Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outsourcing Under Price and Quality Competition: Single Firm Case

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competing on Supply Chain Quality

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 2))

  • 1554 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we add another set of decision-makers to a supply chain network – that of the contractors. We present a supply chain network equilibrium model with outsourcing under price and quality competition. We consider a firm that is engaged in determining the optimal product flows associated with its supply chain network activities in the form of manufacturing and distribution. In addition to multimarket demand satisfaction, the firm seeks to minimize its cost, with the associated function also capturing the firm’s weighted disrepute cost caused by possible quality issues associated with the contractors. Simultaneously, the contractors, who compete with one another in a noncooperative manner in prices a la Bertrand, and in quality, seek to secure manufacturing and distribution of the product from the firm. This game theory model allows for the determination of the optimal product flows associated with the supply chain in-house and outsourcing network activities and provides the firm with its optimal make-or-buy decisions and the optimal contractor-selections. We state the governing equilibrium conditions and derive the equivalent variational inequality formulation. We propose an algorithm and apply it to compute solutions to numerical examples to illustrate the generality and applicability of the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAFA (American Apparel and Footwear Association). (2012). AAFA releases ApparelStats 2012 report. http://www.wewear.org/aafa-releases-apparelstats-2012-report/

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. (2003). Legal cloud hangs over buyers. Australian Financial Review, 5(1), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, J., Billington, C., & Tsay, A. (2006). Safeguarding the promise of production outsourcing. Interfaces, 36(3), 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple. (2012). Apple reports fourth quarter results. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/10/25Apple-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-Results.html

  • Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (1996). A transaction costs approach to outsourcing: Some empirical evidence. Information and Management, 30, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., Hills, M., & Lim, E. (2003). Outsourcing of R&D: How worried should we be? National Academies Government University Industry Research Roundtable, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, J. (1883). Theorie mathematique de la richesse sociale. Journal des Savants, 67, 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth, C. C., Warsing, D. P., Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecere, L. (2005). So you want to outsource manufacturing. Supply Chain Management Review, 9(6), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2004). Operations management for competitive advantage (10th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, I. M. (2004). The changing structure of the pharmaceutical industry. Health Affairs, 23(1), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A. A. (1838). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth (English Trans.). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, S. C., & Sparrow, F. T. (1969). The traffic assignment problem for a general network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 73B, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., Zhang, D., Yan, H., & Nagurney, A. (2005). Multitiered supply chain networks: Multicriteria decision-making under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 135, 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensinger, D. (2010, July 11). US pharmaceutical outsourcing threat. Economy in Crisis. http://economyincrisis.org/content/outsourcing-americas-medicine

  • European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. (2010). The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union Vol. 4, Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA. (2002). FDA’s general CGMP regulations for human drugs. In Codes of Federal Regulations, parts 210 and 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Pignatelli, A., & Varetto, M. (2003). Outsourcing: Guidelines for a structured approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10, 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabay, D., & Moulin, H. (1980). On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In A. Bensoussan, P. Kleindorfer, & C. S. Tapiero (Eds.), Applied stochastic control in econometrics and management science (pp. 271–294). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, D., & Litvinov, E. (2003). Energy and reserve market designs with explicit consideration to lost opportunity costs. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(1), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1990). A new look at the returns and risks to pharmaceutical R&D. Management Science, 36(7), 804–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. (2009, January 29). Peanut plant broadens product list under recall. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/29peanut.html?fta=y

  • Harris, G. (2011, August 3). Deal in place for inspecting foreign drugs. The New York Times. http://www.lackritz.net/OverseasDrugs.pdf

  • Hayes, R., Pisano, G., Upton, D., & Wheelwright, S. (2005). Operations, strategy, and technology: Pursuing the competitive edge. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, K. A. (2006). Outsourcing the fire of genius: The effects of patent infringement jurisprudence on pharmaceutical drug development. Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 17, 153–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (2003). Productivity growth, efficiency and outsourcing in manufacturing and service industries. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(1), 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insinga, R. C., & Werle, M. J. (2000). Linking outsourcing to business strategy. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B., Belohlav, J. A., & Young, S. T. (2007). Outsourcing impact on manufacturing firms’ value: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 885–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, S. (2006). Leadership and strategic change in outsourcing core competencies: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Human Systems Management, 25(2), 35–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, O. (2011). Outsourcing vs. in-house production: A comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand. Omega, 39, 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopack, T. G. (2000). Strategic outsourcing: Balancing the risks and the benefits. Drug Discovery Today, 54, 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1328–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Nagurney, A. (2013). Supply chain networks with global outsourcing and quick-response production under demand and cost uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 208(1), 251–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G. (2011). Principles of microeconomics (6th ed.). Mason: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoumi, A. H., Yu, M., & Nagurney, A. (2012). A supply chain generalized network oligopoly model for pharmaceuticals under brand differentiation and perishability. Transportation Research E, 48, 762–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (1999). Network economics: A variational inequality approach (2nd and Rev. ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2006). Supply chain network economics: Dynamics of prices, flows, and profits. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., Li, D., & Nagurney, L. S. (2013). Pharmaceutical supply chain networks with outsourcing under price and quality competition. International Transactions in Operational Research, 20(6), 859–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., & Yu, M. (2011). Fashion supply chain management through cost and time minimization from a network perspective. In T. M. Choi (Ed.), Fashion supply chain management: Industry and business analysis (pp. 1–20). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., Yu, M., & Qiang, Q. (2011). Supply chain network design for critical needs with outsourcing. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1996). Projected dynamical systems and variational inequalities with applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1997). Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transportation Science, 31(2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (1999). An empirical investigation of the contribution of strategic sourcing to manufacturing flexibilities and performance. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 683–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 36, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1951). Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Oxford American Dictionary. (2010). In A. Stevenson & C. A. Lindberg (Eds.) (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D., & Wu, D. (2011). Risk management models for supply chain: A scenario analysis of outsourcing to China. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S., & Raftery, J. (1999). Economics notes: Opportunity cost. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 318(7197), 1551–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. (2008). Is pharma’s supply chain safe? Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, 20(7), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (1996). When time is money: Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. T. (1996). Die grenzenlose unternehmung: Information, organisation und management (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34(1), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purtell, D. (2010). A risk-based remedy for pharma supply chain security concerns. Reston: BSI Group America Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiang, Q., & Nagurney, A. (2012). A bi-criteria indicator to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions. Transportation Research A, 46(5), 801–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, C. (2012, January 22). Why Apple’s products are “Designed in California” but “Assembled in China”. Tuaw. http://www.tuaw.com/2012/01/22/why-apples-products-are-designed-in-california-but-assembled/

  • Sandoval-Chavez, D. A., & Beruvides, M. G. (1998). Using opportunity costs to determine the cost of quality: A case study in a continuous-process industry. The Engineering Economist, 43, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, A. M. (1986, November 28–31). Optimum quality costs and zero defects. Quality Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, A. B., Dong, Y., & Corsi, T. (2014). Global sourcing and quality recalls: An empirical study of outsourcing-supplier concentration-product recalls linkages. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA (Food and Drug Administration), CDER (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), CBER (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research). (2009). Guidance for Industry: Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. (2007). Opportunities in biopharmaceutical outsourcing to China. BioProcess International, 5(1), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

    Anna Nagurney

  2. Department of Management and Marketing College of Business, Arkansas State University, State University, Arkansas, USA

    Dong Li

Authors
  1. Anna Nagurney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nagurney, A., Li, D. (2016). Outsourcing Under Price and Quality Competition: Single Firm Case. In: Competing on Supply Chain Quality. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25451-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation