Skip to main content

History of Total Ankle Replacement in North America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement

Abstract

Attempts at total ankle replacement (TAR) have existed for at least 55 years. Time has essentially eliminated constrained, cemented, first-generation prostheses. Although some two-component, more anatomical designs are still used and with varying success, it seems that three-component mobile-bearing ankle prostheses are the predominant design utilized in Europe and in North America despite two-component designs being more prevalent. Not only did the prostheses change over the years but also the patients and surgeons. Surgeons specialize in foot and ankle surgery, improving their surgical outcomes and expanding the indications for TAR, in technically demanding, “complex” ankles. The future will set the limits, as enthusiasm over bright ideas was often followed by skepticism. We provide a thorough review on the history of TARs that have been and are currently in use in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gougoulias N, Maffulli N. History of total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gougoulias NE, Khanna A, Maffulli N. History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull. 2009;89(1):111–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Easley ME, Adams Jr SB, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1455–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou LB, Coughlin MT, Hansen Jr S, Haskell A, Lundeen G, Saltzman CL, Mann RA. Osteoarthritis of the ankle: the role of arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(5):249–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guyer AJ, Richardson G. Current concepts review: total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cracchiolo III A, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(9):530–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Learmonth I, Young C, Rorebeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Argeiter M, Stockl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):293–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hahn ME, Wright ES, Segal AD, Orendurff MS, Ledoux WR, Sangeorzan BJ. Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(4):282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeHeer PA, Catoire SM, Taulman J, Borer B. Ankle arthrodesis: a literature review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012;29(4):509–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coester LM, Saltzmann CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83(2):219–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaidi R, Cro S, Gurusamy K, Siva N, Macgregor A, Henricson A, Goldberg A. The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(11):1500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lord G, Marotte JH. Total ankle prosthesis. Technic and 1st results. Apropos of 12 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1973;59(2):139–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eloesser L. Implantation of joints. Cal State J Med. 1913;11(12):485–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Muir DC, Amendola A, Saltzman CL. Forty-year outcome of ankle “cup” arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis. Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:99–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lord G, Marotte JH. Total ankle replacement. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1980;66(8):527–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht E, Siegel A. Totale Sprunggelenksendoprothese Model St. Georg. Chirurg. 1973;44:241–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Engelbrecht E. Ankle endoprosthesis model “St. George”. Z Orthop Grenz. 1975;113(4):546–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman MA, Kempson MA, Tuke MA. Total replacement of the ankle with the ICLH prosthesis. Int Orthop. 1979;2(4):237–331.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bolton-Maggs BG, Sudlow RA, Freeman MA. Total ankle arthroplasty. A long-term review of the London Hospital experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(5):785–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wynn AH, Wilde AH. Long-term follow up of the Conaxial (Beck-Steffee) total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(6):303–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlsson ÅS, Henricson A, Linde L, Redlund‐Johnell I. A 10-year survival analysis of 69 Bath and Wessex ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;71(1):39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen NC, Kroner K. Total ankle joint replacement: a clinical follow-up. Orthopedics. 1992;15(2):236–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schill S, Biehl C, Thabe H. Ankle prostheses. Mid-term results after Thompson-Richards and STAR prostheses. Orthopade. 1998;27(3):183–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wood PLR, Clough TM, Jari S. Comparison of two total ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(7):546–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirkup J. Richard Smith ankle arthroplasty. J R Soc Med. 1985;78(4):301–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y. The TNK ankle. Short- and mid-term results. Orthopade. 2006;35(5):546–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nishikawa M, Tomita T, Fujii M, Watanabe T, Hashimoto J, Sugamoto K, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H. Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Int Orthop. 2004;28(2):123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Waugh TR, Evanski PM, McMaster WC. Irvine ankle arthroplasty: prosthetic design and surgical technique. Clin Orthop. 1976;114:180–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Newton III SE. Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(1):104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stauffer RN, Segal NM. Total ankle arthroplasty: four years’ experience. Clin Orthop. 1981;160:217–21.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(11):1658–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pappas MJ, Buechel FF, DePalma AF. Cylindrical total ankle joint replacement: surgical and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop. 1976;118:82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hvid I, Rasmussen O, Jensen NC, Nielsen S. Trabecular bone strength profiles at the ankle joint. Clin Orthop. 1985;199:306–12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/P050050A.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2014.

  38. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, Saltzman CL. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Feldman MH, Rockwood J. Total ankle arthroplasty: a review of 11 current ankle implants. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21(3):393–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hurowitz EJ, Gould JS, Fleising GS, et al. Outcome analysis of agility total ankle replacement with prior adjunctive procedures: two to six year follow up. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:308–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sprit AA, Assal M, Hansen Jr ST. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:1172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O’Malley MJ. Total ankle arthroplasty with the Agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roukis TS. Incidence of revision after primary implantation of the Agility total ankle replacement system: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(2):198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cerrato R, Myerson MS. Total ankle replacement: the Agility LP prosthesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;3(3):485–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle. 1988;8(6):279–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/default.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  48. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(6):1272–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. San Giovanni TP, Keblish DJ, Thomas WH, Wilson MG. Eight-year results of a minimally constrained total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(6):418–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kofoed H, Sorensen TS. Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):328–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rippstein PF, Huber M, Coetzee JC, Naal FD. Total ankle replacement with use of a new three-component implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1426–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood PL, Karski MT, Watmough P. Total ankle replacement: the results of 100 mobility total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(7):958–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Muir D, Aoina J, Hong T, Mason R. The outcome of the Mobility total ankle replacement at a mean of four years: can poor outcomes be predicted from pre- and post-operative analysis? Bone Joint J. 2013;95(1):1366–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Roukis TS, Prissel MA. Registry data trends of total ankle replacement use. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):728–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(10):964–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Goldberg AJ, Sharp RJ, Cooke P. Ankle replacement: current practice of foot and ankle surgeons in the United Kingdom. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(1):950–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kokkonen A, Ikävalko M, Tiihonen R, Kautiainen H, Belt EA. High rate of osteolytic lesions in medium-term follow-up after the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(2):168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. http://www.tornier-us.com/lower/ankle/ankrec004/. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  60. Bonnin M, Gaudot F, Laurent JR, Ellis S, Colombier JA, Judet T. The Salto total ankle arthroplasty: survivorship and analysis of failures at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:225–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schenk K, Lieske S, John M, Franke K, Mouly S, Lizee E, Neumann W. Prospective study of a cementless, mobile-bearing, third generation total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(8):755–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schweitzer KM, Adams SB, Viens NA, Queen RM, Easley ME, Deorio JK, Nunley JA. Early prospective clinical results of a modern fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1002–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gaudot F, Colombier JA, Bonnin M, Judet T. A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):131–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kofoed H. Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:73–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. http://www.totalsmallbone.com/us/products/foot_ankle/star.php4. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  66. Wood PLR, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement. Medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(5):605–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Karantana A, Hobson S, Dhar S. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):951–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao H, Yang Y, Yu G, Zhou J. A systematic review of outcome and failure rate of uncemented Scandinavian total ankle replacement. Int Orthop. 2011;35(12):1751–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson Å. Uncemented STAR total ankle prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85(7):321–9.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Carlsson Å. Single- and double-coated star total ankle replacements: a clinical and radiographic follow-up study of 109 cases. Orthopade. 2006;35(5):527–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Henricson A, Nilsson JÅ, Carlsson A. 10-year survival of total ankle arthroplasties: a report on 780 cases from the Swedish Ankle Register. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(6):655–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Fevang BTS, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):575–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Valderabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, Brodsky JW, Chou LB, Clanton TO, Deland JT, Deorio JK, Horton GA, Lee TH, Mann JA, Nunley JA, Thordarson DB, Walling AK, Wapner KL, Coughlin MJ. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E. STAR ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(5):473–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Barg A, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Zwicky L, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement using Hintegra, an unconstrained, three-component system: surgical technique and pitfalls. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):607–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Barg A, Zwicky L, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Hintermann B. Hintegra total ankle replacement: survivorship analysis in 684 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(13):1175–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hintermann B, Zwicky L, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Barg A. Hintegra revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(13):1166–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Agreiter M. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(8):740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, Glazebrook M. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lee KT, Jegal H, Park YU, Kim JB, Lee YK, Yeo ED, Yang SS, Yoon SA. Comparison of sagittal subluxation in two different three-component total ankle replacement systems. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(12):1661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Choi GW, Kim HJ, Yeo ED, Song SY. Comparison of the Hintegra and Mobility total ankle replacements. Short- to intermediate-term outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(8):1075–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Scott RT, Witt BL, Hyer CF. Design comparison of the INBONE I versus INBONE II total ankle system. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(2):137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Abicht BP, Roukis TS. The INBONE II total ankle system. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):47–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. DeOrio JK. Revision INBONE total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(2):225–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Clement RC, Krynetskiy E, Parekh SG. The total ankle arthroplasty learning curve with third-generation implants: a single surgeon’s experience. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(4):263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Datir A, Xing M, Kakarala A, Terk MR, Labib SA. Radiographic evaluation of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(12):1693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ellis S, Deorio JK. The INBONE total ankle replacement. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20(3):201–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Adams SB, Demetracopoulos CA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1983–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Valderrabano V, Pagenstert GI, Müller AM, Paul J, Henninger HB, Barg A. Mobile- and fixed-bearing total ankle prostheses: is there really a difference? Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):565–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Gougoulias MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gougoulias, N., Maffulli, N. (2016). History of Total Ankle Replacement in North America. In: Roukis, T., et al. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24415-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24415-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24413-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24415-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics