Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cohort Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials in Childhood Hypertension

Pediatric Hypertension

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical research involving children with hypertension poses unique opportunities and challenges. In particular, the complications of hypertension accrue over the course of many years and are relatively infrequent, so studies need to be large and long term to identify clinically important end points. Despite the challenges, an evidence base is beginning to amass that should eventually answer many of the relevant questions. We now have a good idea of how blood pressure tracks from the beginnings of life to early adulthood and an understanding of the relative importance of different risk factors. This chapter aims to inform the reader of different study designs as they apply to pediatric hypertension, and how these can be applied to answer specific questions of clinical importance. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different study designs, and the results of some particularly impactful trials are discussed. Recent advances in study design and epidemiology are covered, with a focus on the potential role of data sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman DG (2000) Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends. Stat Med 19:3275–3289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B et al (1992) A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 268:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badve SV, Palmer SC, Strippoli GFM, et al (2016) The validity of left ventricular mass as a surrogate end point for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality outcomes in people with CKD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 68:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao W, Threefoot SA, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS (1995) Essential hypertension predicted by tracking of elevated blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: the Bogalusa heart study. Am J Hypertens 8:657–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DE, Bero L (1998) Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 279:1566–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begley CG, Ellis LM (2012) Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483:531–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhurke S, Cook A, Tallant A et al (2015) Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I (2016) A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med 374:2411–2413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P (2006) Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ 332:1089–1092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I (2005) Academia’s failure to support systematic reviews. Lancet 365:469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B et al (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan A-W, Song F, Vickers A et al (2014) Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 383:257–266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Li S et al (2007) Clustering of long-term trends in metabolic syndrome variables from childhood to adulthood in Blacks and Whites: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 166:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiolero A, Bovet P, Paradis G (2013) Screening for elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents: a critical appraisal. JAMA Pediatr 167:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciani O, Buyse M, Garside R et al (2013) Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological. BMJ 457:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I (2010) Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet 376:20–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S et al (2010) Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 341:c3920

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley P (2000) Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst (2):CD000065

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey C, Aiken AM, Hayes RJ, Hargreaves JR (2015) Re-analysis of health and educational impacts of a school-based deworming programme in western Kenya: a statistical replication of a cluster quasi-randomized stepped-wedge trial. Int J Epidemiol 44:1581–1592

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, Ravaud P (2013) Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 346:f2304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dickersin K (2012) The evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterprise. JAMA 307:1861–1864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Din-Dzietham R, Liu Y, Bielo MV, Shamsa F (2007) High blood pressure trends in children and adolescents in national surveys, 1963 to 2002. Circulation 116:1488–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doshi P (2015) No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility. BMJ 4629:h4629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer T, Sun C, Magnussen CG et al (2013) Cohort profile: the international childhood cardiovascular cohort (i3c) consortium. Int J Epidemiol 42:86–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim S, Sohani ZN, Montoya L et al (2014) Reanalyses of randomized clinical trial data. JAMA 312:1024–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein EL, Collins R, Cracknell BS et al (2008) Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs. Clin Trials 5:75–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ (2000) What make clinical research ethical? JAMA 283:2701–2711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli D (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 4:e5738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P (2002) Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 325:652–654

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH (2011) Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixler DE, Laird WP (1983) Validity of mass blood pressure screening in children. Pediatrics 72:459–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontanarosa PB, Rennie D, DeAngelis CD (2004) Postmarketing surveillance – lack of vigilance, lack of trust. JAMA 292:2647–2650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2012) False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol 120:920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haug CJ (2016) From patient to patient — sharing the data from clinical trials. N Engl J Med 374:2409–2411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RC, Burrows S, Mori TA et al (2015) Life course adiposity and blood pressure between birth and 17 years old. Am J Hypertens 28:1056–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Impicciatore P, Choonara I, Clarkson A et al (2001) Incidence of adverse drug reactions in paediatric in/out-patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52:77–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of medicine (2015) Sharing clinical trial data. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP et al (2000) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ 320:537–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson T, Doshi P (2014) Multisystem failure: the story of anti-influenza drugs. BMJ 348:g2263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CL, Paulose-Ram R, Ogden CL et al (2013) National health and nutrition examination survey: analytic guidelines, 1999–2010. Vital Health Stat 2:1999–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen AW, Hilden J, Gøtzsche PC (2006) Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. BMJ 333:782

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Juhola J, Magnussen CG, Viikari JS et al (2011) Tracking of serum lipid levels, blood pressure, and body mass index from childhood to adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young finns study. J Pediatr 159:584–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juhola J, Magnussen CG, Berenson GS et al (2013) Combined effects of child and adult elevated blood pressure on subclinical atherosclerosis: the international childhood cardiovascular cohort consortium. Circulation 128(3):217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagura J, Adair LS, Musa MG et al (2015) Blood pressure tracking in urban black South African children: birth to twenty cohort. BMC Pediatr 15:78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Prasad V (2015) Cancer drugs approved on the basis of a surrogate end point and subsequent overall survival. JAMA 175:1992–1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C (2001) Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 135:982–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N et al (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333:597–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer RM, Clarke WR (1989) Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 84:633–641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Noury J, Nardo JM, Healy D et al (2015) Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence. BMJ 351:h4320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leeflang MMG, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB et al (2013) Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. Can Med Assoc J 185:E537–E544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy PS, Lemeshow S (2008) Sampling of populations. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Little RJ, D’Agostino R, Cohen ML et al (2012) The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 367:1355–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lo T, Malaga-Dieguez L, Trachtman H (2014) U.S. preventive services task force recommendation and pediatric hypertension screening: dereliction of duty or call to arms? J Clin Hypertens 16:342–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurbe E, Agabiti-Rosei E, Cruickshank JK et al (2016) 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Hypertens 34:1887–1920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R (2005) Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merson L, Gaye O, Guerin PJ (2016) Avoiding data dumpsters — toward equitable and useful data sharing. N Engl J Med 374:2414–2415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller H (1973) Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey: United States-1971-1973. DHEW publication no (PHS)-Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC et al (2007) Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 4:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer VA, USPSTF (2014) Screening for primary hypertension in children and adolescents: U.S. preventative services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160:613–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletcher MJ, Lo B, Grady D (2014) Informed consent in randomized quality improvement trials: a critical barrier for learning health systems. JAMA Intern Med 174:668–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porta N, Bonet C, Cobo E (2007) Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 60:663–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyörälä K, Salonen JT, Valkonen T (1985) Trends in coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity and related factors in Finland. Cardiology 72:35–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher ER, Jacobs DR, Moran A et al (2009) Relation of blood pressure and body mass index during childhood to cardiovascular risk factor levels in young adults. J Hypertens 27:1766–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Rönnemaa T et al (2008) Cohort profile: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Int J Epidemiol 37:1220–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J et al (2014) Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people. Lancet 383:1899–1911

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma JB, Rutjes AWS, Khan KS et al (2009) A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. J Clin Epidemiol 62:797–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner B, Cook NR, Daniels S, Falkner B (2013) Childhood blood pressure trends and risk factors for high blood pressure: the NHANES experience 1988-2008. Hypertension 62:247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saha C, Jones MP (2009) Bias in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout. J Stat Plan Inference 139:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels J, Bell C, Flynn JT (2013) Screening children for high blood pressure: where the US preventive services task force went wrong. J Clin Hypertens 15:526–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz KF (1995) Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA 274:1456–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2005) Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. Lancet 365:1591–1595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shear CL, Burke GL, Freedman DS, Berenson GS (1986) Value of childhood blood pressure measurements and family history in predicting future blood pressure status: results from 8 years of follow-up in the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics 77:862–869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A et al (2010) Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 8:24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Staa TP, Goldacre B, Gulliford M et al (2012) Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the test. BMJ 344:e55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stergiou GS, Nasothimiou E, Giovas P et al (2008) Diagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents based on home versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 26:1556–1562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streptomycin in Tuberculosis Trials Committee (1948) Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ 2:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun SS, Grave GD, Siervogel RM et al (2007) Systolic blood pressure in childhood predicts hypertension and metabolic syndrome later in life. Pediatrics 119:237–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson S (2016) Surrogate outcomes in clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med, 173:611–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Taichman DB, Backus J, Baethge C et al (2016) Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the international committee of medical journal editors. PLoS Med 13:e1001950

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Theodore RF, Broadbent J, Nagin D et al (2015) Childhood to early-midlife systolic blood pressure trajectories. Hypertension 66:1108–1115

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M (2014) Gaps in the evidence for screening children for hypertension to prevent adult cardiovascular disease-response to the editorial by Samuels and Colleagues. J Clin Hypertens 16:80–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M, Dana T, Bougatsos C et al (2013) Screening for hypertension in children and adolescents to prevent cardiovascular disease. Pediatrics 131:490–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong A, Samuel S, Zappitelli M et al (2016) Standardised outcomes in nephrology—children and adolescents (SONG-Kids): a protocol for establishing a core outcome set for children with chronic kidney disease. Trials 17:401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. New Eng J Med 358:252–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urbina EM, De Ferranti S, Steinberger J (2014) Observational studies may be more important than randomized clinical trials: weaknesses in us preventive services task force recommendation on blood pressure screening in youth. Hypertension 63:638–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Spall HGC, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA (2007) Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals. JAMA 297:1233–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voors AW, Foster TA, Frerichs RR et al (1976) Studies of blood pressures in children, ages 5-14 years, in a total biracial community: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation 54:319–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al (2012) The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from http//www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 10 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: research and reporting methods accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S (2013) A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 66:1093–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woertman W, de Hoop E, Moerbeek M et al (2013) Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 66:752–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AM, White IR, Thompson SG (2004) Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clin Trials 1:368–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wühl E, Trivelli A, Picca S et al (2009) Strict blood-pressure control and progression of renal failure in children. N Engl J Med 361:1639–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, et al (2011) The ClinicalTrials.gov results database — update and key issues. N Engl J Med 364:852–860

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Nicholas Larkins MBBS & Jonathan Craig PhD

Authors
  1. Nicholas Larkins MBBS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan Craig PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Larkins MBBS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Joseph Flynn

  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Julie R. Ingelfinger

  3. Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas Medical Science, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

    Karen Redwine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Larkins, N., Craig, J. (2016). Cohort Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials in Childhood Hypertension. In: Flynn, J., Ingelfinger, J., Redwine, K. (eds) Pediatric Hypertension. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31420-4_54-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31420-4_54-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31420-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31420-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Cohort Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials in Childhood Hypertension
    Published:
    17 March 2022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31420-4_54-2

  2. Original

    Cohort Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials in Childhood Hypertension
    Published:
    23 December 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31420-4_54-1

Search

Navigation