Skip to main content

Open Anterior Component Separation with Perforator Preservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 4834 Accesses

Abstract

Repair of midline incisional hernias is a common procedure for which two related problems need to be solved. First, how can this high-tension internal closure best be achieved without the sutures cheesewiring through the fascia over time? Meshes are commonly used to distribute tension, but the optimal location of the mesh, its size, and the method of fixation are hotly debated. Equally argued is the optimal handling of the soft tissues required to place the mesh. This chapter will describe a means to reliably close a midline abdominal wall defect using a well-fixed narrow retrorectus mesh and a perforator-sparing anterior components release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Raines JK, Jaffrin MY, Rao S. A non-invasive pressure-pulse recorder: development and rationale. Med Instrum. 1973;7:245.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbons GW, Wheelock FC, Hoar CC, et al. Predicting success of forefoot amputations in diabetics by noninvasive testing. Arch Surg. 1979;114:1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang N, Mathes SJ. Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation on musculocutaneous and random pattern flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70:1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng LF, Price D, Hohn D, Mathes SJ. Blood flow changes and leukocyte mobilization in infection: a comparison between ischemia and well-perfused skin. Surg Forum. 1983;34:603.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abbott DE, Halverson AL, Wayne JD, Kim JY, Talamonti MS, Dumanian GA. The oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for complex pelvic wound reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1237–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dumanian GA. Discussion: minimally invasive component separation with inlay bioprosthetic mesh (MICSIB) for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:710–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe JB, Garza JR, Bowman JL, Rohrich RJ, Strodel WE. Endoscopically assisted “components separation” for closure of abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:720–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maas SM, van Engeland M, Leeksma NG, Bleichrodt RP. A modification of the “components separation” technique for closure of abdominal wall defects in the presence of an enterostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:138–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saulis A, Dumanian GA. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation significantly reduces superficial wound complications in “Separation of Parts” hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghali S, Turza K, Baumann DP, Butler CE. Minimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:981–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Armananzas L, Ruiz-Tovar J, Arroyo A, et al. Prophylactic mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:960–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander CH, Prudden JF. The causes of abdominal wound disruption. SGO. 1966;122:1223–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodeheaver GT, Nesbit WS, Edlich RF. Novafil, a dynamic suture for wound closure. Ann Surg. 1986;204:193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:1201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Playforth MJ, Sauven PD, Evans M, Pollock AV. The prediction of incisional hernias by radio-opaque markers. Ann Royal Col Surg Eng. 1986;68:82–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollock AV, Evans M. Early prediction of late incisional hernias. Br J Surg. 1989;76:953–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burger JW, Lange JF, Halm JA, Kleinrensink G-J, Jeekel H. Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg. 2005;29:1608–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xing L, Culbertson EJ, Wen Y, Franz MG. Early laparotomy wound failure as the mechanism for incisional hernia formation. J Surg Res. 2013;182:e35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD. Incisional hernias: when do they occur? Br J Surg. 1983;70:290–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoes J, Fischer L, Schachtrupp A. Laparotomy closure and incisional hernia prevention—what are the surgical requirements. Zentralbl Chir. 2011;136:42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Alizai PH, Lambertz A, von Trotha KT, Junker E, et al. Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model. BMC Surg. 2011;11:36–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheesborough JE, Dumanian GA. Simultaneous prosthetic mesh abdominal wall reconstruction with abdominoplasty for ventral hernia and severe rectus diastasis repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:268–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen KK, Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN. Endoscopic component separation for ventral hernia causes fewer wound complications compared to open components separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;228:3046–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Slater NJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Large and complex ventral hernia repair using “components separation technique” without mesh results in a high recurrence rate. Am J Surg. 2015;209:170–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Souza JM, Dumanian GA. Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intraabdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery. 2013;153:393–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Iqbal CW, Pham TH, Joseph A, Mai J, Thompson GB, Sarr MG. Long-term outcome of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives-Stoppa technique. World J Surg. 2007;31:2398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Dumanian M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Perforator Preserving Open ACS, by Dumanian (MP4 368,919 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dumanian, G.A. (2016). Open Anterior Component Separation with Perforator Preservation. In: Novitsky, Y. (eds) Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27470-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27470-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27468-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27470-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics