Abstract
This book presents one of the first international discussions of aging through the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Age-Friendly City and Community” (AFCC) model. Even if the WHO’s program is not the only one to support an “aging-friendly” perspective (Lui et al. in Aus J Ageing 28: 116–121, 2009; Scharlach and Lehning in Ageing Soc 33: 110–136, 2013) and even if it is not the first one that has linked aging and environmental perspective and insisted on the need for policy support (Phillipson in Handbook of sociology of aging. Springer, New York, pp 279–293, 2011) refers to UN-Habitat report and to the NORCS—“naturally occurring retirement communities”), it is however the first one that permits researchers to explore the various international translations of the Age-Friendly Environments thinking, AFCC becoming a case study for such objective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note from the editors: if we opt for English American according to the rules of the publisher, the international perspective of this book implies a compromise concerning the term aging/aging (and its association in “active aging/aging”) because traditions may differ and also because “active aging” has been particularly discussed in Europe (Walker 2002) as an attempt to go beyond US concept of “productive aging” (Bass et al. 1993).
- 2.
Concerning “active aging” we should also mention the recent Active Aging Index developed by a team led by professor Ashgar Zaïdi as a statistical tool to assess the level of European countries (data’s from and comparison with countries outside Europe are also into progress) in four domains related to the concept (employment; participation in society; independent, healthy and secure living; capacity and enabling environment for active aging). For further details: (Online). Available from http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/display/AAI/Active+Ageing+Index+Home. Accessed May 13, 2015.
- 3.
It might also be associated with the position of the authors of the chapters. In particular, the French chapter has been written by French sociologists who might be particularly critical about public policies and be more reserved about the role of research facing such policies.
References
Barusch, A. S. (2013). Age-friendly cities: A social work perspective. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56(6), 465–472.
Bass, S. A., Caro, F. G., & Chen, Y.-P. (Eds.). (1993). Achieving a productive aging society. Westport, Conn.: Auburn House.
Biggs, S., & Haapala, I. (2015). Age friendly environments. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 1–3.
Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., Money, A., & Leach, R. (2006). The age-shift: Observations on social policy, ageism and the dynamics of the adult lifecourse. Journal of Social Work Practice, 20(3), 239–250.
Bindels, J., Baur, V., Cox, K., Heijing, S., & Abma, T. (2014). Older people as co-researchers: A collaborative journey. Ageing and Society, 34(06), 951–973.
Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., De Donder, L., Dury, S., De Witte, N., et al. (2013). Developing age-friendly cities: case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26(1–2), 52–72.
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing “age-friendly” cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617.
Dagenais, C., Ridde, V., Laurendeau, M.-C., & Souffez, K. (2009). Knowledge translation research in population health: Establishing a collaborative research agenda. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(28) (Online). Available from http://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-28. Accessed May 30, 2015.
Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 1–18.
Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2016). International perspectives on age-friendly cities. N.A.: Routledge (Online). Available from https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415720717. Accessed June 5, 2015.
Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A., & Laliberté, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26(1–2), 73–87.
Hills, M., & Mullett, J. (2000). Community-based research: creating evidence-based practice for health and social change. (Online). Available from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001388.htm. Accessed May 30, 2015.
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hudson, R. B. (2015). Making a Home in the City: The age-friendly community movement. Public Policy & Aging Report, 25(1), 1–3 (Online). Available from http://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/pru057. Accessed June 5, 2015.
Keating, N., Eales, J., & Phillips, J. E. (2013). Age-friendly rural communities: Conceptualizing “best-fit”. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 32(4), 319–332.
Lassen, A. J. (2014). Keeping disease at arm’s length—how older Danish people distance disease through active ageing. Ageing and Society, 1–20 (Online). Available from http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000245. Accessed May 30, 2015.
Lassen, A. J., & Moreira, T. (2014). Unmaking old age: Political and cognitive formats of active ageing. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 33–46 (Online). Available from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.004. Accessed May 30, 2015.
Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
Lui, C., Everingham, J., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–121.
Marhankova, J. H. (2011). Leisure in old age: Disciplinary practices surrounding the discourse of active ageing. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 6(1), 5–32.
Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G., & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 479–493.
Moulaert, T. (2012a). Gouverner les fins de carrière à distance. Outplacement et vieillissement actif en emploi. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
Moulaert, T. (2012b). Pourquoi les francophones préfèrent-ils la sociologie du vieillissement à la gérontologie critique ? Gérontologie et Société, 142(3), 81–99.
Moulaert, T., & Biggs, S. (2013). International and European policy on work and retirement: Reinventing critical perspectives on active ageing and mature subjectivity. Human Relations, 66(1), 23–43.
Moulaert, T., & Garon, S. (2015). Researchers behind policy development: Comparing “age-friendly cities” models in Quebec and Wallonia. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 1–13.
Moulaert, T., & Paris, M. (2013). Social policy on ageing: The case of “active ageing” as a theatrical metaphor. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 113–123.
Moulaert, T., & Viriot Durandal, J.-P. (2013) (Eds.). Production et rapport aux normes contemporaines du vieillissement. L’injonction au «bien vieillir» en question. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 44(1).
Paris, M., Garon, S., & Beaulieu, M. (2013). La lutte pour la reconnaissance de la vieillesse: Un regard critique sur l’estime sociale des aînés. McGill Sociological Review, 3, 5–17.
Phillipson, C. (2010). Ageing and urban society: growing old in the “century of the city”. In C. Phillipson & D. Dannefer (Eds.), The sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 597–606). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Phillipson, C. (2011). Developing age-friendly communities: New approaches to growing old in urban environments. In S. Settersten & J. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 279–293). New York: Springer.
Scharlach, A. (2009). Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 5–11.
Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing and Society, 33(1), 110–136.
UN. (2002). Madrid international plan of action on ageing. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Evaluation Group. (2015). Evaluation changes lives: Realizing evaluation potential to inform the global sustainable development goals. New York: United Nations.
Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–139.
Walker, A. (2007). Why involve older people in research? Age and Ageing, 36(5), 481–483.
WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: WHO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moulaert, T., Garon, S. (2016). Introduction: Toward a Better Understanding of AFCC. In: Moulaert, T., Garon, S. (eds) Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison. International Perspectives on Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24029-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24031-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)