., Lonner, B.S. (2016). Minimally Invasive Treatment of Spinal Deformity. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_108

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics