Abstract
Although the incidence of low back pain is about 60 %, that of low back pain plus sciatica is only 1 %. Sciatica is most commonly due to herniation of a lumbar intervertebral disc. L4–L5 is the most frequently involved level, followed closely by L5-S1 and then L3–L4. Disc protrusion at other levels or at more than one level at any given time is rare. Other potential causes of sciatica include spondylosis, infection, neoplasm, and vascular disease. There is some controversy about the usefulness of surgery or nonoperative treatment in managing these patients. The majority of patients with lumbar disc herniations and sciatica will improve with conservative treatment and time. The natural history of lumbar disc herniations is very favorable. At times, there was a tendency, however, to operate on these patients a few weeks after the onset of their initial symptoms, especially when minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques could be offered. Some surgical techniques have become so minimally invasive (microendoscopic discectomy), allowing their performance on an ambulatory basis. It is our task, as consulted spine surgeons, to return a patient with sciatica in a prompt and effective manner to his or her previous level of function as soon as possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Smith M, Foley K (1998) Microendoscopic discectomy (MED): the first one hundred cases. Neurosurgery 43:702
Mouw L, Hitchon P (1996) Pathogenesis and natural history of degenerative disc and spinal disease. In: Tindall G, Cooper P, Barrows D (eds) The practice of neurosurgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 2357–2366
Dowd G, Rusich G, Connolly E (1998) Herniated lumbar disc evaluation and management. Neurosurgery 8:140–160
Saal JA (1996) Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2S–9S
Chau AM, Xu LL, Pelzer NR, Gragnaniello C (2014) Timing of surgical intervention in cauda equina syndrome: a systematic critical review. World Neurosurg 81:640–650
Hakelius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica. A clinical follow-up of surgical and non-surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 129:1–76
Long D, Filtzer D, BenDebba M (1988) Clinical features of the failed back syndrome. J Neurosurg 69:61–71
Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:131–140
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1329–38
Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 340:418–423
Hofstee DJ, Gijtenbeek JM, Hoogland PH, van Houwelingen HC, Kloet A, Lotters F, Tans JT (2002) Westeinde sciatica trial: randomized controlled study of bed rest and physiotherapy for acute sciatica. J Neurosurg 96:45–49
Awad JN, Moskovich R (2006) Lumbar disc herniations: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:183–197
Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2008) Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 336:1355–1358
Henriksen L, Schmidt K, Eskesen V, Jantzen E (1996) A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 10:289–293
Lagarrigue J, Chaynes P (1994) Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases. Neurochirurgie 40:116–120
Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Nakamura H, Nakashima S, Ito Z, Ishiguro N (2006) Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:344–347
Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L (1993) Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:24–27
Van de Kelft E, De La Porte C (1994) Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome. Qual Life Res 3:21–27
Gibson JN, Waddell G (2007) Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001350
Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, van Kleef M, Lataster A, Mekhail N, Van Zundert J (2010) 11. Lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Pract 10:339–358
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van de Kelft, E. (2016). Herniated Lumbar Disk Evaluation and Surgical Management. In: van de Kelft, E. (eds) Surgery of the Spine and Spinal Cord. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27611-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27613-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)