Skip to main content

Sampling Rates and Sensor Requirements for Kinematic Assessment During Running Using Foot Mounted IMUs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sports Science Research and Technology Support (icSPORTS 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 556))

  • 593 Accesses

Abstract

Inertial sensors have the potential to enable in-situ monitoring of athletic performance. They may offer applications in injury prevention and rehabilitation as well as in technique assessment for improved performance. This paper investigates the use of foot worn inertial sensors in order to assess running kinematics. Footwear provides a potential platform for continuous and in-situ monitoring that does not require additional components to be worn by the athlete since inertial sensors are now small enough to be integrated into footwear. These sensors are also inexpensive enough to be accessible to consumers, opening up the possibility of biomechanical assessment not only to elite athletes but also recreational runners. To facilitate widespread adoption by athletes of all types, sensor systems must be as cheap as possible. To achieve this, sensor systems must be engineered with sampling rates that are not unnecessarily high and components that are not over specified. At the same time accuracy requirements must be met. We investigate multiple sensor parameters (sampling rate, acceleration range) and the effects these have on the accuracy of kinematic assessment using foot worn inertial sensors. We find that Extended Kalman Filter based trajectory recovery seems to be little affected by sampling rate until lower than 250 Hz. We investigate impact accelerations using an inertial measurement unit attached to the foot and find that, at 250 Hz, the acceleration signal peaks at up to 70g around heel strike. We also show that the addition of a high range accelerometer improves accuracy of two example metrics that may be useful in gait assessment, maximum foot clearance (FC) and mean step velocity (SV). The 95 % limits of agreement for FC using a (\(\pm \) 16g) accelerometer were -4.4 cm to 5.4 cm, this was improved using a high range (\(\pm \) 200g) accelerometer. The limits of agreement for FC using the improved system where -2.6 cm to 2.6 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bailey, G.P., Harle, R.: Assessment of foot kinematics during steady state running using a foot-mounted IMU. Procedia Eng. 72, 32–37 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bichler, S., Ogris, G., Kremser, V., Schwab, F., Knott, S., Baca, A.: Towards high-precision IMU/GPS-based stride-parameter determination in an outdoor runners’ scenario. Procedia Eng. 34, 592–597 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Foxlin, E.: Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25(6), 38–46 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harle, R., Taherian, S., Pias, M., Coulouris, G., Hopper, A., Cameron, J., Lasenby, J., Kuntze, G., Bezodis, I., Irwin, G., Kerwin, D.G.: Towards real-time profiling of sprints using wearable pressure sensors. Comput. Commun. 35(6), 650–660 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariani, B., Hoskovec, C., Rochat, S., Büla, C., Penders, J., Aminian, K.: 3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors. J. Biomech. 43, 2999–3006 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mizrahi, J.: Effect of fatigue on leg kinematics and impact acceleration in long distance running. Hum. Mov. Sci. 19(2), 139–151 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Munoz Diaz, E., Heirich, O., Khider, M., Robertson, P.: Optimal sampling frequency and bias error modeling for foot-mounted IMUs. In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, pp. 1–9. IEEE, October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peruzzi, A., Della Croce, U., Cereatti, A.: Estimation of stride length in level walking using an inertial measurement unit attached to the foot: a validation of the zero velocity assumption during stance. J. Biomech. 44, 1991–1994 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. P. Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bailey, G.P., Harle, R.K. (2015). Sampling Rates and Sensor Requirements for Kinematic Assessment During Running Using Foot Mounted IMUs. In: Cabri, J., Barreiros, J., Pezarat Correia, P. (eds) Sports Science Research and Technology Support. icSPORTS 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 556. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25249-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25249-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25248-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25249-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics