Abstract
As extensively studied in the artificial intelligence literature, agents may have to revise their beliefs when they receive a new piece of information, for avoiding inconsistency in their epistemic states, since one cannot believe p and believe \(\lnot p\) at the same time. Similarly desiring p and \(\lnot p\) simultaneously does not sound reasonable, since this would amount to be pleased by anything. This motivates an approach for revising desires, a topic remained largely untouched. Desires do not behave as beliefs. While beliefs are closed under conjunction, one may argue that the disjunction of desires reflects the endorsement of each desire. In a possibility theory modeling setting, desires are expressed by a strong possibility set function, while beliefs are encoded by means of a necessity function. The paper outlines an original approach to the revision, the expansion, and the contraction of desires in the framework of possibility theory, and contrasts it with belief revision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Practical handling of exception-tainted rules and independence information in possibilistic logic. Applied Intelligence 9(2), 101–127 (1998)
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar possibilistic representations. In: Darwiche, A., Friedman, N. (ed.) Proc. 18th Conf. in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2002), Edmonton, Alberta, August 1–4, pp. 45–52. Morgan Kaufmann (2002)
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A computational model for belief change and fusing ordered belief bases. In: Williams, M.-A., Rott, H. (eds.) Frontiers in Belief Revision, pp. 109–134. Publ., Kluwer Acad. (2001)
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.-A.: A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Studia Logica 70, 105–130 (2002)
Boutilier, C.: Revision sequences and nested conditionals. In: Proc. 13th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993), Chambéry, August 28 - September 3, pp. 519–525. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)
Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: A graded BDI agent model to represent and reason about preferences. Artificial Intelligence 175, 1468–1478 (2011)
Dubois, D., Le Berre, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: Logical representation and computation of optimal decisions in a qualitative setting. In: Proc. 15th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1998), July 26–30, Madison, Wisc, pp. 588–593. AAAI Press / The MIT Press (1998)
Dubois, D., Lorini, E., Prade, H.: Bipolar possibility theory as a basis for a logic of desires and beliefs. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8078, pp. 204–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Dubois, D., Lorini, E., Prade, H.: Nonmonotonic desires - A possibility theory viewpoint. In: Booth, R., Casini, G., Klarman, S., Richard, G., Varzinczak, I.J. (eds.) Proc. Int. Workshop on Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning (DARe@ECAI 2014), Prague, August 19, vol. 1212. CEUR Workshop Proc. (2014)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Epistemic entrenchment and possibilistic logic. Art. Int. 50, 223–239 (1991)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Belief change and possibility theory. In: Głrdenfors, P. (ed.) Belief Revision, pp. 142–182. University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A synthetic view of belief revision with uncertain inputs in the framework of possibility theory. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 17(2–3), 295–324 (1997)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory: qualitative and quantitative aspects. In: Gabbay, D., Smets, P. (eds.) Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 1, pp. 169–226. Kluwer (1998)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Bipolarity in flexible querying. In: Andreasen, T., Motro, A., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2522, pp. 174–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic: a retrospective and prospective view. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 144, 3–23 (2004)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems 23(8), 866–877 (2008)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160(10), 1355–1366 (2009)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic - An overview. In: Gabbay, D.M., Siekmann, J., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Computational Logic, vol. 9, pp. 283–342. Elsevier (2014)
Dubois, D., Prade, H., Touazi, F.: A possibilistic logic approach to conditional preference queries. In: Larsen, H.L., Martin-Bautista, M.J., Vila, M.A., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H. (eds.) FQAS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8132, pp. 376–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux. The MIT Press (1990)
Gärdenfors, P.: Belief revision and nonmonotonic logic: Two sides of the same coin? In: Proc. 9th Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1990), Stockholm, pp. 768–773 (1990)
Humberstone, I.L.: Direction of fit. Mind 101(401), 59–83 (1992)
Lang, J.: Conditional desires and utilities: An alternative logical approach to qualitative decision theory. In: Wahlster, W. (ed.) Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. Artif. Intellig. (ECAI 1996), Budapest, August 11–16, pp. 318–322. J. Wiley (1996)
Lang, J., van der Torre, L.W.N., Weydert, E.: Hidden uncertainty in the logical representation of desires. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) Proc. 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), Acapulco, August 9–15, pp. 685–690. Morgan Kaufmann (2003)
Platts, M.: Ways of meaning. Routledge and Kegan Paul (1979)
Searle, J.: Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dubois, D., Lorini, E., Prade, H. (2016). Revising Desires – A Possibility Theory Viewpoint. In: Andreasen, T., et al. Flexible Query Answering Systems 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26154-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26154-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26153-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26154-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)