Abstract
We start with an account of the history of physics in the early 20th century as it applies to the development of quantum mechanics and its interpretation. This account is intended to show how the theory and interpretation were developed and came to be in the state in which we find them today. Writing about the development of science can be frustrating to the writer, because there are so many people involved, so many false starts, so many mistaken ideas, so much bad data, and a tangled story-line of rejected ideas and falsified theories left behind. I will attempt to streamline the lines of development by focusing on the ideas that turned out to be better and more important. I will, for the most part, ignore the bad ideas, the misconceptions, and the minor contributions. This perhaps distorts history, but I am not a historian, and I feel no obligation to achieve historical precision. Rather, I want to communicate the feel of the intellectually turbulent times when quantum mechanics was emerging. Many individual contributions will be ignored or neglected, but a picture of the development of quantum mechanics, with all its triumphs, paradoxes, and problems, should emerge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
More precisely, if \(\sigma _{x}\) is the standard deviation of the position x probability distribution function (PDF) and \(\sigma _{p}\) is the standard deviation of the momentum \(p_{x}\) PDF, then \(\sigma _{x} \sigma _{p} \ge \hbar /2\). Similarly, if \(\sigma _{E}\) is the standard deviation of the energy PDF and \(\sigma _{t}\) is the standard deviation of the time PDF, then \(\sigma _{E} \sigma _{t} \ge \hbar /2\).
References
M. Born, W. Heisenberg, Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Z. für Phys. 33, 879–893 (1925). First paper on the matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics
M. Born, P. Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik, Z. für Phys. 34, 858–888 (1925). Second paper on the matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics
M. Born, W. Heisenberg, P. Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik II. Z. für Phys. 35(8–9), 557–615 (1926). Third paper on the matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics
E. Schrödinger, Ann. der Phys. 79, 361 (1926)
E. Schrödinger, Ann. der Phys. 79, 486 (1926)
E. Schrödinger, Ann. der Phys. 79, 734 (1926)
E. Schrödinger, Ann. der Phys. 81, 109 (1926)
W. Heisenberg, Reminiscences from 1926 and 1927, in reference [39]
W. Heisenberg, Z. für Phys. 43, 172 (1927). Translated in [40], pp. 62–84
W. Heisenberg, Z. für Phys. 33, 879 (1925)
W. Heisenberg, The development of the interpretation of quantum theory, in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, ed. by W. Pauli (Pergamon, London, 1955)
N. Bohr, Atti del Congresso Internazionale dei Fisici Como, 11–20 Settembre 1927, vol. 2 (Zanchelli, Bologna, 1928), pp. 565–588
M. Born, Z. für Phys. 37, 863 (1926), pp. 52–55. Translated in [40]
W. Heisenberg, Daedalus 87, 95 (1958)
M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974)
S.S. Afshar, Violation of the principle of complementarity, and its implications, Proc. SPIE, 5866, 229–244 (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0701027
S.J. Freedman, J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972)
R. Peierls, In defense of measurement. Phys. World 19–20 (1979)
L. Rosenfeld, in [40] (1955), pp. 477–478
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–785 (1935)
A. Einstein in a 1947 letter to M. Born (see [22])
M. Born, A. Einstein, in The Born-Einstein Letters, ed. by M. Walker (Born, New York, 1979)
N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935)
Th Görnitz, C.F. von Weizsäcker, Copenhagen and transactional interpretations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 27, 237–250 (1988)
E. Schrödinger, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)
E. Schrödinger, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32, 446–451 (1936)
J.A. Wheeler, Polyelectrons. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 48, 157 (1945)
C.S. Wu, I. Shaknov, The angular correlation of scattered annihilation radiation (letter to the editor). Phys. Rev. 77, 136 (1950)
J.S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)
J.S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966)
D. Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, (Routledge & Kegan Paul and D. van Nostrand, 1957). ISBN: 0-8122-1002-6
C.A. Kocher, E.D. Commins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 575 (1967)
N. Herbert, Am. J. Phys. 43, 315 (1975)
J.F. Clauser, M. Horne, A. Shimony, R. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982)
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)
W. Tittel, J. Brendel, B. Gisin, T. Herzog, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, Experimental demonstration of quantum-correlations over more than 10 kilometers, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3229 (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9707042
W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563–6 (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9806043
A.P. French, P.J. Kennedy (eds.), Niels Bohr, A Centernary Volume (Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge, 1985)
J.A. Wheeler, W.H. Zurek (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton UniversityPress, Princeton, 1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cramer, J.G. (2016). The Curious History of Quantum Mechanics. In: The Quantum Handshake. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24642-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24642-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24640-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24642-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)