Skip to main content

Against Patriotism and National Partiality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Patriotism
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

Commonsense, widespread moral opinion affirms patriotism as a moral requirement binding on all members of nation-states and national communities. This chapter argues against this consensus. The duty of patriotism for purposes of this discussion is understood as the moral duty of each person to be partial in promoting the national project of her own national community and in favoring specially the interests of conationals over those of outsiders. The chapter argues against the claim that there is any such duty by rebutting arguments offered to support this claim. The uncertain bearing of doctrines of cosmopolitanism on the case for these duties of patriotic partiality is briefly explored. The chapter ends by considering whether duties of patriotic/national partiality might find their place, justified by instrumental considerations, as subordinate elements in a multilevel moral system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abizadeh A (2007) Cooperation, pervasive impact and coercion: on the scope (not site) of distributive justice. Philos Public Aff 35:318–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson R (2003) Consequentialism versus special-ties partiality. Monist 86:382–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson R (2016) Extreme cosmopolitanisms defended. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 19:555–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson R (2019) Consequentialism and its critics. In: Becker C, Thomson I (eds) The Cambridge history of philosophy 1945–2015. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 249–263

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blake M (2001) Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philos Public Aff 30:257–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock G (ed) (2013) Cosmopolitanism versus non-cosmopolitanism: critiques, defenses, reconceptualizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney S (2005) Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Sabel C (2006) Extra rempublicam nulla justitia? Philos Public Aff 34:147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Chapter 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster E (1951) What I believe. In: Forster E (ed) Two cheers for democracy. Harvest Book, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomberg P (1990) Patriotism is like racism. Ethics 101:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin R (1988) What is so special about our fellow countrymen? Ethics 98:663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare R (1981) Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Chapter 3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurka T (1997) The justification of national partiality. In: McKim R, McMahan J (eds) The morality of nationalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius A (2006) Nagel’s atlas. Philos Public Aff 34:176–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller S (2005) Patriotism as bad faith. Ethics 115:563–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleingeld P (2000) Kantian patriotism. Philos Public Aff 29:313–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre M (1984) Is patriotism a virtue? Lindley lecture. University of Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1995) On nationality. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R (1998) Cosmopolitan respect and patriotic concern. Philos Public Aff 27:202–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (2007) Cosmopolitanism, global egalitarianism. In: National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 23–50, 51–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R (2010) Globalizing justice: the ethics of poverty and power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (2013) Political philosophy for earthlings, justice and boundaries, and social justice versus global justice. In: Miller D (ed) Justice for earthlings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 16–39, 142–164, and 165–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Moellendorf D (2009) Global inequality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1986) The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (2005) The problem of global justice. Philos Public Aff 33:113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (1996) Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. In: Cohen J (ed) For love of country. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenquist A (1982) Loyalties. J Philos 79:173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (2002) World poverty and human rights. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz I (2015) Patriotism: a two-tier account. In: Kleinig J, Keller S, Primoratz I (eds) The ethics of patriotism: a debate. Wiley, Chichester, pp 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton P (1984) Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philos Public Aff 13:134–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse M (2012a) On global justice. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risse M (2012b) Global political philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sangiovanni A (2007) Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philos Public Aff 35:3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (1982) The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (2001) Boundaries and allegiances. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Chapters 6 and 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (2010) Equality and tradition. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford. Chapter 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (2018) Membership and political obligation. J Polit Philos 26:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1982) Rights and agency. Philos Public Aff 11:3–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AJ (1996) Associative political obligations. Ethics 106:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K-S (2004) Justice without borders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treuer D (2019) The heartbeat of Wounded Knee: native America from 1890 to the present. Penguin Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentini L (2011) Justice in a globalized world: a normative framework. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2012) Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Arneson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Arneson, R. (2020). Against Patriotism and National Partiality. In: Sardoc, M. (eds) Handbook of Patriotism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_56-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_56-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30534-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30534-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics