Skip to main content

Decision Support System for Implementing Data Quality Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management Technologies and Applications (DATA 2015)

Abstract

The new data-oriented shape of organizations inevitably imposes the need for the improvement of their data quality (DQ). In fact, growing data quality initiatives are offering increased monetary and non-monetary benefits for organizations. These benefits include increased customer satisfaction, reduced operating costs and increased revenues. However, regardless of the numerous initiatives, there is still no globally accepted approach for evaluating data quality projects in order to build the optimal business cases taking into account the benefits and the costs. This paper presents a model to clearly identify the opportunities for increased monetary and non-monetary benefits from improved data quality within an Enterprise Architecture context. The aim of this paper is to measure, in a quantitative manner, how key business processes help to execute an organization’s strategy and then to qualify the benefits as well as the complexity of improving data, that are consumed and produced by these processes. These findings will allow to select data quality improvement projects, based on the latter’s benefits to the organization and their costs of implementation. To facilitate the understanding of this approach, a Java EE Web application is developed and presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.domaines.gov.ma/.

References

  1. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Eppler, M., Helfert, M.: A classification and analysis of data quality costs. In: International Conference on Information Quality, pp. 311–325 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haug, A., Zachariassen, F., Van Liempd, D.: The costs of poor data quality. J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 4(2), 168–193 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Otto, B., Hüner, K. M., Österle, H.: Identification of business oriented data quality metrics. In: ICIQ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gartner.: measuring the business value of data quality (2011). https://www.data.com/export/sites/data/common/assets/pdf/DS_Gartner.pdf

  6. International Association for Information and Data Quality (2015). http://iaidq.org/main/glossary.shtml

  7. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data quality assessment. Commun. ACM 45(4), 211–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aladwani, A.M., Palvia, P.C.: Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Inf. Manage. 39(6), 467–476 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Batini, C., Comerio, M., Viscusi, G.: Managing quality of large set of conceptual schemas in public administration: methods and experiences. In: Abelló, A., Bellatreche, L., Benatallah, B. (eds.) MEDI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7602, pp. 31–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Scannapieco, M., Catarci, T.: Data quality under a computer science perspective. Arch. Comput. 2, 1–15 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Närman, P., Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M., Chenine, M., König, J.: Enterprise architecture analysis for data accuracy assessments. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Belhiah, M., Bounabat, B., Achchab, S.: The impact of data accuracy on user-perceived business service’s quality. In: 10th Iberian IEEE Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bovee, M., Srivastava, R.P., Mak, B.: A conceptual framework and belief function approach to assessing overall information quality. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18(1), 51–74 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Naumann, F.: Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems. LNCS, vol. 2261. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. English, L.P.: Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality: Methods for Reducing Costs and Increasing Profits. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Office of Inspector General/United States Postal Office. Audit report: Undeliverable as Addressed Mail. MS-AR-14-006 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. NIST/SEMATECH. E-Handbook of statistical methods (2013). http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meryam Belhiah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Belhiah, M., Benqatla, M.S., Bounabat, B. (2016). Decision Support System for Implementing Data Quality Projects. In: Helfert, M., Holzinger, A., Belo, O., Francalanci, C. (eds) Data Management Technologies and Applications. DATA 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 584. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30162-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30162-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30161-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30162-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics