Skip to main content

Policy Initiatives That Steer Terrorism: A Case Study of L. Paul Bremer’s De-Ba’athification of the Iraqi Army

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eradicating Terrorism from the Middle East

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 17))

  • 969 Accesses

Abstract

A key objective of the U.S. invasion of Iraq was to bring democracy to Iraq by severing all links with Saddam Hussein’s toppled regime. As we’ve now discovered however, this “de-Ba’athization” policy was terribly shortsighted and led to horrific sectarian fighting in Iraq, attacks on U.S. troops when they were occupying the country, and eventually the rise of ISIS and other terrorist groups that are wreaking havoc on the region today. We will delve into the complicated political, ethnic, and religious dynamics that exist in Iraq to examine why, rather than leading to peace, the dismantling of the Ba’ath infrastructure instead unleashed instability on the Iraqi people soon followed by utter chaos and incalculable suffering for the population of Iraq (and even outside its borders) that continues to this day. We all know the famous Santayana quote that those who fail to learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. The question is do we have the political will and wherewithal to put that wise advice to practical use in our current and future foreign policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Author’s Note: Sectarian intimidation is explained as an act, usually violent in nature, that is committed against another religious or ethnic sect for the sole purpose of inciting brutal actions against the opposing group. This intentionally perpetuates a nonstop cycle of attacks and retaliation, making peaceful solutions or compromises increasingly difficult to achieve.

References

  • Al‐Marashi I (2013) Iraq’s security outlook for 2013. Italian Institute for International Political Studies, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhe JM (2009) Imposing democracy: state building and the war on terror. State University New York, Geneseo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnebusch R (2007) The American invasion of Iraq: causes and consequences. Perceptions 12(1):9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D, Massoud TG (2009) Anatomy of failure: Bush’s decision-making process and the Iraq war. Foreign Policy Anal 5(3):265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel R (2012) The De-Baathification of Iraq: the development and implementation of an ostensibly necessary vetting policy that turned into a tool of sectarianism. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner JP (2008) Policy making in the Bush White House. Governance Studies at Brookings, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner JP (2010) US blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and disbanding the army. Intelligence National Security 25:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathmell A (2005) Planning post-conflict reconstruction in Iraq: what can we learn? Int Aff 81:1013–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth K (2004) War in Iraq: not a humanitarian intervention. Human Rights Watch, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover E, Megally H, Mufti H (2005) Bremer’s gordian knot: transitional justice and the US occupation of Iraq. Human Rights Q 27:830–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson D (2013) Iraq war among world’s worst events: ever more shocked, never yet awed. David Swanson, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrill WA (2012) Lessons of the Iraqi De-Ba’athification program for Iraq’s future and the Arab revolutions. Army War College—Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle Barracks

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer C (2007) The Iraq debacle: the rise and fall of procurement-aided unilateralism as a paradigm of foreign war. J Int Law 29:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler RS (2009) Eliminating success during eclipse II: an examination of the decision to disband the Iraqi military. United States Marine Corps Command and Staff College, Marine Corps, Quantico

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali G. Awadi Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awadi, A.G. (2016). Policy Initiatives That Steer Terrorism: A Case Study of L. Paul Bremer’s De-Ba’athification of the Iraqi Army. In: Dawoody, A. (eds) Eradicating Terrorism from the Middle East. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31018-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics