Skip to main content

Abstract

Humans are prewired to experience internal tension and conflict. Being the complex beings we are, we often find ourselves overtaken with emotions, thoughts, desires, and urges, each pulling and pushing us in different directions. To move from internal disarray to actionable behavior, and conduct our lives with some purpose and perhaps a flicker of grace, we need to make a never-ending stream of decisions. These decisions govern every aspect of our lives, whether small or large, mundane or life changing, at home or at work. In fact, one could say that the person you are at this very moment, and the precise circumstances of your life are the sum total of all the decisions you have made to date. In other words, we are the sum of our decisions. Therefore, how well we make these decisions, matters. How deeply we understand what we really want, how wisely we choose, and how astutely we expand our options, profoundly affects the quality of our lives and consequently the lives of those around us. In this chapter, I will offer a novel approach by which to better understand our dilemmas and inner conflicts, and present a four-step method that is designed to guide people towards a mindful decision making process that effectively resolves dilemmas in a way that supports well-being and flourishing.

The self is by definition always a complexio oppositorum [collection of opposites] (Jung, 1970, p. 716)

Dumbeldoor: It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. (J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that NSM is designed to address and resolve conflicts that originate from tangible real-life situations, and not general or philosophical conflicts, such as a conflict between ‘work and family’, or between ‘security and self-fulfillment’.

  2. 2.

    It is also possible to define the conflict in “for” and “for” terms. For instance, “for quitting my job as paramedic” and “for continuing my job as a paramedic”.

References

  • Burton, J. W. (1984). Global conflict: The domestic sources of international crisis. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2000). Justice and conflict. In M. Deutch & P. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 41–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1942). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id – The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and monotheism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16(2), 89–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11(1), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., Rijks, T. I., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). Imaginal dialogues in the self: Theory and method. Journal of Personality, 61(2), 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and cognition, 28, 64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1970). Collected works of CG Jung: Psychology and religion: West and East (Vol. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (1999). Negotiation (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierenberg, G. I. (1968). The art of negotiating: Psychological strategies for gaining advantageous bargains. New York: Hawthorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, D. (2009). The negotiational self: Identifying and transforming negotiation outcomes within the self. Ph.D. thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, D. (2012). Voicing inner conflict: From a dialogical to a negotiational self. Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, D. & Kluger, A. N. (under review). Making decisions that make us happy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. L. (2001). The mind and heart of the negotiator (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychology Bulletin, 124(3), 333–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubek, J. M., Pruitt, D. G., Peirce, R. S., McGillicuddy, N. B., & Syna, H. (1992). Disputant and mediator behaviors affecting short-term success in mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36, 546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina Nir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nir, D. (2016). Becoming the Leader of Your Decisions. In: Hermans, H. (eds) Assessing and Stimulating a Dialogical Self in Groups, Teams, Cultures, and Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32482-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics