Skip to main content

Adaptive Logistic Regression Modeling of Multivariate Dichotomous and Polytomous Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Regression for Modeling Nonlinear Relationships

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

  • 2104 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter formulates and demonstrates adaptive fractional polynomial modeling of means and dispersions for repeatedly measured dichotomous and polytomous outcomes with two or more values. Marginal modeling extends from the multivariate normal outcome context to the multivariate dichotomous and polytomous outcome context. However, due to the complexity in general of computing likelihoods and quasi-likelihoods (as needed to account for non-unit dispersions) for general multivariate marginal modeling, generalized estimating equations (GEE) techniques are often used instead, thereby avoiding computation of likelihoods and quasi-likelihoods. This complicates the extension of adaptive modeling to the GEE context since it is based on cross-validation (CV) scores computed from likelihoods or likelihood-like functions, but a readily computed extended likelihood is formulated for use in adaptive GEE-based modeling of multivariate dichotomous and polytomous outcomes. Conditional modeling also extends to the multivariate dichotomous and polytomous outcome context, both transition modeling and general conditional modeling. In contrast to marginal GEE-based modeling, conditional modeling of means for multivariate dichotomous and polytomous outcomes with unit dispersions is based on pseudolikelihoods that can be used to compute pseudolikelihood CV (PLCV) scores on which to base adaptive transition and general conditional modeling of multivariate dichotomous and polytomous outcomes. These marginal and conditional models can be extended to model dispersions as well as means. Example analyses of these kinds are presented of post-baseline respiratory status over time for patients with respiratory disorder in terms of the baseline respiratory status, time, and being on an active as opposed to a placebo treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chaganty, N. R. (1997). An alternative approach to the analysis of longitudinal data via generalized estimating equations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 63, 39–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011). Applied longitudinal analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, G. G., Carr, C. F., Amara, I. A., Stokes, M. E., & Uryniak, T. J. (1989). Categorical data analysis. In D. A. Berry (Ed.), Statistical methodology in the pharmaceutical sciences (pp. 391–475). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, S. R., Kim, K., & Zhao, L. (1994). Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1149–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1999). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Landis, J. R. (1993). The analysis of longitudinal polytomous generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares. Biometrics, 49, 1033–1044.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. (2006). Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W. (2001). Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57, 120–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Koch, G. G. (2012). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system (3rd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knafl, G.J., Ding, K. (2016). Adaptive Logistic Regression Modeling of Multivariate Dichotomous and Polytomous Outcomes. In: Adaptive Regression for Modeling Nonlinear Relationships. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33946-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics